The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[casi] BBC article on Voices in the Wilderness' Iraq Peace Team





Please write your comments about the article.  See comments posted at
the end of the article.

-Rania Masri

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/2246438.stm


Monday, 9 September, 2002, 17:11 GMT 18:11 UK
Briton volunteers as 'human shield' for Iraq

It's not only Iraqi lives that could be at stake if the UK goes to war
with Baghdad. One British peace activist is planning to put his life on
the line, as a "human shield".
In the UK there is little appetite for a war with Iraq, according to the
opinion polls. But few who oppose military conflict would go to the same
lengths as Matt Barr.
If Tony Blair gives the green light for bombing raids, the 21-year-old
peace activist plans to be on the first flight out to Baghdad.

As part of a "peace delegation", Mr Barr hopes his presence would deter
American and British bombers.
His primary role would be to "show solidarity" with the Iraqi people and
"bear witness" to the war.
But with plans to visit key installations such as power stations and
sewage works, the 21-year-old from Chichester, West Sussex, could also
become a "human shield" against the Western forces.
The scenario harks back to the Gulf War of 1991, when Saddam Hussein
detained hundreds of British expatriates and placed them at key
installations as human shields.
Oppose sanctions
So far, Mr Barr is the only British volunteer to sign up to the mission.
He expects to be joined by about 200 American peace volunteers.

The delegation is being organised by Voices in the Wilderness, a charity
which campaigns for an end to economic sanctions against Iraq.
"When you are participating in a non-violent resistance movement there
comes a point where, personally, I have to be willing to put your whole
self into the firing line," says Mr Barr.
Having visited Iraq in December last year and met many "ordinary
people", Mr Barr says he feels "passionately that I couldn't just stand
by and watch this happen".
"The mass of people in Britain are opposed to this war but that's not
having any effect on Tony Blair, which is not how democracy works."
'Many would die'
Sanctions imposed on Iraq following the Gulf War of 1991 have had a
devastating effect on its people, according to Voices in the Wilderness.



Hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children have died as result of being
denied adequate food, clean water and medical facilities, the charity
says.
"Another war with Iraq would be catastrophic for the ordinary people,"
says Mr Barr. "Tens of thousands of people, whose livelihoods are
already hanging by a thread, would suffer. The people of Iraq are as
human as we are, and yet many would die."
Mr Barr rejects claims that he is signing up to a suicide mission.
Whether he would simply visit key destinations, such as water
purification plants, or stay there longer term has yet to be decided by
the charity, he says.
But a campaign co-ordinator in the United States, Kathy Kelly, has said
volunteers should be prepared to face up to the fact "this could be the
last year of their life".
Saddam 'hands-off'
The planned trip has the reluctant sanction of Mr Barr's parents.


"It's difficult for my family. Obviously my parents are worried about
what might happen to me. But they know my strength of feeling on this
and that it's what I have to do."
Voices in the Wilderness grew out of the Gulf War when Western peace
activists opposed to the war camped in the desert on the border with
Iraq.
A committed human rights activist, Mr Barr, who is a trained sound
engineer, devotes much of his time to volunteer charity work.
Is he worried the delegation could be "hijacked" by Saddam Hussein and
activists such as himself used as hostages?
No, he says. The fact that those peace activists on the border were not
allowed into Iraq into 1991, says Mr Barr, leaves him confident Baghdad
will keep a hands-off attitude to the delegation, letting them go about
their own business.

------------
Some of your comments so far:
I don't think it is necessary to go to Iraq to protest. I'm surprised
that there haven't been any mass protests in London yet, given the
feelings of the majority of the people. I for one would join a protest
march through London.
Chris Hurst, UK
Why not - as long as they don't expect the US or UK governments to go in
and rescue them if war does happen.
Theresa, UK
If they think that their paltry presence will do anything to stop a war,
then they are truly naive.
Peter Harrington, United Kingdom
It is their own choice. There is no right or wrong. If someone feels
they have to do it, then that is their choice to make.
Sandra, UK
I think anti-war protesters are the bravest people out there and should
go fight for this cause. Shame on us for a supporting military campaign
in Iraq.
Harris Martin, London, UK
If Mr Barr wants to stop the suffering of the Iraqi people, he should be
protesting against Saddam Hussein, not a military effort to remove him.
Dughall, Scotland
People like Mr Barr need to understand the whole picture and not just
the 10,000 Iraqis who might suffer. If things are left, then a
considerable number more will suffer.
Alex King, UK (Jersey)
Matt Barr is a true hero. May God watch over him!
Rebecca K., Sweden
If Mr. Barr is for peace and justice in the world, he should join the
Royal Marines.
Peter C. Kohler, US
Whilst personally I have yet to be conviced that invading Iraq the best
course of action, I find Mr Barr's intentions at best naive and and
worse idiotic. Does he not realise that he's aiding a dictator who has
in the past gassed his own population? What of their human rights?
D Barnes, UK
I think Matt Barr is very brave. Its good to see that some people are
willing to stand up for what they believe in. As for military action
against Iraq, I believe it should only happen under UN resolution AND if
the US can prove that Iraq has intent to strike at the West, not just if
he has the capability.
Jon Schofield, UK
If they feel so strongly then it is their perogative to go to Iraq. But
they should do so in the certain knowledge that they will have
absolutely no effect in stopping any attack.
Paul, England

Should anti-war protesters put themselves at risk by travelling to Iraq?

Top of Form
Send us your comments:
Name:

Your E-mail Address:


Country:

Comments:


Bottom of Form
Disclaimer: The BBC will put up as many of your comments as possible but
we cannot guarantee that all e-mails will be published. The BBC reserves
the right to edit comments that are published.









_______________________________________________
Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss
To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk
All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk


[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]