The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[casi] Robert Fisk August 24

We Have A Long And Dishonourable Tradition Of Smearing The Dead

Let us remember Ahmed Hanoun Hussein, Mazen Dana, Twefiq Ghazawi, Bahij
Mentni, Rachel Corrie and Dr David Kelly

Robert Fisk

24 August 2003: Across the marble floor of the Shrine of the Imam Hussein in
Kerbala scampers Suheil with his plastic bag of metal. He points first to a
red stain on the flagstones. "This was a red smoke grenade that the
Americans fired," he tells me. "And that was another grenade mark." The Shia
worshippers are kneeling amid these burn marks, eyes glistening at the gold
fašade of the mosque which marks the very place, behind silver bars kissed
by the faithful, where - in an epic battle far more decisive in human
history than any conflict fought by the United States - Imam al-Hussein was
cut down in AD680. There is a clink as, one by one, Suheil drops his
souvenirs on to the marble.

US forces denied that any ordnance fell upon the shrine when they opened
fire close to the Huseiniya mosque last month. Of course they denied it.
Denial has become a disease in Iraq - as it has through most of the Middle
East. The Americans deny that they kill innocent civilians in Iraq - but
kill them all the same. The Israelis deny they kill innocent civilians in
the occupied territories - indeed, they even deny the occupation - but kill
them all the same. So folk like Suheil are valuable. They expose lies. The
evidence, in this case, are his little souvenirs. On one of the grenades in
his plastic bag are written the words "Cartridge 44mm Red Smoke Ground
Marker M713 PB-79G041-001". Another is designated as a "White Star Cluster M
585", yet another carries the code "40mm M195 KX090 (figure erased)
010-086". They are strange things to read in a religious building whose
scholars normally concentrate on the minutiae of Koranic sura rather than
the globalised linguistics of the arms trade.

But one of the Kerbala shrine's guards, Ahmed Hanoun Hussein, was killed by
the Americans when they arrived to assist Iraqi police in a confrontation
with armed thieves near the shrine. Two more Shias were shot dead by the
Americans during a protest demonstration the next day.

Suheil insist that the US troops wanted to enter the mosque - an unlikely
scenario since they are under orders to stay away from its vicinity - but
four bullets did smash into an outer wall. "We are peaceful people - so why
do we need this?" Suheil asks me plaintively. "Remember how we suffered
under Saddam?" And here he points upwards to another sacrilegious assault on
the shrine, this time amid the gold of one of the two principal minarets - a
shrapnel gash from a shell fired by Saddam's legions during the great Shia
revolt of 1991, the rebellion we encouraged and then betrayed after the last
Gulf War.

So you'd think, wouldn't you, that the shootings at Kerbala were an
established fact. But no. The US still insists it never fired into the
shrine of the Imam Hussein and "has no information" on the dead. Just as it
had "no information" about the massacre of at least six Iraqi civilians by
its soldiers during a house raid in the Mansour district of Baghdad a month
ago. Just as it has no information on the number of Iraqi civilian
casualties during and after the illegal Anglo-American invasion, estimated
at up to 5,223 by one reputable organisation and up to 2,700 in and around
Baghdad alone according to the Los Angeles Times.

And I've no doubt there would have been "no information" about the man shot
dead by US troops outside Abu Ghraib prison last week had he not
inconveniently turned out to be a prize-winning Reuters cameraman. Thus
Mazen Dana's death became a "terrible tragedy" - this from the same American
authorities whose Secretary of State Colin Powell thought that the tank fire
which killed another Reuters cameraman and a Spanish journalist in April was
"appropriate". Of course, the Americans didn't hesitate to peddle the old
lie about how Dana's camera looked like a rocket-propelled grenade - the
same cock-and-bull story the Israelis produced back in 1985 when they killed
a two-man CBS crew, Tewfiq Ghazawi and Bahij Metni, in southern Lebanon.

But there's a far more hateful bit of denial and hypocrisy being played out
now in the US over two young and beautiful women. The first, Private Jessica
Lynch, is feted as an American heroine after being injured during the
American invasion of Iraq and then "rescued" from her Iraqi hospital bed by
US Special Forces. Now it just happens that Private Lynch - far from firing
at her Iraqi attackers until the last bullet, as the Pentagon would have had
us believe - was injured in a road accident between two military trucks
during an ambush and that Iraqi doctors had been giving her special care
when Lynch's "rescuers" burst into her unguarded hospital. But the second
young American is a real heroine, a girl called Rachel Corrie who stood in
front of an Israeli bulldozer that was about to demolish a Palestinian home
and who was killed - wearing a clearly marked jacket and shouting through a
loudspeaker - when the Israeli driver crushed her beneath his bulldozer and
then drove backwards over her body again. All this was filmed. As a Jewish
writer, Naomi Klein, bravely pointed out in The Guardian, "Unlike Lynch,
Corrie did not go to Gaza to engage in combat; she went to try to thwart
it." Yet not a single American government official has praised Rachel
Corrie's courage or condemned her killing by the Israeli driver. President
Bush has been gutlessly silent. For their part, the Israeli government tried
to smear the activist group to which Rachel Corrie belonged by claiming that
two Britons later involved in a suicide bombing in Tel Aviv had attended a
memorial service to her - as if the organisers could have known of the
wicked deed the two men had not yet committed.

But there's nothing new in smearing the dead, is there? Back in Northern
Ireland in the early 1970s, I remember well how the British Army's press
office at Lisburn in Co Antrim would respond to the mysterious death of
British ex-soldiers or Englishmen who were inconveniently killed by British
soldiers. The dead were always described as - and here, reader, draw in your
breath - "Walter Mitty characters". I used to get sick of reading this smear
in Belfast Telegraph headlines. Anonymous army officers would pass it along
to the press. The guy was a Walter Mitty, a fantasist whose claims could not
be believed. This was said of at least three dead men in Northern Ireland.

And I have a suspicion, of course, that this is where Tony Blair's adviser
Tom Kelly first heard of Walter Mitty and the ease with which authority
could libel the dead. Born and bred in Northern Ireland, he must have read
the same lies in the Belfast papers as I did, uttered by the same anonymous
army "press spokesmen" with as little knowledge of Thurber as Mr Kelly
himself when they spoke to journalists over the phone. So from that dark war
in Northern Ireland, I think, came the outrageous smear against Dr David
Kelly, uttered by his namesake to a correspondent on The Independent.

So let us remember a few names this morning: Ahmed Hanoun Hussein, Mazen
Dana, Tewfiq Ghazawi, Bahij Metni, Rachel Corrie and Dr David Kelly.

All they have in common is their mortality. And our ability to deny their
deaths or lie about why we killed them or smear them when they can no longer
speak for themselves. Walter Mitty indeed!

Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit
To contact the list manager, email
All postings are archived on CASI's website:

[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]