The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
Iraq security deters western firms October 14, 2003 - 12:07PM Western firms are reluctant to play a role in the reconstruction of Iraq because of security concerns and a lack of clarity about the contracts on offer, a conference in London has heard. Acknowledging disquiet among companies over the way sub-contracting work has been handed out by the US companies leading the work to rebuild Iraq, the United States is creating a new agency, under the aegis of the Pentagon, a US defence official told delegates. The new agency, as yet unnamed, will be introduced at the beginning of November under the direction of retired admiral David Nash, said the Deputy Under Secretary of Defence for International Technology Security, John Shaw. It will be charged with coordinating the distribution of sub-contracting work in Iraq, notably by US groups Bechtel and Halliburton, the main contractors in Iraq's reconstruction. Shaw admitted there were "divergences" over the process between the US Agency for International Development (USAID) - which awarded the main contracts under the supervision of the State Department - and the Pentagon. An Iraqi businessman at the conference, called "Doing Business in Iraq", lamented that the process of awarding sub-contracts in Iraq was "so slow, bureaucratic, and not very fair". To win a contract "you have to be there," Mustafa Al-Hijaj, head of development at the Iraqi company Al-Hameediyaih Co Ltd, which has managed to secure work from Bechtel to help to repair Iraq's water treatment systems. The most important thing to do was to form an alliance with local people, he told AFP. The US administration was represented by several officials at the conference, which also heard calls for Western firms to set aside their fears about the rising violence in Iraq and to help to rebuild the war-torn country. "If you don't participate in reconstruction now, it will affect your position" in the future, said Rubar Sandi, a Kurdish-American who is advising the interim Iraqi authorities. "Whether you are pro-war or against war is irrelevant now. We have a country to rebuild," said Sandi, the owner of the Baghdad Hotel, the target of a car bomb on Sunday that killed eight people. Sandi, chief executive of the US investment bank CorporateBank Business, confided that his brother had been seriously hurt in the attack, but he argued that to not invest in Iraq would only reward the terrorists. Mustafa Al-Bunnia, vice president of the Iraqi company Al-Bounnia, the country's biggest conglomerate, flew over from Baghdad to attend the gathering. "Iraqis are hungry to prove themselves," he told delegates. But he warned: "Don't expect when you arrive in Baghdad to find the right person right away". This story was found at: http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/10/14/1065917386035.html _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email firstname.lastname@example.org All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk