The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a
Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author,
not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search]
[List information]
[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mortality estimates in Iraq
- From: John Smith <johncsmith@DELETETHISbtinternet.com>
- Subject: Re: Mortality estimates in Iraq
- Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 23:50:45 +0000
The question "how many Iraqi civilians have been killed by economic sanctions" is a false one.
The UN Security Council's Humanitarian Panel reported in March 1999 that
“the humanitarian outlook will remain bleak and become more serious
with time…the Iraqi people would not be undergoing such deprivations in the
absence of the prolonged measures imposed by the Security Council and the
effects of war.”
As these clear and objective words indicate, it is impossible to separate
the effects of "economic sanctions" from the effects of the military attacks
on Iraq in 1991 and since. They are bound up together; they are both part
of the same war.
It also follows that it is arbitrary to oppose "economic sanctions" while
remaining neutral on the wider war against Iraq. I would almost say "illogical",
but there is a logic to this stance, and this logic is a dangerous one, so
it seems to me. This is the logic of implicit or explicit acceptance of the
imperialists' strategic aims, of their right to intervene, to "contain Saddam,"
to "preserve stability"... while offering tactical criticisms and advice: "sanctions
are counter-productive"; "they hurt the people but not the regime" etc.
Concerning numbers... it seems to me that the scientific and objective approach
is to do exactly what UNICEF and other UN agencies attempt to do in their
reports: to extrapolate mortality trends from the period before sanctions
and bombs and compare these with the actual reality. On this basis, here
in Sheffield we have no hesitation in citing UN sources for our assertions
that 1.5 million Iraqis have been killed as a result of US/UK policies.
It could be argued that this is a simplistic approach, in that the divergence
between extrapolation and reality could also be due to the Saddam regime
deliberately intensifying civilian suffering in order to generate anti-Western
propaganda. This is exactly what Blair, Cook, Albright et al argue... but
since the Saddam regime is itself the illegitimate offspring of the imperialists'
century-long rape of Iraq, then the US and UK governments must be forced
to take responsibility for all of these deaths.
Greetings,
John S
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a discussion list run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq
For removal from list, email soc-casi-discuss-request@lists.cam.ac.uk
Full details of CASI's various lists can be found on the CASI website:
http://www.casi.org.uk
[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]