The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[casi] War Criminals Hire War Criminals to Hunt Down War Criminals

... War Criminals Hire War Criminals to Hunt Down War Criminals ...

1) Die Laughing
2) U.S. Recruiting Hussein's Spies



Global Eye -- Die Laughing

By Chris Floyd
Here's a headline you don't see every day: "War Criminals Hire War Criminals
to Hunt Down War Criminals."

Perhaps that's not the precise wording used by the Washington Post this
week, but it is the absolute essence of its story about the Bush Regime's
new campaign to put Saddam's murderous security forces on America's payroll.

Yes, the sahibs in Bush's Iraqi Raj are now doling out U.S. tax dollars to
hire the murderers of the infamous Mukhabarat and other agents of the
Baathist Gestapo -- perhaps hundreds of them. The logic, if that's the word,
seems to be that these bloodstained "insiders" will lead their new imperial
masters to other bloodstained "insiders" responsible for bombing the UN
headquarters in Baghdad -- and killing another dozen American soldiers while
Little George was playing with his putts during his month-long Texas siesta.

Naturally, the Iraqi people -- even the Bush-appointed leaders of the
Potemkin "Governing Council" -- aren't exactly overjoyed at seeing Saddam's
goons return, flush with American money and firepower. And they're certainly
not reassured by the fact that the Bushists have also reopened Saddam's most
notorious prison, the dread Abu Ghraib, and are now, Mukhabarat-like,
filling it with Iraqis -- men, women and children as young as 11 -- seized
from their homes or plucked off the street to be held incommunicado,
indefinitely, without due process, just like the old days. As The Times of
London reports, weeping relatives who dare approach the gleaming American
razor-wire in search of their "disappeared" loved ones are referred to a
crude, hand-written sign pinned to a spike: "No visits are allowed, no
information will be given and you must leave." Perhaps an Iraqi Anna
Akhmatova will do justice to these scenes one day.

However, the sahibs' unabashed embrace of their soulmates in the Saddamite
security forces did provide some sinister comedy in the Post story. The wary
reporters and Raj officials displayed the usual hilarious delicacy in coming
up with reality-fogging prose to protect the tender sensibilities of the
American people, who must never be told what their betters are really
getting up to.

For example, the U.S. alliance with Saddam's killers -- yes, the very ones
who inflicted all those human rights abuses which, we're now told, was the
onliest reason the Dear Leader attacked and destroyed a sovereign nation in
an unprovoked war of aggression -- was described demurely as "an unusual
compromise." (As opposed to, say, "a moral outrage," or "a putrid stain on
America's honor," or "a monstrous copulation of rapacious conquerors with
bloodthirsty scum.") However, the Post hastens to assure us that the wise
sahibs do recognize the "potential pitfalls" of hooking up with "an
instrument renowned across the Arab world for its casual use of torture,
fear, intimidation, rape and imprisonment."

Those kidders! Surely they know this "potential pitfall" is actually one of
the main goals of the entire bloody enterprise: to intimidate the "Arab
world" until they straighten up and fly right -- i.e., turn their countries
over to Halliburton, Bechtel and the Carlyle Group. That's why you buy an
"instrument" like the Mukhabarat in the first place. You certainly don't
employ professional murderers and rapists if you are genuinely interested in
building a "decent, open, democratic society," as the Bushists claim in
their imperial PR.

But like vaudeville troupers of old, the media-sashib double act saves the
best gag for last. First the Postmen present the seamy Bush-Mukhabarat
humpa-humpa as some great spiritual agon -- "an ongoing struggle between
principle and-the practical needs of the occupation" -- instead of what it
is: business as usual for the American security apparatus, which happily
incorporated scores of its Nazi brethren into the fold after World War II,
and over the years has climbed into bed with many a casually raping and
murdering thug -- such as, er, Saddam Hussein, who spent a bit of quality
time on the CIA payroll.

In fact, the entire Baathist organization -- including the Mukhabarat -- was
midwifed into power by not one but two CIA-backed coups, as historian Roger
Morris reports in The New York Times. And shall we mention the intimate
relations between Saddam's regime and U.S. intelligence services back when
Saddam was merrily gassing his own people -- and the Iranians -- with the
eager connivance of Ronald Reagan, George Bush I and their "special envoy"
to Baghdad, Donald Rumsfeld? Yes, let's.

So the new alliance is no "struggle:" It's a veritable Bush family reunion,
a happy homecoming for Rummy and his old Mukhers. But "this eternal blazon
must not be to ears of flesh and blood" -- or to Post readers, anyway. Our
vaudevillians, eager to keep the fleecy Homeland flock nestled comfortably
in its cozy amnesia, skip the history and go straight to the punchline: Raj
officials say that it's OK to hire the most hardcore killers, rapists and
torturers -- as long as you "make sure they are indeed aware of the error of
their ways."

You guys! What yocks! "So, Mr. Mukhabarat Man, are you indeed aware of the
error of your ways?" "Oh yes, boss, I got my mind right!" "Not going to rape
or torture anybody anymore?" "Oh no, boss, no -- not unless you tell me to!"
"Okey-dokey then! You're hired! Get on over to Abu Ghraib -- you've got some
interrogating to do!"

What? It's not funny? What do you mean? Look at those Iraqi kids over there,
those American soldiers -- they're grinning from ear to ear! No, wait --
that's just their skulls. The new Bushabarat are using them for soccer



U.S. Recruiting Hussein's Spies
Occupation Forces Hope Covert Campaign Will Help Identify Resistance
By Anthony Shadid and Daniel Williams
Washington Post Foreign Service
Sunday, August 24, 2003; Page A01

BAGHDAD, Aug. 23 -- U.S.-led occupation authorities have begun a covert
campaign to recruit and train agents with the once-dreaded Iraqi
intelligence service to help identify resistance to American forces here
after months of increasingly sophisticated attacks and bombings, according
to U.S. and Iraqi officials.

The extraordinary move to recruit agents of former president Saddam
Hussein's security services underscores a growing recognition among U.S.
officials that American military forces -- already stretched thin -- cannot
alone prevent attacks like the devastating truck bombing of the U.N.
headquarters this past week, the officials said.

Authorities have stepped up the recruitment over the past two weeks, one
senior U.S. official said, despite sometimes adamant objections by members
of the U.S.-appointed Iraqi Governing Council, who complain that they have
too little control over the pool of recruits. While U.S. officials
acknowledge the sensitivity of cooperating with a force that embodied the
ruthlessness of Hussein's rule, they assert that an urgent need for better
and more precise intelligence has forced unusual compromises.

"The only way you can combat terrorism is through intelligence," the senior
official said. "It's the only way you're going to stop these people from
doing what they're doing." He added: "Without Iraqi input, that's not going
to work."

Officials are reluctant to disclose how many former agents have been
recruited since the effort began. But Iraqi officials say they number
anywhere from dozens to a few hundred, and U.S. officials acknowledge that
the recruitment is extensive.

"We're reaching out very widely," said one official with the U.S.-led
administration, who like most spoke on condition of anonymity because of
sensitivity over questions of intelligence and sources.

Added a Western diplomat: "There is an obvious evolution in American
thinking. First the police are reconstituted, then the army. It is logical
that intelligence officials from the regime would also be recruited."

Officials say the first line of intelligence-gathering remains the Iraqi
police, who number 6,500 in Baghdad and 33,000 nationwide. But that force is
hampered in intelligence work by a lack of credibility with a disenchanted
public, and its numbers remain far below what U.S. officials say they need
to bring order to an unruly capital. Across Iraq, walk-in informers have
provided tips on weapons caches and locations of suspected guerrillas, but
many Iraqis dismiss those reports as haphazard and sometimes motivated by a
desire for personal gain.

The emphasis in recruitment appears to be on the intelligence service known
as the Mukhabarat, one of four branches in Hussein's former security
service, although it is not the only target for the U.S. effort. The
Mukhabarat, whose name itself inspired fear in ordinary Iraqis, was the
foreign intelligence service, the most sophisticated of the four. Within
that service, officials have reached out to agents who once were assigned to
Syria and Iran, Iraqi officials and former intelligence agents say.

For years, U.S. relations with both Syria and Iran have remained tense and,
if anything, have deteriorated since American forces overthrew Hussein's
government on April 9. Once-vigilantly patrolled borders stretching hundreds
of miles are remarkably porous, and L. Paul Bremer, the U.S. civilian
administrator of Iraq, has openly accused Syria of allowing foreign fighters
to enter Iraq. A senior American official said those fighters inside Iraq,
mainly from Saudi Arabia and Syria, number between 100 and 200.

The emphasis on intelligence mirrors a decision earlier this month by Lt.
Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, the commander of U.S. ground forces, to minimize large
military sweeps to the north and west of Baghdad. Launched in June and July,
the sweeps rounded up hundreds of Iraqis, but angered residents who
complained of mistreatment, arbitrary arrests and humiliation at the hands
of U.S. soldiers.

Sanchez and others have suggested that the anger caused by those raids could
bolster the support for guerrillas, who are thought to number in the
thousands, mainly in the Sunni Muslim-dominated regions that provided
Hussein much of his support.

The guerrilla tactics have grown in sophistication over the four months of
the occupation. But U.S. officials said the guerrillas remain decentralized,
with no sign yet of national coordination. In the view of Bremer, a former
counterterrorism specialist, and other U.S. officials, their amorphous
nature makes them harder to stamp out, and makes more pressing the need for
intelligence to pinpoint raids and create the possibility of infiltrating
the groups.

"The expectation is that we're going to have to fight it out," one senior
official said.

The official said it might require 500,000 U.S. troops, perhaps far more, to
secure every potential target in the country -- an unlikely prospect, given
that many U.S. allies are balking at the prospect of sending more soldiers,
especially without a U.N. mandate. The United States has 132,000 troops in
the country, and there are 17,000 other soldiers, the majority of them

"The key is to try to stay ahead of this game and prevent it from
happening," the senior official said.

At a news conference today, Bremer repeatedly stressed the need for better
intelligence, saying that U.S. authorities were "constantly working to
refine and upgrade our intelligence capabilities."

The goal, he said, was "to find and, if necessary, kill as many of them as
possible before they find and kill us."

Hussein's security forces were a suffocating presence in Iraq and still cast
a long shadow.

Of the four security branches, the Mukhabarat was the best-treated and often
supplied agents for the other branches. The largest was internal security,
known as Amn al-Amm, which focused on domestic intelligence. The third was
special security, which protected government officials. These three answered
to the presidency. Only military intelligence was nominally independent of
Hussein's inner circle and operated within the Defense Ministry. The Baath
Party, with membership in the millions, provided a check of sorts, with its
almost endless network of informers in every town and village.

Within the Mukhabarat, former intelligence officers say, the branches
dedicated to Iran, Israel and, during the 1990s, the United Nations were the
most important. One officer, a 23-year veteran who spied on the United
Nations, said about 100 agents worked on Iran, between 75 and 100 on the
United Nations and 50 each on Israel and Syria, in addition to their
networks and contacts.

Earlier this summer, Bremer dissolved those services, along with the
information and defense ministries. But Wafiq Samarrai, a former military
intelligence chief who went into exile in 1995 and retains contacts, said
U.S. officials were seeking to reconstitute them in some form. "They are
trying to rebuild it very quietly," he said.

One officer, who was not contacted by the Americans, said he believed that
about 300 people were being recruited. Adil Abdul Mahdi, the director of the
political bureau for the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq,
one of the groups taking part in the Governing Council, said his
organization has a list of almost 20 names of recruited officers from the
dreaded Fifth Section, an organ inside military intelligence that focused on
Iran. He said his group believed that at least one of those agents was sent
to the United States for training last month. An official with the U.S.-led
administration said he was not aware of agents having been sent to the
United States.

While not disclosing how they check the operatives, U.S. officials said they
believed some agents remained "fairly untainted" by Hussein's government.
But they said they recognized the potential pitfalls in relying on an
instrument loathed by most Iraqis and renowned across the Arab world for its
casual use of torture, fear, intimidation, rape and imprisonment.

"We have to be very careful in how we vet them, in how we go through their
backgrounds," the senior American official said. "We don't want to put a
cancer right in the middle of this."

Another official called the recruitment part of an ongoing struggle between
principle and what he called the practical needs of the occupation.
"Pragmatically, those are people who are potentially very useful because
they have access to information, so you have to compromise on that," he
said. "What we need to do is make sure they are indeed aware of the error of
their ways."

While many Iraqi officials say they are aware of the recruitment, some have
spoken against the use of former operatives, and others have warned against
reconstituting an intelligence service before an independent Iraqi
government takes charge. Former exiles who cooperated with the Americans
were trailed by Iraqi intelligence for years, and among them the issue is
particularly sensitive. "We've always criticized the procedure of recruiting
from the old regime's officers. We think it is a mistake," Mahdi said.
"We've told them you have some bad people in your security apparatus."

The objections come in the context of a struggle between Bremer and the
Governing Council over the degree of Iraqi control over the security
services. Bremer said today that despite Iraqi objections, security will
remain in the hands of U.S. forces. But many Iraqis, both former operatives
and U.S.-allied officials, are dismissive of the U.S. ability to run
intelligence inside the country. They say U.S. officials lack the means to
recruit effective networks and are overwhelmed with information of dubious

"There's a difference between how we perceive things and how they react,"
said one council member. "There's no quick response to intelligence. The
Americans have huge quantities of it, most of it nonsense. They have no
means of distinguishing."

Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit
To contact the list manager, email
All postings are archived on CASI's website:

[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]