The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[casi] Oh No! It was about oil.



You would never know this from the recent Bush speech. All about the war on
terrorism and liberating Iraq as metnioned in Hopperger's post. Umpteen
times he mentions 9/11.  So Powell is going to get the US, through a
"democratic" Iraq of course, to set up a system through which SOME of the
oil revenues will be go to the Iraqi people! Who gets the rest? Those
Americans are generous to a fault. They  invade and seize Iraqi assets and
now they are going to ensure that some of the income from them actually goes
back to them. They should be thumping their chests, as Garner says, these
morally superior thieves.

Cheers, Ken Hanly

http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000087&sid=ahJS35XsmXGg&refer=top
_world_news

U.S., U.K. Waged War on Iraq Because of Oil, Blair Adviser Says
By James Kirkup
London, May 1 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. and U.K. went to war against Iraq
because of the Middle East country's oil reserves, an adviser to British
Prime Minister Tony Blair said.

Sir Jonathan Porritt, head of the Sustainable Development Commission, which
advises Blair's government on ecological issues, said the prospect of
winning access to Iraqi oil was ``a very large factor'' in the allies'
decision to attack Iraq in March.

``I don't think the war would have happened if Iraq didn't have the
second-largest oil reserves in the world,'' Porritt said in a Sky News
television interview.

Opponents of the war, including some members of Blair's Labour Party, have
said that the conflict was aimed at securing Iraqi reserves to benefit
Western economies and oil companies. U.S. and U.K. leaders have repeatedly
rejected that, saying the war began because Iraq held illegal weapons and
threatened other countries.

Blair has said he wants Iraqi oil revenues to be held in a United
Nations-run trust fund and spent on rebuilding Iraq. Secretary of State
Colin Powell said yesterday the U.S. may encourage Iraq to set up an oil
revenue-sharing system that would distribute some proceeds from what he
called the ``marvelous treasure'' to Iraqi citizens.

Oil production in Iraq was halted before the U.S.-led attack that toppled
President Saddam Hussein. According to UN data, the nation is losing about
$55 million a day in oil revenue as the U.S., the European Union and the
Iraqi people debate postwar reconstruction plans.

Porritt's commission was set up in 2000 to advise the U.K. government on
making economic and business activity compatible with
environmental-protection policies. The body reports directly to Blair.

This isn't the first time Porritt has criticized the U.K. government. In
October 2000, he said Blair and his ministers had failed to fulfill election
promises on ecological issues.

Last Updated: May 1, 2003 06:39 EDT



_______________________________________________
Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss
To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk
All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk


[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]