The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
News titles, 29/6-6/7/02 I am finding some difficulty in understanding why so many of those who supported the war on Serbia seem to be opposed to the war on Iraq. What are the differences between Slobodan Milosevic and Saddam Hussein? Well, chiefly that Mr Milosevic was democratically elected and was engaged in a war against a terrorist campaign taking place in what is still recognised as being legally part of Serbia. His treatment of ethnic Albanians certainly wasnıt any worse than Mr Husseinıs treatment of the Kurds (which hasnıt been much worse than the Turksı treatment of the Kurds, but thatıs another matter). In fact, prior to the actual launching of the war, any comparison between the two is really outrageous. The Racak massacreı which provided the pretext for the war was small beer compared to the massacres the US have been engaging in in Afghanistan (and the dispute, civilian or terrorist? Greatly resembles the dispute over the latest wedding party massacre). Large sections of European and British opinion need to be told: if the bombing of Serbia was justified then thereıs nothing to be said against the bombing of Iraq; if the bombing of Iraq is wrong, then thereıs nothing to be said in favour of the bombing of Serbia. That having been said, the most depressing piece of news in what follows is to be found in the International section - Eritrea eager for U.S. military partnershipı. Perhaps the breakdown of the talks on weapons inspections is also depressing but it was predictable. Kofi Annan is not a man of moral courage and was not in a position tp offer the terms under which a return of the weapons inspectors would have been acceptable. But the whole thing is farcical since it is perfectly obvious that with the blockade in place around Iraq it is virtually impossible that any substantial quantities of material for weapons opf mass destruction could be getting in. Even when the inspectors were there all their work turned round old stocks not new material. As a pretext for war the weapons of mass destructionı is not so much a fig leaf as a magnifying glass ... FINGER POINTING AT IRAQ * Israelıs submarine menace raises stakes {Details of the latest stage in Israelıs US approved Weapons of Mass Destruction programme. The article ends with a little piece on Iraqıs WMD capacity in 1990/1 which is all that is given here, but the rest of it is interesting for those who like that sort of thing.] * The real case against Saddam [New York Post. Quotes Jesse Helmsı former chief Iraq stafferı, Danielle Pletka as saying: "Nobody credible makes the case that there's some connection between Saddam Hussein and what happened Sept. 11." So much for William Safire et al. Goes on to say that there is nonetheless a demonstrably true case for overthrowing Saddam Hussein. It comes in 4 points. Of these, the first (that Saddam Hussein is clearly evil and reckless) could equally be applied to any US President one might care to name (one would like to make an exception of Carter but he did have Zbigniew Brzezinski for his Secretary of State). The second point - that he is trying to get weapons of mass destruction - has turned out to be as difficult to prove as the connection with Sept 11 (though it is not difficult to prove that Israel is chock a block with them). Only the last two points are demonstrably true: that Iraq is potentially a very strong nation, and that current US policy is unravelling.] * Iraq using new mobile missile launchers: Jane's [At last, solid proof of Iraqıs aggressive intentions] * A shameful attack [Mark Seddon of Tribune criticises John Sweeneyıs Mother of All Ironies programme. Unfortunately he rather leaves the impression that he thought he could control the content of the programme through the privileged position he occupies as the person who can get reporters into Iraq; and is rather miffed that he found he couldnıt. Not the best critique that could have been made of the programme (that was made by MediaLens, circulated to list by Katy Connell on 24th June)] * BBC was fair on Iraq [Letter in reply to above from Mark Damazer, Deputy director, BBC News] IRAQI LIFE AND CULTURE * Iraqi President Discharges 3 Elderly Ministers * Baghdad slams UNESCO over World Heritage List * Diverse Iraqi painting revealed in all its richness IRAQI/INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS (South Africa, Pakistan, India, Czech Republic, Europe, Eritrea, Russia) * Iraqi Deputy Minister Visits SA * Baghdad accepts 31,000 tons wheat * India's FICCI [Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry] to send delegation to Iraq * Iraq denounces the Free Europe radio * EU approves aid package to Iraq [Curious little item that perhaps hasnıt attracted the attention it deserves. Given that we are told the problem does not lie in access to (imported) food and medicines but in infrastructure, is that what the European proposal addresses?] * Eritrea eager for U.S. military partnership [It is deeply distressing to see Eritrea which, some years ago, appeared to me at least to be a beacon to the world, apparently offering to turn itself into a US aircraft carrier: Eritrea could also serve a launching point for a future attack on Iraq, Asmerom (Eritrean ambassador to the US) said.