The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
Hi all, Who's to say what the best use of our time is at the moment? Not me. But, at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2855975.stm, it says: > 1353: Britain's Attorney-General Lord Goldsmith confirms in a written > parliamentary statement that war on Iraq would be legal on the grounds > of existing UN resolutions. 'confirms' seems to me to be a suspect choice of word. Glen's posting from August at http://www.casi.org.uk/discuss/2002/msg01239.html, may be helpful on this, although some of the arguments no longer work - eg that now the SC has declared a material breach in 1441. Comments to: email@example.com Best, Jonathan ------- Gonville and Caius College | Cambridge | CB2 1TA tel 01223 521914 | mob 07818 651124 "Who am I to answer these questions? I don't know how we can take this man out. I am just a chef." - Giorgio Locatelli _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email firstname.lastname@example.org All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk