The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
Following are the web addresses for the U.S. State Department's special briefing on Iraq (September 13, with Spokesman James Rubin and Undersecretary Martin Indyk): > Report (new): http://www.usia.gov/regional/nea/iraq/iraq99.htm > Transcript: http://www.state.gov/www/policy_remarks/1999/990913_indyk_rubin.html Also following is a list of reportage: > BBC: http://news2.thls.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/americas/newsid%5F446000/446544 .stm > LATimes: http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/ASECTION/t000082127.html > WashPost: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/1999-09/14/045l-091499-idx.html > Reuters: http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/990913/9z.html > AP: http://www.infobeat.com/stories/cgi/story.cgi?id=2561144780-01b All rebuttals welcome ... ... though the point may be moot. Following is a Reuters update from today's London meeting of the 'permanent five' that reports: "One delegate said that for the first time, the United States and Britain agreed to discuss suspending sanctions on Iraqi imports of civilian goods as well as oil export limits if Baghdad cooperated with a new U.N. disarmament system." Regards, Drew Hamre Golden Valley, MN USA --- U.N. Powers Report Progress On Iraq Sanctions 03:04 p.m Sep 15, 1999 Eastern By Paul Taylor, Diplomatic Editor LONDON (Reuters) - The five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council made progress Wednesday in narrowing differences on conditions for easing sanctions on Iraq but an agreement cannot be guaranteed, Britain said. After a day of talks among senior officials of the United States, Russia, Britain, France and China, a British Foreign Office spokesman said: ``Progress was made but eventual success is not certain.'' One delegate said that for the first time, the United States and Britain agreed to discuss suspending sanctions on Iraqi imports of civilian goods as well as oil export limits if Baghdad cooperated with a new U.N. disarmament system. U.S. officials declined to confirm or deny the report. If confirmed, it would be a major concession by Washington, which has so far insisted the import restrictions must remain to prevent President Saddam Hussein reconstituting chemical and biological weapons stocks. The sanctions have been in place since the 1990-91 Gulf conflict that followed Iraq's invasion of Kuwait and they have caused severe hardship in the once oil-rich nation. The British spokesman said ambassadors and senior officials of the Big Five would meet in New York later this week and early next week to prepare for a five-power foreign ministers' meeting during the United Nations General Assembly next week to seek agreement on a Security Council resolution. ``There is no guarantee this will be achieved, but we must explore the possibilities to create a united Security Council position to put pressure on Iraq to meet its international obligations,'' the spokesman added. REVIVING ARMS INSPECTIONS International monitoring of Iraq's suspected weapons of mass destruction programs collapsed last year when U.S. and British forces staged a four-day air attack to punish Baghdad for obstructing the U.N. inspectors. Diplomats said the most constructive feature of Wednesday's meeting was that it focused on the principles of a new arms control regime and incentives for Iraq to cooperate, rather than raking over old differences among the big powers or haggling over rival draft resolutions. ``There was enormous progress because we agreed on the broad lines of how a new disarmament commission would be set up and what it would do, and how it could be packaged attractively to Iraq,'' one delegate said. Once appointed, the new body would have 60 days to establish a work program for completing Iraq's disarmament and setting up long-term monitoring, and Baghdad would have to comply for a trial period before the Security Council decided to suspend sanctions. He said the political directors did not discuss the length of the trial period, the duration of the suspension or how it could be renewed or repealed. Such details could yet be sticking points. The source said the agency and its head would have to be seen as more politically neutral than the previous U.N. Special Commission headed by Australian Richard Butler, which Iraq regarded as taking its orders from Washington. Iraq has vowed not to let inspectors back in. Deputy Prime Minister Tareq Aziz reiterated Baghdad's position that it would accept nothing less than a complete lifting of the sanctions. ``We are not concerned with this meeting,'' he told reporters in Baghdad before the outcome of the London talks was known. ``Our legitimate demands are known: the condemnation of the aggression against Iraq and the lifting of the embargo. Anything less than this will not be accepted by the steadfasting (Iraqi) people.'' France, Russia and China had pushed for import sanctions to be suspended if Iraq cooperates while Washington and London opposed any loosening of the import ban, although they were willing to allow foreign investment in Iraq's vital oil and gas sector in due course. Saddam has made only limited progress in ending Iraq's international isolation and breaking down the wall of sanctions amid an intensifying propaganda war with Washington. Iraq chaired a meeting of Arab League foreign ministers this week and is stepping up a campaign to highlight the plight of Iraqi civilians, particularly children, under sanctions. The United States has reacted by accusing Saddam of starving his own people. Diplomats note that, with the U.S. presidential campaign gathering steam, the window for Washington to make any substantial concession on easing sanctions could close soon. British officials say they hope to get a resolution passed by the end of September. Copyright 1999 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a discussion list run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To be removed/added, email firstname.lastname@example.org, NOT the whole list. Please do not sent emails with attached files to the list *** Archived at http://linux.clare.cam.ac.uk/~saw27/casi/discuss.html ***