The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
Given the recent discussion on the List concerning the board of Human Rights Watch, the following piece by Manning Marable regarding Lyndon La Rouche - the founder and contributing editor of 'Executive Intelligence Review', articles from which Andreas has posted to the list on a number of occasions - seems appropriate. Best wishes, Gabriel ******************************************* No Compromise with Racism: Farrakhan, Chavis and Lyndon La Rouche - Part Two of a Two Part Series Along the Color Line by Dr. Manning Marable, Jan. 24, 1997 The Columbus Free Press More than a decade ago, fascist leader Lyndon La Rouche and his National Democratic Policy Committee (NDPC) were widely recognized by many African-American leaders and civil rights organizations as a dangerous anti-black cult. In the Atlanta Voice (April 17, 1986), the A. Philip Randolph Institute declared that "La Rouche appeals to fear, hatred and ignorance. He seeks to exploit and exacerbate the anxieties and frustrations of Americans by offering an array of scapegoats and enemies -- Jews, Zionists, international bankers, Blacks, labor unions -- much the way Hitler did in Germany." African-American leader Julian Bond accused La Rouche in 1985 with "using the elderly and the politically unsophisticated to promote his brand of right-wing totalitarianism, his alliance with Nazis and the Klan, his support for the white supremacists in South Africa, and for President Reagan's 'Star Wars' Program." The young African-American activist then heading the United Church of Christ's Commission of Racial Justice, the Reverend Benjamin Chavis, declared that "the La Rouche organization is clearly racist." It was during the Reagan administration, however, that the La Rouchites decided to shift their rhetoric and political strategy regarding African-Americans. Perhaps La Rouche took careful notes from Reagan's cultivation of a coterie of black apologists for political reaction, such as economist Thomas Sowell, television journalist Tony Brown, Civil Rights Commission chairman Clarence Pendleton, and Equal Opportunity Commission Clarence Thomas. In any case, in 1984-85 La Rouche concluded that an anti-black, fascist current could be cultivated inside the black community. In January 1995, one of La Rouche's front organizations held a march in Washington, dedicated in honor of Martin Luther King, Jr.'s birthday. The NDPC began to recruit black candidates for local public office. Meanwhile, La Rouche continued to raise millions of dollars and expand his influence among disaffected whites. In the 1984 presidential campaign, La Rouche himself spent $6 million and won 79,000 votes running as an "independent" Democrat. La Rouche also observed the powerful support generated by the Rainbow Coalition and Jesse Jackson's presidential campaign, as well as the widespread popularity among young black people of Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan. As late as March, 1985, La Rouche's New Solidarity newspaper was bitterly denouncing Farrakhan for "building a Nazi-communist terrorist movement closely linked to the Greens and their backers in the United States." But in subsequent years, the La Rouche organization began to reach out to the Nation of Islam. According to the La Rouche publication New Federalist of September 28, 1990, Dr. Abdul Alim Muhammad, an NOI spokesman, told a meeting of La Rouchites: "To Mr. Lyndon La Rouche and his wife, and to those members of his organization, especially those of his organization ... who put out the New Federalist newspaper and the Executive Intelligence Review, I want to say on behalf of Minister Louis Farrakhan and the entire Nation of Islam, how much we admire you and respect you for the great work that you are doing." The NOI publication The Final Call (Dec. 24, 1990) reported that Dr. Abdul Alim Muhammad spoke in Paris at a La Rouche-sponsored conference. What are the black community's interests as related to Lyndon La Rouche? For twenty years, La Rouche and his fascist cult have not changed one bit. They resort to any kind of attacks, verbal and even physical, to silence their critics. Their goals are white supremacy, racial segregation and an authoritarian corporate state. That some misguided African-American ministers, community leaders and activists have been duped into supporting this reactionary agenda is regrettable. But I challenge Chavis and Farrakhan to have a full disclosure on their full political relationship with La Rouche. We all want black unity, but not at any price. When a national black political meeting has a notorious white racist on its public platform, even when he is booed off the stage, African- Americans must demand an explanation. There can be no compromise with Lyndon La Rouche or any of his friends and associates, black or white. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Dr. Manning Marable is Professor of History and Director of the Institute for Research in African-American Studies, Columbia University, New York City. "Along the Color Line" appears in over 300 publications throughout the US and internationally. ----- Original Message ----- From: "AS-ILAS" <AS-ILAS@gmx.de> To: "nagy" <email@example.com>; "casi" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 7:01 PM Subject: Re #2: [casi] sent to BBC 's "Have your say" re Dr. Kelly Dear Tom and all, Pipes & consorts and the Iraq Dossier Hoax ... and so much more... + some links alone (!) from the Executive Intelligence Review. Best Andreas ------------------ http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2003/3007neocon_hoax.html This article appears in the February 21, 2003 issue of Executive Intelligence Review. Behind the Iraq Dossier Hoax: Intelligence Was Cooked in Israel by Jeffrey Steinberg According to media accounts, the 10 Downing Street "dossier," cited favorably by U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell in his disastrous Feb. 5 report to the United Nations Security Council, was plagiarized from an American graduate school paper, based on information more than a decade old. The scandal that erupted when the Blair dossier hoax hit the press, seriously undermined the credibility of those war party advocates of an immediate Anglo-American invasion of Iraq. As Lyndon LaRouche wrote, Powell was set up by a gang of public relations flacks who can't think straight. So far so good. But a deeper probe into the scandal reveals that there was good reason that the spin-meisters at the Coalition Information Center-the Washington-London civilian government propaganda unit that crafted both the Blair dossier and major portions of Secretary Powell's own lighter-than-air book of evidence-did not reveal the sources of their information. The entire cooked intelligence picture was "Made in Israel." It was cooked up at a right-wing think-tank complex notorious as a hotbed of radical Likudnik propaganda, and with links to the Office of Vice President Dick Cheney, via his Chief of Staff Lewis Libby and his former client, Marc Rich. The essential facts are as follows: Two days before Powell's UN appearance, 10 Downing Street issued a 16-page paper, "Iraq: Its Infrastructure of Concealment, Deception, and Intimidation," purportedly based on high-level British intelligence data. In fact, at least 11 of the 16 pages were lifted, verbatim, from an Israeli journal, Middle East Review of International Affairs, whose sole proprieter is Dr. Barry Rubin, an American-born Israeli citizen. The 11 pages were drawn from two articles, by Ibrahim al-Marashi and Robert Rabil, that appeared in the September 2002 edition of that journal. Al-Marashi's article, a profile of Iraqi intelligence, was drawn, largely, from Iraqi government documents confiscated during the 1991 Persian Gulf War. Al-Marashi, in turn, heavily footnoted his article to other, earlier stories published in Rubin's obscure online journal, by Amazia Baram, the journal's deputy editor. This was no bit of grammar school plagiarism. The public relations team that put together the Blair and Powell propaganda drivel were themselves linked to Rubin and his fellow Israeli pranksters, through Ahmed Chalabi's discredited and corrupt Iraqi National Congress (INC). Chalabi, University of Chicago protégé of the late utopian Albert Wohlstetter, then fugitive swindler, was adopted as the Iraqi oppositionist-of-choice by Israeli "X Committee" agent and chairman of the Defense Policy Board Richard Perle and his British Arab Bureau handler, Dr. Bernard Lewis, in the 1980s. Rubin and the Chicken-hawk Intelligence Agency Rubin issued a statement following the Downing Street dossier flap, taking full credit for the cooked intelligence report. His only complaint was that, while the Blair government apologized to Al-Marashi, they did not issue a similar public statement of regret to him and his journal. To have done so would have been suicidal, as a quick review of Rubin's pedigree makes clear. According to three current biographies, Prof. Barry Rubin is the deputy director of the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies in Israel, and a senior fellow at Hebrew University's Harry Truman Center and Haifa University's Jewish-Arab Center. He is the director of the Global Research in International Affairs Center, research director of the Lauder School of Government Policy and Diplomacy, and a senior fellow at the International Center for Counterterrorist Policy (ICT)-all of which are part of the Interdisciplinary Center, Israel's first private university, in Herzliya. The Lauder School was named after Ronald Lauder, the former Reagan Ambassador to Austria, former president of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, soon-to-be-successor of Edgar Bronfman Sr. as head of the World Jewish Congress, and a notorious financier of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The ICT, which co-sponsored a May 26, 2002 Herzliya center conference on suicide terrorism with the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai Brith, is financed by the Marc Rich Foundation, the tax shelter of fugitive Russian Mafiya don Marc Rich. Avner Azulay, a former Mossad officer and director of the Rich Foundation, is an ICT director. Another publicly listed associate of the ICT is Maj. Gen. Meir Dagan, one of Ariel Sharon's most notorious thugs, and the current head of the Mossad. Rubin, a transplanted Israeli citizen, still spends a good deal of time in the United States. On Feb. 4, he was one of the speakers at a Willard Hotel luncheon in Washington sponsored by Eleana Benador Associates, a New York City public relations firm that counts among its clients the entire chicken-hawk apparatus. Among the other speakers with Rubin were Benador clients Perle, Michael Ledeen, Frank Gaffney, Laurie Mylroie, former UN weapons inspector Richard Spertzel, and former Iraqi weapons scientist Khidhir Hamza. Rubin is also the chief Middle East columnist for Conrad Black's Hollinger Corp.