ı * Iraqi Ambassador Talks the Talk [Abbas Khalaf, Iraqıs new ambassador to Moscow.] NORTHERN IRAQ/SOUTHERN KURDISTAN * Kurds grit teeth for US strike [The thesis is that the Kurds donıt want to go to war but will be obliged to do so by the Americans. At present, theyıre happy because they can drink, women donıt have to wear the veil, and they get a monthly food basket, though there is still a lot of poverty. Sounds a bit like the rest of Iraq.] * Restaurant Explosion Injures 20 in Kurdish-run northern Iraq * '88 gassing still killing Iraqi Kurds [John Sweeney, in one of his exchanges with anti-sanctions campaigners, suggested we should go to Halabja. Iıve seeen no sign that Mr Sweeney has ever been to Halabja but this article is by someone who has, and he finds it disgracefully neglected by the international communityı (and by implication the Kurdish authorities). Long term after effects of the 1988 chemical attack havenıt been properly researched, partly for fear of the consequences for the Western firms that supplied the chemicals. The US is willing to use Halabja for propaganda purposes but will do nothing to alleviate the suffering. On the whole its an all round desolating story (one small interesting detail. Halabja is outside the zone protectedı by the US/British air forces.)] * Iraq Turns Up Heat on Ethnic Kurds, Non-Arabs in Kirkuk [The arrival in the autonomous zone of large numbers of Kurds apparently expelled from the Kirkuk region is one of the more serious and verifiable charges that can be made against Saddam Hussein - though John Sweeney wasnıt very interested in it. In this particular article the effect is a little weakened by a young Turkoman who seems to be fleeing one or two yearsı military service. Much as one might sympathise with him on a personal basis, thatıs what military service was until recently in France. The fact that in the Iraqi army he risks being killed is more the fault of those (who include the author of the article) who want to wage war on Iraq. And the way things are going he probably doesnıt have a lot of advantage going to the autonomous zone.] AND, IN NEWS, 29/6-6/7/02 (2) IRAQI/MIDDLE EAST-ARAB WORLD RELATIONS * Iranian pilgrims to Iraq have doubled to 7,000 a week * Jordan denies the existence of American forces to strike Iraq * U.S. buildup in Qatar may foreshadow Iraq attack * Two American secret military bases in Qatar [Arab report in rather imperfect English emphasising Qatari anxiety that their treachery should be kept secret] * Al-Sharq al-Awsat: the next war against Syria [Prospects for an imminent Israeli attack against Syria, possibly under cover of the US war against Iraq.] * Iraq grants Turkish companies oil contracts URLs ONLY: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10739-2002Jul1.html * Arab Report Cites Development Obstacles by Karen DeYoung Washington Post, 2nd July [UN report written by Arabs says Arabs are backward. Still too much interest in matters other than making money.] http://www.dailystar.com.lb/features/01_07_02_a.htm * A way of seeing - book takes look at Arab visual culture by Jim Quilty Daily Star, Lebanon, 1st July [Book on Arab photography - an art form whose very existence shows how far the Arab peoples have fallen since the days when any sort of illusionistic copy of the external appearances of nature was regarded with contempt, and calligraphy was recognised as among the highest forms of human activity.] NEW WORLD ORDER * Policy goes too far to combat terrorism [At last someone - in this case an editorial in the Atlanta Constitution - has noticed that by the standards now being proclaimed by Mr Bush: Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor could be considered a justified pre emptive strike ...ı Only quibble I have is with the reference to our newly aggressive approach.ı How long is it since the US has waged a war that could by any stretch of the imagination be termed defensiveı?] * World exclusive interview: George Michael [Long article from the Daily Mirror (was it all really published) which was, it appears, behind G.Michaelıs recent decision to enter into political, um, debate. Michaelıs main anxiety appears to be that Britain might get attacked, not that we might kill a lot of people He gives the impression of wanting to appease the terrorists to rpevent another September 11th on his doorstep. It really isnıt true to say that Britain's the second most dangerous place on earth right nowı - presumably after the US, but Israel/Palestine, Afghanistan, Somalia , Kashmir etc are still more dangerous than eiter of them. Only a short extract dealing with Iraq is given here (and again, anxiety about what Saddam Hussein might do if cornered prevails over anxiety as to what we might do to Iraq.)] * Rise of a new imperialism [Extract from a new book by John Pilger. He suggests that the new imperialists are losing any inhibitions they may ever have had about behaving like the old imperialists. But he does suggest that they are still inhibited about the name, imperialistı. Has he not read the recent pieces by old Foreign Office hand, Robert Cooper?] * U.S. Is Right to Spurn Int'l Criminal Court [The New York Daily News opposes the International Criminal Court on the grounds that Americans could be subjected to the jurisdiction of a bunch of wogs from worthless places like Lesotho. The paper fears that If the court had existed before now, President Bush, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Secretary of State Powell might be dodging subpoenas. The U.S., after all, has killed civilians in Afghanistan.ı And they may be right. All the courtıs defenders are assuring us that the US has nothing to fear but if it canıt prevent what the US did in Afghanistan then surely it isnıt worth having.] * Liberty Mutual fined for Iraqi dealings * The rogue State [John Pilger attacks the US - mainly on Afghanistan - from the pages of the Daily Mirror. Piers Morganıs commitment to this sort of thing is heartening but it still needs some sort of effective embodiment in politics, outside the Labour Party usual suspectsı group. Are Morgan and the Labour group willing to organise a real opposition (and could they do it without getting nobbled by the SWP?)] URLs ONLY: http://www.cleveland.com/world/plaindealer/index.ssf?/xml/story.ssf/html_sta ndard.xsl?/base/news/102542968797940.xml * Experts fear crude bomb could be built by Charles J. Hanley The Plain Dealer (Cleveland), 30th June [Scary thoughts on the possible proliferation of nuclear materials. But worried as the Americans might be they donıt appear to be that worried: The IAEA's advocates, meanwhile, say it's time the U.N. watchdog agency's budget - long frozen because of Washington's anti-U.N. sentiment - be increased.ı] http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/181/focus/We_ll_strike_first+.shtml * We'll strike first by Robert Schlesinger, 6/30/2002 Boston Globe, 30th June[Reflections on the rights and wrongs of pre-emptive strikes. Problem of arguing why, with the removal of the only serious competing power, one has to become more, not less, aggressive.] http://allafrica.com/stories/200207010293.html * Bridging The Dangerous Gap Between The West And The Muslim World by Paul Wolfowitz Weekly Trust (Kaduna, Africa), 1st July [Second part of a long semi-philosophical reflection by Paul Wolfowitz on the difference between good Muslims (willing to recognise Israel) and bad ones (terrorists). But he doesnıt seem to have explored the question very far: Strikingly, by the way, even in a portion of Iraq -in the Kurdish-controlled areas in the North we see an example of the kind of self-government Muslims can achieve. There, beyond the reach of the Baghdad regime, the people are healthy and they enjoy a level of prosperity that far surpasses the rest of Iraq.ı This is something of an exaggeration but assuming we concede the case we may well wonder: if the Kurds can do so well left to their own devices why isnıt Mr Wolfowitz supporting their autonomy vis a vis Turkey?] http://www.guardian.co.uk/leaders/story/0,3604,747559,00.html * Contempt of court The Guardian, 2nd July [The Guardian waxes indignant about US refusal to countenance the International Criminal Court. But so far as I can see theyıve missed the point. They think the ICC is an extension of the kangaroo courts set up for ex-Yugoslavia and Rwanda. It isnıt. These were responsible to the United Nations Security Council, which is controlled at least negatively by the US (it might not do everything the US wants but it wonıt do anything the US doesnıt want). The US was NEVER going to support an international court not under its control. This is nothing to do with the suspicious, slab-sided rightwing psyche that informs and so badly skewers Bush administration attitudes to most international issuesı. Clinton would have (in fact we are told he did) come to the same conclusion. In refusing the ICC the US is consistent with itself. In backing a court which will do its political will it is acting consistently with itself. In backing a US controlled court and pretending it has international legitimacy (the ex Yugoslavia Tribunal) the Guardian is merely acting consistently with its own delusions of moral grandeur.] http://cgi.worldnews.com/?action=display&article=14457633&template=worldnews /search.txt&index=recent * Cos. Pay Gov't Millions in Fines The Associated Press, 3rd July [Fines for breaking US imposed sanctions on Afghanistan and Cuba] http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/laweekly/20020703/lo/36259_1.html * The Last Defender of the American Republic?: An interview with Gore Vidal by Marc Cooper Yahoo (from Los Angeles Weekly), 3rd July [What makes Gore Vidal particularly interesting is that he represents a substantial American political tradition - isolationism - which probably corresponds to the instincts of many if not most of the US population but which has almost no political expression, except perhaps on the extreme fringes of the extreme right. Which helps to explain Vidalıs sympathetic interest in Timothy McVeigh: And when it comes to Oklahoma City and Tim McVeigh, well, he had his reasons as well to carry out his dirty deed. Millions of Americans agree with his general reasoning, though no one, I think, agrees with the value of blowing up children. ... The whole Patriot movement in the U.S. was based on folks run off their family farms. Or had their parents or grandparents run off. We have millions of disaffected American citizens who do not like the way the place is run and see no place in it where they can prosper. They can be slaves. Or pick cotton. Or whatever the latest uncomfortable thing there is to do. But they are not going to have, as Richard Nixon said, "a piece of the action." The article is long and not much about Iraq so Iım not giving it but its worth having a look at.] http://www.bloomberg.com/fgcgi.cgi?ptitle=Top%20Financial%20News&s1=blk&tp=a d_topright_topfin&T=markets_bfgcgi_content99.ht&s2=ad_right1_topfin&bt=ad_po sition1_topfin&middle=ad_frame2_topfin&s=APSQ54xXXSXJhbiBC * Iran Bond Attracts European Banks Ignoring `Evil' Tag (Update2) by Gavin Serkin Bloomberg.com. 4th July Iran's first foreign bond sale since the Islamic revolution of 1979 is attracting interest from Deutsche Bank AG, Pictet & Cie and other banks who aren't put off by its place in U.S. President George W. Bush's ``axis of evil.''ı The article includes the following curious little tidbit of information: Colm McDonagh, who helps manage $110 million for Aberdeen Asset Management, has about half of his $13 million Exotic Debt Fund invested in Iraqi and North Korean debt, on expectations the loans will be repaid if Saddam Hussein is ousted or the two Koreas reunite. The fund has gained 24 percent this year after dropping by the same percentage in 2001. ³It's toxic stuff, but when it moves, it really moves,'' McDonagh said. ³All we need is one of these countries to happen and our holdings will sky-rocket.'' By happenı I think he means get bombed to piecesı (am I wrong to be reminded of Gogolıs novel Dead Soulsı?)] http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm?storyID=2050431&thesection=news&t hesubsection=dialogue * Deformed US foreign policy obsessed with terrorism by Gwynne Dyer New Zealand Herald, 5th July [Article notable for the following rather witty sentence: The average person's grasp of risk factors is so poor that it's commonplace to meet cigarette smokers who worry about terrorism.ı Also for reminding us of the existence of Haıaretz as an effective centre for Israeli opposition to the Sharon/Bush perspective.] http://www.dailystarnews.com/200207/06/n2070609.htm#BODY3 * Arabs and Red-Indians: Brothers in fate! by Yamin Zakaria Daily Star (Bangla Desh), 6th July [Quite exhilarating piece of Muslim, anti-ıJudaeo-Christianı propaganda. But it may be remarked that, although many Christiansı have been won over to the view that Israel is the homeland for the Jewsı this is not the Christian position, which is that it is now the Christians who are the Jewsı, heirs to the Biblical promises. The people who call themselves Jews are the people who have betrayed their destiny as Jews by failing to recognise the Messiah. Far from supporting the Jewish claim to Jerusalem for religious reasons, Christians should be reasserting their own claim to Jerusalem, for religious reasons. That would throw a spanner in the works ...] http://www.iht.com/articles/63613.html * Changing the Arab world will take people power by David Ignatius International Herald Tribune (from Washington Post), 6th July [An amazing piece of prose which turns President Bushıs recent speech into an expression of concern for the wellbeing of the Palestinian people. Ignatius goes on to argue that though bombs will certainly be necessary to introduce democracy in Arab lands, a bit of funding of dissident movements might not be a bad idea as well]. AND, IN NEWS, 29/6-6/7/02 (3) OIL * GCC states take $20b oil price hit * BAGHDAD: Iraq ups West Qorna output * Iraq to drill wildcats IRAQI OPPOSITION * Iraq rebels oppose U.S strike to topple govt-paper [The Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq, who appeared a few months ago to be toying with supporting the Americans, are beginning to figure out what an American occupation might mean. Not great for champions of the Islamic Revolution ...] * Iraqi exiles dream of toppling Hussein [On the newly formed Iraqi National Movement, the sons of privilege in Iraq wanting their privileges back. But given that they openly support a US invasion of their country why should the Syrians be offering them a base in Damascus?] IRAQIS OUTSIDE IRAQ * Activists accused of 'dumping' asylum-seekers in the desert [in the Woomera breakout] * Officials: Saddam's stepson admits mistake over US visa POLICING THE BLOCKADE * U.S. Bombs Iraqi Defense