The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
Judge Gilbert S. Merritt feels that a gag order issued by Bremer "contradicts U.S. values Iraqis like". > It is, to say the least, ironic that, as a federal > judge, I was asked to come here to try to help erect > and establish constitutional values for the Iraqis, > including the rights of free speech and other civil > liberties. It's interesting that Judge Merritt seems so put out by that "gag". Surely he should be used by now to the curtailment of free speech and civil liberties in his own country. > Americans are entitled to speak their minds, especially > on matters involving government, politics, law, foreign > policy and other public concerns. We value robust debate > because our founding fathers believed that open debate > was good in itself and would lead to better public > policy, more scientific and technological progress and > better artistic expression. Yes... free speech is an entitlement. But Americans have come to realize that the "robust debate" better be positive: no dissent please, it's unpatriotic. > That is what the Iraqis admire about us and wish to > have for themselves. They are thankful that we have > liberated them from the tyrant so that they may now > have prosperity through freedom of contract and free > speech. Admiration...? Perhaps Judge Merritt didn't take the pulse of the Iraqis' psyche. And perhaps he didn't watch infants dying for lack of clean water. Or didn't notice that people have no income, no food, no electricity - and little hope. Perhaps he doesn't realize that Iraqis are treated as third-class citizens in their own country. Perhaps he doesn't know that Iraqis using their new 'freedom' to demonstrate against this treatment are being shot at - wounded and killed. Would you feel admiration? Here is how a young Iraqi woman put it: the people feel "absolutely agitated or furious". And "one day", she thinks, "there will be a great revolution against the Americans". All Iraqis want, says this young woman, is the chance to life their lives. Now, she says, "they even start wishing if they were born in very poor country which doesn't draw anybody's attention." And yes, she says, Iraqis desperately want back a government structure, law and order - security: "All you have to do is forming a decent real government! Is that hard to be done? or is it been postponed for some hidden reasons which we can't realize now but maybe later on we can, only God knows." She is right about the "hidden reasons" for the delay in forming a government: Bremer had in fact scheduled an early election. And when it appeared that an Islamic party would win he cancelled it. Besides, his chosen pet puppet hadn't been able to drum up any support. Certainly Iraqis you can have any government you want, figured Bremer, as long as we are the ones picking it for you. And we won't pick an Islamic party - no way. After all we liberated you so we can get a firm grip on Iraq. No outside meddlers. This is American democracy - with a bucket full of realpolitik thrown in. So someone had better tell Judge Merritt, the media, and the Bush administration that whatever the Iraqis are feeling right now, it isn't likely to be admiration. And any admiration the world elsewhere feels has been paid for. In fact, there hasn't been that much admiration inside America either - closing of ranks, yes. But many Americans are worried about their civil liberties. They feel that their Bill of Rights has been strangled by the Patriotic Act, the Homeland Security Bill, and other policies. I am going to post three articles separately about the erosion of civil liberties and free speech in America. Regards, Elga Sutter -------------Original Message------------- From: "ppg" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: "casi" <email@example.com> Subject: [casi] "...my last story from Baghdad" Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 00:43:16 -0400 >From The Tennessean [major US newspaper] "Federal appellate judge Gilbert S. Merritt of Nashville is in Iraq as one of 13 experts selected by the U.S. Justice Department to help rebuild Iraq's judicial system. Merritt, 67, has made trips to Russia and India to work with their judicial systems. He has been sending periodic reports to The Tennessean about his experiences in Iraq and filed this dispatch recently: 'Gag' order contradicts U.S. values Iraqis like "This is my last story from Baghdad. The so-called "Coalition Provisional Authority", or CPA, acting through its head, L. Paul Bremer, issued a ''gag'' order two days ago that says: ''Speaking To The Media. To insure the effective co-ordination of the CPA's message, any plan for a member of the CPA to talk to the media should first be coordinated with the Directorate of Strategic Communication.'' The Directorate of Strategic Communication, according to the order, was a ''recent creation designed with the intention of delivering a coherent strategic information for the CPA.'' The CPA is organized into many separate agencies covering governance, justice, transportation and communication, health, oil, police, culture, finance and several others. All persons working or helping these agencies carry out their tasks are apparently covered by the order prohibiting speaking to the press unless the speech is cleared first by the Directorate of Strategic Communication. I have been informed that this includes any article I may write, or verbal utterance I may speak, to any members of the press, including my hometown newspaper. In my opinion, this is a clear violation of the First Amendment to our Constitution, which says that our government may not impose any law, regulation or directive ''abridging the freedom of speech.'' The First Amendment covers any attempt by our government to control the speech of a civilian citizen of the United States, with only a few exceptions. There are many cases in the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals more than 2,000 that hold that the Free Speech Clause covers state and federal officials and employees. Those cases secure to such employees the right to speak on matters of public concern broadly defined and to converse with the press and others without abridgment or control. It is true that the government may restrict the release of classified information by its employees, and it may regulate speech that could create in the words of an old Supreme Court case a ''clear and present'' danger for its citizens. But this limitation on speech is far broader than that. It includes all speech ''any plan for any member of CPA to talk to the media.'' Although the order is clearly unconstitutional, in my view, I intend to comply with its terms from now until I leave Iraq and am no longer subject to it. I will be leaving in a few days to meet my wife, Robin, in Istanbul for a few days' vacation before returning home to Nashville. It is, to say the least, ironic that, as a federal judge, I was asked to come here to try to help erect and establish constitutional values for the Iraqis, including the rights of free speech and other civil liberties. Americans are entitled to speak their minds, especially on matters involving government, politics, law, foreign policy and other public concerns. We value robust debate because our founding fathers believed that open debate was good in itself and would lead to better public policy, more scientific and technological progress and better artistic expression. That is what the Iraqis admire about us and wish to have for themselves. They are thankful that we have liberated them from the tyrant so that they may now have prosperity through freedom of contract and free speech. Yet, irony of ironies, our own citizens here must now clear our own speech with CPA so that our American values and policies, according to the directive, ''are launched in a coherent and coordinated manner'' pleasing to the Directorate of Strategic Communication of the Coalition Provisional Authority. Having ''launched'' our bombs and won the war quickly, I do not think that this kind of control of free speech is the kind of free speech policy most Americans want us to ''launch'' in Iraq. This Tennessean article is found here: http://tinyurl.com/fsue _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email firstname.lastname@example.org All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk