The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [casi] America's Uday and Qusay Conjuring Trick

>Another sane, reliable source of information then ...

I would say not less reliable than Amnesty
International's dissemination of the lies regarding
the incubators, nor worse than Middle East Watch's
claims that the "allied" bombing campaign of 1991 was
"in many if not most respects... consistent with [its]
stated intent to take all feasible precautions to
avoid civilian casualties."

Is it the contention that because Vialls condemns
Israel's terrorism, we should consider his views less
"sane" than those of Greenpeace which in 1991 praised
the US-led coalition for making a "real effort to get
their unfortunate calling over as quickly as
possible," and "paving the way for positive new
standards for humanitarian and military conduct." ??

Just some questions, lest we let our personal views
and biases become restricting of our abilities to view
issues from all perspectives..


Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software

Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit
To contact the list manager, email
All postings are archived on CASI's website:

[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]