The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[casi] Sistani's call for immediate elections

Sistani's call for immediate elections

Excerpt from below:


Professor Cole, how would you explain Sistani's insistence on direct
elections right now?

Sistani's call for immediate elections

JUAN COLE: Well, Sistani is a genuine democrat. He believes that sovereignty
resides in the body public. And so if you're going to have a government
that's legitimate, it has to be elected by the people on a
one-person/one-vote basis.

JIM LEHRER: And no other political agenda other than that?

JUAN COLE: Well, he knows, obviously that the majority of Iraqis is Shiite
and therefore a one- person/one-vote type of election will return a majority
Shiite government and certainly he believes that that's what Iraq should



Full text:

Iraq's senior Shiite cleric, Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, claims the
coalition's plan to transfer power does not pay proper heed to Islam. Kwame
Holman reviews the role of religion in the governance of Iraq. Then, Jim
Lehrer follows up with Juan Cole of the University of Michigan and Gary Sick
of Columbia University.

KWAME HOLMAN: When major combat ended in May, one of Iraq's leading
religious figures urged his fellow Shia Muslims not to resist occupying
troops, a statement welcomed by U.S. Officials. He is 73-year-old Grand
Ayatollah Ali Sistani, the highest ranking Shiite cleric in Iraq. In June,
he issued a religious decree, a fatwa, that criticized U.S. Administrator
Paul Bremer's plan to handpick a provisional government to draft a new

Sistani wrote, "The occupation officials do not enjoy the authority to
appoint the members of a council that would write the constitution. General
elections must be held so that every eligible Iraqi can choose someone to
represent him."
But the American timetable, formed with the U.S.-appointed Iraqi Governing
Council, would have delayed elections until a constitution was written.
Bremer spoke on the NewsHour in September.

L. PAUL BREMER: The Iraqis don't have a constitution. They need one, and you
really can't get to sovereignty without elections, and you can't have
elections without a constitution.

KWAME HOLMAN: U.S. officials said direct elections would pose a series of
practical problems. Iraq has no voting rolls, no updated census. And, U.S.
officials said, an election could be marred by continued violence. But
Sistani, whose influence is believed to be widespread among Iraq's Shia
majority, stood firm. The competing visions left the governing council
deadlocked. And in November, as attacks on Americans increased, the
administration changed course.
Bremer presented a new political plan, one that would allow indirect
elections by regional Iraqi caucuses. But last week, Sistani criticized the
new plan. He again demanded direct elections both for the constitutional
conference and for a new provisional government. In written comments to the
Washington Post, Sistani said the plan "does not guarantee the establishment
of an assembly that truly represents the Iraqi people." A member of the
Iraqi governing council who met with Sistani said the cleric also wants to
ensure the new government respects Islamic principles.

ABDEL-AZIZ AL-HAKIM, Iraqi Governing Council: (Translated): Ayatollah
Sistani is deeply concerned over certain loopholes that he feels have to be
resolved. Otherwise the process will be deficient and will not meet the
expectations of the people of Iraq. Ayatollah Sistani found nothing that
preserves Islamic identity.

KWAME HOLMAN: Despite Sistani's views and influence, several news
organizations reported today that a majority of the governing council
disagrees with him, and continues to back the U.S. approach.

JIM LEHRER: For more on this , we go to Juan Cole, professor of history at
the University of Michigan. He recently authored a modern history of Iraqi
Shia entitled, "Sacred Space and Holy War." And to Gary Sick, who served on
the National Security Council staff under Presidents Ford, Carter, and
Reagan. He now teaches Middle Eastern politics at Columbia University.
Professor Cole, how would you explain Sistani's insistence on direct
elections right now?

Sistani's call for immediate elections

JUAN COLE: Well, Sistani is a genuine democrat. He believes that sovereignty
resides in the body public. And so if you're going to have a government
that's legitimate, it has to be elected by the people on a
one-person/one-vote basis.

JIM LEHRER: And no other political agenda other than that?

JUAN COLE: Well, he knows, obviously that the majority of Iraqis is Shiite
and therefore a one- person/one-vote type of election will return a majority
Shiite government and certainly he believes that that's what Iraq should

JIM LEHRER: Gary Sick, how do you see this?

GARY SICK: You've got to remember that Sistani is perhaps the sole
legitimate force in Iraqi politics today. Ayatollahs are not appointed; they
are elected by their own people. Their people basically vote by giving them
respect and money and support. And so he represents a body of people who in
effect have elected him, and he is perhaps the only elected official -- he's
not an official -- but he's the only elected person in Iraqi politics. That
gives him tremendous legitimacy, much more so than any of the other
institutions. And I think what we're seeing here is a struggle between his
concept of legitimacy and that of the governing council and the American
occupying force.

JIM LEHRER: Well, Professor Cole, what about this idea of how you hold
general elections? One of the suggestions that Sistani and his folks have
made is that you could put together voting rolls from the food rolls, the
old U.N. food rolls. Does that make sense to you?

JUAN COLE: Well, it certainly could be done. I don't think that there's any
legitimate objection to holding elections if the problem is how to do it. I
think that it could be accomplished. The problem is that the U.S. does not
want to hold popular elections at this stage in the process because it is
afraid that those elections will throw up leaders who will down the road
become obstacles to progress. This happened in Eastern Europe, in Bosnia
after the war there. And it's a bad experience that the U.S. has that the
people who can survive a Milosevic or a Saddam are thugs, are radicals, and
if they get elected, then they can stop further progress.

JIM LEHRER: Do you see it the same way, Gary Sick, that the U.S. is
concerned not so much about democracy per se obviously but what the end
result might be if it happens too early?

GARY SICK: I think that's very true. I think the U.S. is worried about two
things. One, speed, and I think they do want to have a provisional
government in place by July 1. We're working not only on the Iraqi calendar
but we're working on the U.S. electoral calendar at the same time. But the
same thing, you've got to realize that the way the situation is now
structured is that the governing council that is appointed by the United
States will, in fact, have a dominant role in choosing everybody in that
initial vote to determine who is going to be in the provisional government
and then who is going to write the constitution. It gives the United States
a tremendous amount of authority in determining who gets to become a member
of the provisional government when, in fact, the U.S. occupation technically
ends next July.

The U.S. plan for regional caucuses

JIM LEHRER: You make a good point. Let me walk through this and you all jump
in and correct me if I've got this wrong. As you say, Gary Sick, the
governing council will set up a procedure where these regional caucuses
will, in fact, elect people who will then become... who will go to Baghdad
and become the provisional government, is that correct?
GARY SICK: I think that's roughly correct, yes. And the thing is that these
caucuses in the various 18 provinces are, in fact, going to be appointed.
There are fifteen people and five of them will be appointed by the governing
council that now exists and ten more will be selected with their approval.
So it basically means that the United States through the governing council
will have control of that process at every stage.

JIM LEHRER: And this, Professor Cole, is what Sistani does not like, right?

JUAN COLE: Well, it should be remembered that many of those caucus delegates
will be chosen by municipal councils which in turn have been appointed by
the U.S. Military. Many of the people chosen by the U.S. Military are
alleged to have been former Baathists. There might be a slight Sunni
tendency there because they were, after all, the ones who knew how to run
things. And Sistani is very concerned that the Shiites will be marginalized
yet again as they were when the British took over in the 1920s.

JIM LEHRER: Now, Gary Sick, the other part of this... of Sistani's problem
was that I think the word was that the... that he was concerned that it does
not... the Islamic identity is not preserved in the new government, the way
he sees this procedure as its currently laid out. What's he talking about?
How do you interpret that?

GARY SICK: Well I'm not entirely sure of what he means by that, but he
clearly -- on one hand, Sistani is not one of the people who has been
pushing hard for a clerical rule, that is to have a clerical takeover like
in Iran. Instead, he has indicated that he is... he is prepared to live with
the government which is respectful certainly of Islam and has an Islamic
I really think it does come back to the fundamental democratic issue that he
does see the legitimacy and sovereignty lying in the body politic. He wants
to see that body politic represented. And, of course, this reflects his
interests because he is Shia and 60 percent of the population as Juan Cole
said are Shia also.
The influence of Islam in Iraqi government

JIM LEHRER: But you agree, Juan Cole, that he's not... you agree with Gary
that the ayatollah does not want an Islamic government in the way we know an
Islamic government through Iran, right? I mean he wants a secular government
but with a strong Islamic influence of some kind?

JUAN COLE: He doesn't want an Iran-type of government where the ayatollahs
and the clerics actually rule. He thinks that clerics should stay in the
seminary and the mosque and they should issue rulings on essentially social
matters. He doesn't want them running the government. But on the other hand,
he does want an Islamic government.
What he means by that is that he wants Islamic law to be the law of the
land. And he wants the clerics to be the judges. So he wants the clerics to
have their influence through law and through the judiciary rather than in
the executive branch or necessarily in the legislature. He wants guarantees
that the legislature won't pass laws that directly contradict his
interpretation of Islamic law.

JIM LEHRER: But Gary Sick, that could be talking about women's rights, all
kinds of things and pluralism as in religious freedom for Christians and
others. This is not a simple matter, is it?

GARY SICK: It is not, especially in a country that has as many different
factions and groups and sectarian beliefs as Iraq does. It's going to be
very difficult to govern that country. And that is something that clearly is
going to be a problem. It is already being reflected in the fact that the
governing council, which pays attention to Sistani and takes him seriously,
is also arguing with him.

JIM LEHRER: All right. Now, let's go to the bottom line here beginning with
you, Juan Cole. I mean, how far can the United States go or the governing
council and the United States together go in saying, "thank you, Mr.
Ayatollah, but no, thank you, we're going to go ahead and do it our way"?
How powerful is he right now in being able to have his way, or have
consequences if he doesn't get his way?

 Will Sistani block the U.S. plan?

 JUAN COLE: Well, Sistani has enormous authority, as Gary Sick said. Most
Shiites in Iraq if you ask them who do you follow, they will say Sistani. So
if he wanted to make trouble, he could. However, he is from that quietist
tradition of Najaf that believes that the clerics ought not to get involved
too closely in day-to-day governing affairs. He is trying to intervene
strategically on what he sees as constitutional issues.

I think it's very unlikely that he would call for massive demonstrations
against the U.S. or the interim governing council if he is rebuffed. I think
he will issue his fatwa, his ruling. I think it will affect people's
consciences. It will affect how they view the legitimacy of the transitional
government but I don't think he will launch a social movement against the
U.S., at least in the short term.

JIM LEHRER: You're nodding in agreement, Gary Sick.

GARY SICK: Yes, very much so. I don't see him calling for demonstrations. On
the other hand, the key element of the new government, if it's going to
govern and it's going to handle this really very complicated situation in
country, is it's going to have to have real legitimacy. And I'm afraid that
if they go too obviously against his ideas, that they're going to have a
legitimacy problem later on where the people will say, you know, you're
there but you're really a creature of the Americans. You're not really an
Iraqi government. We don't trust you.

JIM LEHRER: Does he have the power, Gary Sick, to just to -- at least from
his perspective -- to declare this government illegitimate?

GARY SICK: Well, again, I would find it... I don't anticipate that certainly
not in the short term. He has been very cooperative thus far with the
American occupation, but he is insisting that certain procedures be followed
in order to go on from here. And he's quite prepared to wait longer than the
Americans are prepared to wait.

JIM LEHRER: Now, Juan Cole, I found interesting reading today that for all
of his power and influence, he has refused thus far to talk directly to Paul
Bremer. What's that all about?

JUAN COLE: Well there's a saying in Islam that the worst of the clergy are
those who associate with princes. The Najaf tradition declines to be in
direct consultation with authority and certainly with authority that it
considers less than legitimate. Actually here I disagree with my colleague
Gary Sick. I've seen a fatwa from Sistani, which declares the present
interim governing council illegitimate. He means by that that... that it
doesn't spring from the Iraqi people. It's not in accordance with Islamic
law and so forth. So, I think he just doesn't want to get involved with the
Americans in a direct sort of way.

JIM LEHRER: But if they go ahead and do it their way rather than his way,
would he have the power to keep this thing from functioning? I mean, is he
that serious an obstacle if he decides to become that, Juan Cole?

JUAN COLE: Well, if he were to decide to take a direct role, yes, I think he
could be a big obstacle because, after all, the U.S. is not liked by many of
the Sunni Arabs and were the Shiites to turn against it in a big way, that
might make the government untenable. But I don't think Sistani wants to rock
the boat that hard. He just wants to intervene to make sure as far as he can
that the moral guidance is there for how Iraq should develop.

JIM LEHRER: Okay. Gentlemen, thank you both very much.

Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit
To contact the list manager, email
All postings are archived on CASI's website:

[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]