The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[casi] Fw: [iac-disc.] Nuking Mecca

[ Presenting plain-text part of multi-format email ]

Dear All
Another "Civilized" solution !!!!
Ghazwan Al-Mukhtar
Baghdad, Iraq

----- Original Message -----
From: Luis Jose Fernandez Ordoņez
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 10:14 AM
Subject: [iac-disc.] Nuking Mecca

Editor suggests "Nuking Mecca"

Washington (CAIR) - CAIR is calling on Muslims to contact the National Review and demand an apology 
for published statements by editor Rich Lowry who suggested that "nuking Mecca" would "send a 
signal" to Muslims. (National Review online,, calls itself "America's 
premier conservative website.")

In an online forum called "The Corner," editor Rich Lowry wrote on March 7:
"Lots of sentiment for nuking Mecca. Moderates opt for something more along these lines: "Baghdad 
and Tehran would be the likeliest sites for a first strike. If we have clean enough bombs to assure 
a pinpoint damage area, Gaza City and Ramallah would also be on list. Damascus, Cairo, Algiers, 
Tripoli and Riyadh should be put on alert that any signs of support for the attacks in their cities 
will bring immediate annihilation..."

"This is a tough one, and I don't know quite what to think. Mecca seems extreme, of course, but 
then again few people would die and it would send a signal. Religions have suffered such 
catastrophic setbacks before...And, as a general matter, the time for seriousness-including 
figuring out what we would do in retaliation, so maybe it can have some slight deterrent effect--is 
now rather than after thousands and thousands more American casualties."

National Review writer Rod Dreher also took part in the discussion of an attack on Mecca. He wrote: 
"...I'd say Baghdad, Tehran and Riyadh should make the list, tout ensemble, and maybe even 
Damascus. As for Mecca, well, it would feel good, but we'd have every Muslim on the planet enraged 
unto ages of ages...

"These statements are a call to violence against Muslims and Islam. Inflammatory rhetoric 
suggesting mass murder and the destruction of religious sites is wildly irresponsible and beyond 
the bounds of reasoned debate. The National Review should apologize immediately and discipline 
Lowry and Dreher for their offensive remarks. Hate speech can never be justified or excused," said 
CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad.

Awad added that these statements are part of a disturbing trend in which some commentators attack 
the faith of Islam under the cover of political debate. (Lowry now says his remarks were merely 
"sarcastic.") In a September column published on National Review, Ann Coulter wrote: "...We should 
invade their [Muslim] countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity."

      Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

*** Iraq Action Coalition Discussion Forum ***
*To Post a message, send it to:
*To Subscribe, send a blank message to:
*To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to:
* To see the List Guidelines, go to:
*Any questions, contact the List Moderator at

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit
To contact the list manager, email
All postings are archived on CASI's website:

[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]