The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
[ Presenting plain-text part of multi-format email ] In a message dated 08/05/03 14:13:56 GMT Daylight Time, Tcapj writes: > In a message dated 07/05/03 10:04:13 GMT Daylight Time, hasseini@yahoo.com > writes: > > > >> Re: [casi] lest we forget ... >> Date:07/05/03 10:04:13 GMT Daylight Time >> From:<A HREF="mailto:hasseini@yahoo.com">hasseini@yahoo.com</A> >> To:<A HREF="mailto:casi-discuss@lists.casi.org.uk">casi-discuss@lists.casi.org.uk</A> >> Sent from the Internet >> >> >> >> > > We mustn't expect too much. When Annan accepted the job once US decided > that Boutros Boutros Ghali had to go because he told the truth about > Israel, it was obvious he would never stand up to US. Nevertheless, perhaps > for the first time, the SC did not comply with US demands, shamefully > supported by UK and Spain. That is to be encouraged. Even if General > Assembly failed to act, presumably because of US/UK pressure. It is better > to see SC break up than to submit to US/UK illegal demands. France, Russia, > and Germany have to be encouraged. I think there will be increasing > disillusionment in UK with Blair's licking Bush. > > Chris > From: Tcapj@aol.com Full-name: Tcapj Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 09:13:56 EDT Subject: Re: [casi] lest we forget ... To: hasseini@yahoo.com X-Plaintext: Presenting plain-text part of multi-format email [ Presenting plain-text part of multi-format email ] In a message dated 07/05/03 10:04:13 GMT Daylight Time, hasseini@yahoo.com writes: > Re: [casi] lest we forget ... > Date:07/05/03 10:04:13 GMT Daylight Time > From:<A HREF="mailto:hasseini@yahoo.com">hasseini@yahoo.com</A> > To:<A HREF="mailto:casi-discuss@lists.casi.org.uk">casi-discuss@lists.casi.org.uk</A> > Sent from the Internet > > > > We mustn't expect too much. When Annan accepted the job once US decided that Boutros Boutros Ghali had to go because he told the truth about Israel, it was obvious he would never stand up to US. Nevertheless, perhaps for the first time, the SC did not comply with US demands, shamefully supported by UK and Spain. That is to be encouraged. Even if General Assembly failed to act, presumably because of US/UK pressure. It is better to see SC break up than to submit to US/UK illegal demands. France, Russia, and Germany have to be encouraged. I think there will be increasing disillusionment in UK with Blair's licking Bush. Chris _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk