The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[casi] " last story from Baghdad"

>From The Tennessean  [major US newspaper]

"Federal appellate judge Gilbert S. Merritt of Nashville is in Iraq as one
of 13 experts selected by the U.S. Justice Department to help rebuild Iraq's
judicial system.

Merritt, 67, has made trips to Russia and India to work with their judicial
systems. He has been sending periodic reports to The Tennessean about his
experiences in Iraq and filed this dispatch recently:

'Gag' order contradicts U.S. values Iraqis like

"This is my last story from Baghdad. The so-called "Coalition Provisional
Authority", or CPA, acting through its head, L. Paul Bremer, issued a
''gag'' order two days ago that says:

''Speaking To The Media.
To insure the effective co-ordination of the CPA's message, any plan for a
member of the CPA to talk to the media should first be coordinated with the
Directorate of Strategic Communication.''

The Directorate of Strategic Communication, according to the order, was a
''recent creation designed with the intention of delivering a coherent
strategic information for the CPA.''

The CPA is organized into many separate agencies covering governance,
justice, transportation and communication, health, oil, police, culture,
finance and several others. All persons working or helping these agencies
carry out their tasks are apparently covered by the order prohibiting
speaking to the press unless the speech is cleared first by the Directorate
of Strategic Communication.

I have been informed that this includes any article I may write, or verbal
utterance I may speak, to any members of the press, including my hometown

In my opinion, this is a clear violation of the First Amendment to our
Constitution, which says that our government may not impose any law,
regulation or directive ''abridging the freedom of speech.'' The First
Amendment covers any attempt by our government to control the speech of a
civilian citizen of the United States, with only a few exceptions.

There are many cases in the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals  more
than 2,000  that hold that the Free Speech Clause covers state and federal
officials and employees. Those cases secure to such employees the right to
speak on matters of public concern broadly defined and to converse with the
press and others without abridgment or control.

It is true that the government may restrict the release of classified
information by its employees, and it may regulate speech that could create 
in the words of an old Supreme Court case  a ''clear and present'' danger
for its citizens.

But this limitation on speech is far broader than that. It includes all
speech  ''any plan for any member of CPA to talk to the media.''

Although the order is clearly unconstitutional, in my view, I intend to
comply with its terms from now until I leave Iraq and am no longer subject
to it. I will be leaving in a few days to meet my wife, Robin, in Istanbul
for a few days' vacation before returning home to Nashville.

It is, to say the least, ironic that, as a federal judge, I was asked to
come here to try to help erect and establish constitutional values for the
Iraqis, including the rights of free speech and other civil liberties.

Americans are entitled to speak their minds, especially on matters involving
government, politics, law, foreign policy and other public concerns. We
value robust debate because our founding fathers believed that open debate
was good in itself and would lead to better public policy, more scientific
and technological progress and better artistic expression.

That is what the Iraqis admire about us and wish to have for themselves.
They are thankful that we have liberated them from the tyrant so that they
may now have prosperity through freedom of contract and free speech.

Yet, irony of ironies, our own citizens here must now clear our own speech
with CPA so that our American values and policies, according to the
directive, ''are launched in a coherent and coordinated manner'' pleasing to
the Directorate of Strategic Communication of the Coalition Provisional
Authority. Having ''launched'' our bombs and won the war quickly, I do not
think that this kind of control of free speech is the kind of free speech
policy most Americans want us to ''launch'' in Iraq.

This Tennessean article is found here:

Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit
To contact the list manager, email
All postings are archived on CASI's website:

[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]