System PROSPECTS FOR WAR * US has plan to kill Saddam, says Iraqi opposition leader * Time to deploy a large American military force [Jim Hoagland argues for a massive US military presence permanently installed in Iraq as the best recipe for solving the Israel/Palestinian confrontation. The core of his thesis is that once the Arabs get democracy, they will be happy to recognise the state of Israel. He doesnıt quite explain how he makes the connection but we suspect the massive US military presence might have something to do with it (what is behind all this is probably the notion that the Arab world can be remodelled like the Japanese and Germans at the end of the 1939-45 war).] * Failure of other efforts led U.S. to plan war on Saddam [The article turns round the following interesting paragraph: The evidence that Saddam still possesses such weapons remains murky - particularly in the view of America's European allies, most of whom have argued against a new war on Iraq. In the United States and its principal Middle East ally, Israel, however, a number of senior officials - including Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and former Prime Minister Ehud Barak - believe that a post-Saddam Iraq could be fashioned into some form of democracy.ı Interesting because it begins with an important fact that is rarely acknowledged - the near total absence of any evidence that Iraq has access, or is even seeking access - to weapons of mass destruction. But then, with a howeverı, the paragraph changes subjects. The US and Ariel Sharon (!) think Iraq could become democraticı. The next paragraph tells us what the word democraticı means. Iraq is to be conquered and thousands of Iraqis killed in order to secure Israel's eastern flankı. The sentence also reveals what the word terrorismı means willingness to support Palestinian opposition to the Israeli occupation of Palestine. A later paragraph tells us that They [Kurdish leaders] also want Kurdish cities protected from the kind of onslaught that Saddam unleashed during the Clinton administration's failed attempt to dislodge the Iraqi leader. The failure forced the CIA to evacuate partisans from Iraq at a cost of more than $100 million, according to administration officials.ı My understanding is that the partisansı, insofar as they were Iraqi, were left behind and killed. It was the Americans who were lifted out. And as always the author forgets that the Iraqi army was invited in by the KDP in order to prevent a combined Iranian/PUK takeover of the territory.] URLs ONLY: http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/51466.htm * TO INVADE IRAQ:, SEND IN THE 'EXPERTS'! by Ralph Peters New York Post, 1st July [Tough talkinı case, published in the New York Post, for stomping on Saddam Hussein with massive force: First, that sucker needs to go down, and he needs to go down ugly. The world needs to see pain on his decomposing snout so that all the other scumbag dictators in the Middle East and elsewhere get the message that the gringos are back in the game and feeling mean. Bring down one dictator, and the next 10 will think twice before they mess with Uncle Sugar and the Stars and Stripes. That's real pre-emption.ı Want to read any more?] http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/05/international/middleeast/05IRAQ.html * U.S. Plan for Iraq Is Said to Include Attack on 3 Sides by ERIC SCHMITT New York Times, 5th July [This has achieved some publicity but I donıt see anything in it we havenıt had before. With the administration constantly talking up the need for regime change it is hardly surprising that the Pentagon is drawing up all sorts of plans, but, as the article says: Nothing in the Central Command document or in interviews with senior military officials suggests that an attack on Iraq is imminent.ı In fact it appears that the document has been leaked by someone (I wonder can we guess who. Would the name begin with D, by any chance?) who is dissatisfied with the present state of preparations for war.] IRAQI/UN RELATIONS * UN: United Nations Compensation Commission approves awards of USD4.9Bn for compensation [The absurdity of the figures cited in this article is staggering. Note the website address: www.uncc.ch (when I tried it it worked, but became www.unog.ch/uncc/] * UN deal leaves Iraq's Kurds at mercy of Baghdad [This is a rather more detailed version of the charge levelled by John Sweeney that Baghdad prevents the flow of essential supplies to the Kurdish north. What is surprising is that no-one (least of all Sweeney) seems to be making the obvious point that the Kurdish autonomous zone, supposedly outside the administration of the wicked Baghdadis, shouldnıt be subject to sanctions at all, or at least should be supplied directly and not through UN agencies based in Baghdad. One can only guess that the obstacle is Turkey, but are the Turks so mighty that they can prevent the question even being discussed?] * Iraq, UN fail to agree on arms inspections _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk