The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
Dear List, I hope the following article will show what the real intentions of the PUK really are. It will also explain why I understood the concept of "occupation" in the way I did. Isn't it now clear that whole issue of Kirkuk being "Kurdish" revolves around oil, which is not Talabani's alone to give to foreign companies? Talabani is not only replacing Arab "occupation" by US "occupation" (to use Alaxender's terms, or rather the real autor's terms), he is now giving away Iraq's national oil wealth to foreign companies 31 years after it managed to rescue it from the hands of the same companies. Now the real objectives of the war are becoming more and more apparent. And the real reasons for Talabani's opposition to Saddam's regime are also clear. But we are still being misled to believe that the issue is about right and wrong; about Kurdish rights and about morality. This doesn't leave any doubt about the real face of Talabani, no matter what his apologists try to tell us. HZ -------------- http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=407177 Kurds go it alone with international oil deals Local authorities ignore US administration and seek to lure major companies with generous contracts Andrew Buncombe in Washington 18 May 2003 Kurdish authorities in northern Iraq are offering hugely lucrative oil deals to European and American companies without consulting either the US administration in Baghdad or any other Iraqi groups. The move threatens to raise new problems over the future ownership of Iraq's vast oil reserves. The Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), which controls the Sulaymaniyah region as part of the regional government of Kurdish Iraq, has in recent weeks started seeking investment from international companies interested in oil exploration and production. While most companies appear wary of getting involved in deals with the regional authorities in the absence of a settled – and internationally approved – government in Baghdad, the proposed deals represent a challenge to the US-led occupying force. Some have even suggested the proposals may be an effort by the PUK to present any new government in Baghdad with a fait accompli. Samples of the proposed "production-sharing agreements" seen by The Independent on Sunday reveal that the PUK authorities are offering investors an attractive deal. The initial share of profits would be split 60:40 in favour of the oil company, dropping to around 50:50 once a specified level of production is reached. "They are extremely favourable terms," said Gordon Barrows, of the Barrows Company, a US-based publisher of international oil laws and contracts and the company that obtained the contract. The future of Iraq's oil reserves, which some predictions place at up to 112 billion barrels with more to come, is one of the most contentious issues facing the US and Britain as they seek to rebuild Iraq in the aftermath of the ousting of Saddam Hussein. While both Washington and London denied that oil was a factor in their decision to go to war, many of their critics, including most Iraqis, believe that a wish to secure the world's second largest supplies played a large part in shaping the decision to opt for military action. Washington is keen to use Iraq's oil wealth to at least partly pay for the country's rebuilding. There are few major companies that would not wish to secure deals to develop Iraq's oil reserves, and Mr Barrows said he believed the PUK had proposed the deals to most major firms. Britain's two largest companies, BP and Royal Dutch Shell, have both expressed an interest in doing deals when a government has been established in Baghdad. "We have always said we would be interested in the prospect of investing in Iraq, but that would be when there is a stable, long-term administration there," said David Nicholas, a spokesman for BP. Both he and a spokesman for Shell denied that they had been in talks with the PUK. For its part, the PUK admits that it has been offering the deals. It started sounding out interest last July for production in the Taqtaq area north of Kirkuk, but found no takers. Since the US-led occupation of Iraq the PUK has been offering the deals once again, hoping to increase production in the area, which some sources suggest is only producing 5,000 barrels a day. Mohammed Ismail, director of the PUK's office in Washington, said: "It is true [that we are offering contracts]. I don't know the names of the companies involved." __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email firstname.lastname@example.org All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk