The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[casi] Has Blair Sexed Up Saddam's Atrocities, Too?

Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 06:30:38 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [ei] Aug 6: News & Analysis
Message-ID: <>



6 August 2003


(9) Has Blair Sexed Up Saddam's Atrocities, Too?

By John Laughland

The Mail on Sunday
3 August 2003

As Tony Blair waltzed out of his final press conference and off to
Barbados last week, he once again sidestepped crucial questions on Iraq.
Indeed, faced with the collapse of his pre-war "intelligence" on Iraqi
weapons of mass destruction, Tony Blair is falling back on human rights
abuses committed by Saddam Hussein as the new justification for his war.

In the past ten days, Mr. Blair has said at least three times - including
once on the floor of the House of Commons - that the United Nations is
claiming that some 300,000 bodies lie in mass graves in Iraq, and that
this alone justifies the US-UK invasion.

In making this claim, Blair is doing with this evidence exactly what he
did with the intelligence about weapons of mass destruction.

He is stretching it to the limit, and even telling a partial untruth; he
is obscuring the bits which contradict his view of the world; and he is
attributing an authority and a reliability to the information which it
does not have.

First, the figure does not come from the United Nations. Blair has
emphasised the UN as the source, and stressed that the figures does not
come from the British or American governments. But the real source is a
private non-governmental organisation in America called Human Rights
Watch. UN officials may have lent credence to the
figure by quoting it in their speeches, but it is not an official UN

Nor is it an official Red Cross figure. The International Committee of
the Red Cross is the body which is responsible in international law for
establishing the names of people missing in conflict. It is not the role
of a private, unaccountable organisation like Human Rights Watch. While
Red Cross officials in Geneva say they might privately accept it as a
working basis for evaluating the scale of their task, they absolutely
refuse to give the figure their official support. "We would not say that
there are 300,000 people missing in Iraq," Antonella Notari, a spokesman,
told me.

Human Rights Watch currently has two staff in Iraq. This compares with
about 800 Red Cross staff, and a substantial United Nations presence. The
International Committee of the Red Cross has had people in Iraq ever
since 1980, and the United Nations has had a huge operation there since
the end of the Gulf War in 1991. By contrast, Human Rights Watch has had
its few staff in the main part of Iraq only for the last few weeks.

Moreover, Blair is quite wrong to imply that the 300,000 figure (which in
any case he has inflated a little from the actual Human Rights Watch
figure of 290,000) is the numbers of people killed by Saddam. This is not
even what Human Rights Watch claims. Their report speaks of an estimated
290,000 missing, "many of whom are believed to have been killed". In
other words, their deaths have not
been established, and some or all of them may still be alive.

The methods used by Human Rights Watch to calculate these numbers are
questionable. They do not have anything like complete lists of the names
of people missing. Nor do they even seem to know how many names are on
the lists they do have. How can you claim to have reliable information
about missing people if you do not even know their names?

In the past, these methods have led to appalling exaggerations of the
numbers of people killed in conflict. In the Kosovo war of 1999, Human
Rights Watch stated categorically that the number of people killed
unlawfully by the Serbs was "certainly" more than 4,300. This was the
number of bodies which had by then been exhumed. Moreover,
Human Rights Watch claimed to have itself documented 3,453 killings,
based on interviews. But the legal indictment against Slobodan Milosevic,
the former president of Yugoslavia, refers to 564 killed, not thousands.

In fact, the Human Rights Watch figures are not even their own figures.
Instead, they come from other people. One of their main sources is the
Kurds in Northern Iraq. They can hardly be regarded as neutral observers.
For the last twenty years, the Kurds have been fighting the Iraqis for
their autonomy. In the very bloody, decade-long Iran-Iraq war, they sided
with Iran, a massive and very powerful country. The Kurds present Iraqi
military action against
their forces as "genocide", which Human Rights Watch does too.

But this presentation of the Kurds as passive victims is absurd. In 1996,
when the two Kurdish factions started to fight each other, one of them
asked Saddam to send the Iraqi army to help, which he did. Moreover, my
sources within one of the two groups, the Patriotic  Union of Kurdistan,
confirm that the PUK has its own death squads,
which it uses to eliminate political enemies. How many of these victims
are being counted by Human Rights Watch or Tony Blair?

Because the figures come from other people, even Human Rights Watch does
not present them as anything other than estimates. Although Tony Blair
speaks as if the figure has been firmly established, the actual Human
Rights Watch report is massively hedged around with qualifiers.

Caution should also be exercised because of the unreliability of
eye-witness accounts which have not been subject to judicial
cross-examination. Human Rights Watch did not start to interview the
witnesses of one of the worst alleged atrocities until between four and
five years after the events. Some of the evidence is clearly unreliable.
One report quotes a man saying, "They blindfolded us ... and then they
put us in Landcruisers with shaded windows." But how could he know the
make of the car, or the colour of the windows, if he was blindfolded? The
same man claims to have escaped alive from a mass grave, a story I have
heard too many times in Kosovo to find easy to believe.

No one would deny that huge numbers of people have died in Iraq in the
last two decades. The Iran-Iraq war claimed hundreds of thousands of
lives. Huge numbers were killed by the Americans in the first Gulf War,
and their bodies were sometimes bulldozed into mass graves. Amnesty
International reckons that Saddam executed a few hundred people a year.
If true, it is an appalling level of violence - so why exaggerate it? It
is, incidentally, far lower than the rate at which we have killed Iraqi
civilians in the war on Saddam. The civilian death toll in the last few
months is at least 6,000.

But people do have an extraordinary tendency to exaggerate the figures
whenever mass killing is alleged. In May, a mass grave was discovered
near the town of Hilla: the BBC correspondent, Stephen Sackur, said, "I
have personally counted 200, 300 bodies." But which had he counted? 200
or 300? Within hours, the numbers were inflated from a few hundred to
3,000 and then to 10,000 or 15,000. The
official from Human Rights Watch alleged to me that "tens of thousands of
bodies" had already been exhumed in Iraq. But when I pressed him on this,
he had to admit that the figure was, in fact, in the low thousands.

Tony Blair has come very close to meeting his own political death for
sexing up information about weapons. It seems that he simply cannot get
out of the habit where human rights abuses are concerned.


The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit to sign up today!

Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit
To contact the list manager, email
All postings are archived on CASI's website:

[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]