-owned Jerusalem Post, and a senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP), the think-tank spawn of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the official Israel lobby in America. His writings frequently appear in Middle East Quarterly, the hyper-shrill propaganda journal of Daniel Pipes. Rubin and Pipes are both funded by the Bradley Foundation, one of the quartet of ultra-right-wing tax-exempt funds, along with the Smith Richardson Foundation, the Olin Foundation, and the Mellon Scaife Foundation. Typical of Rubin's prolific writings was a Dec. 3, 2002 Op-Ed in the Wall Street Journal, entitled "Sharon the Centrist?" The article celebrated Sharon's Likud party primary victory over Netanyahu, and assailed both Netanyahu and the Labor Party candidate, Gen. Amram Mitzna, whom Rubin labelled an apologist for the Yasser Arafat whom he termed an unrepentant terrorist. In his Benador schpiel, Rubin echoed Perle and Doug Feith's "A Clean Break" strategy, arguing that the U.S. invasion of Iraq and the overthrow of Saddam Hussein would herald the "third Arab revolution" of the postwar period, triggering a spontaneous outbreak of democracy, human rights, and free trade throughout the Arab world. Rubin's simplistic fantasy of a Middle East re-made in the American-Israeli image has prompted some genuine experts to denounce him as the "Bernard Lewis for dummies." Princeton Professor Lewis is the author of the "Arc of Crisis" strategy for permanent instability in the Middle East. The Coalition Information Center It takes two to tango. The Blair dossier-based on the cooked-in-Israel propaganda of Rubin-and the Powell UN speech, were both largely the work of the Coalition Information Center (CIC), an Anglo-American government propaganda unit set up to counter opposition to the U.S. bombing of Afghanistan, and later transformed into a permanent shared venture of the White House and 10 Downing Street. According to recent news accounts in New Yorker magazine and the New Republic, the CIC was the brainchild of Gen. Wayne Downing (USA-ret.)-who was chief of counter-terrorism at the National Security Council until last June-and his deputy, former CIA officer Linda Flohr. The two hired a discredited public relations firm, the Rendon Group, which had a reputation for burning through government cash, but which had been instrumental in the launching of Chalabi's INC. Downing, before joining the White House team, was the "military advisor" to the INC. In mid-February, Downing was in India, as part of a delegation from the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), another thinly-disguised Israeli espionage and recruiting front which targets retired American military and intelligence officers. John Rendon, a Jimmy Carter-era Democratic National Committee executive director, made his connections to Team Bush in 1989, when he handled the propaganda for the overthrow of Gen. Manuel Noriega. In Panama, Rendon hooked up with CIA Iran-Contra operative Flohr, who got Rendon the propaganda contract for Operation Desert Storm. In 1991, President Bush signed a Presidential Finding, authorizing a covert campaign to overthrow Saddam Hussein, and Rendon got an estimated $150 million in CIA cash to manufacture a Potemkin Village opposition to the Baghdad regime, built around Chalabi. According to investigative reporters Seymour Hersh and Jeff Stein, most of the CIA money went to overpaid public relations consultants, posh London flats, flights on the Concorde, and even more suspect cash diversions. Ultimately, the CIA Inspector General got into the act, and Rendon was dumped by the Agency. Things improved for this crowd, once again, when "Bush 43" came to town. Flohr, who had gone to work for the Rendon Group after retiring from the CIA in 1994-and working for Oliver North's bullet-proof vest company-was tapped by Downing to join him at the National Security Council (she is now officially listed as the director of counter-terrorism for the NSC and director of security for the Office of Homeland Security). Not only did Rendon put together the CIC, but, following Sept. 11, 2001, he won a $100,000 per month Pentagon contract to work for the short-lived Office of Strategic Influence. This was a black-propaganda unit inside the Feith's "chicken-hawk intelligence agency" led by William Luti, a retired Navy captain who was seconded to the Pentagon from the Office of Vice President Dick Cheney. When the New York Times exposed the planned OSI agitprop unit, the plans were scrapped, but Rendon retained the Pentagon cash-flow. ------------------- Wall St. Dirty Tricks Hit LaRouche Campaign ... Mellon Scaife has also financed Daniel Pipes' Foreign Policy Research Institute (FIPRI) in Philadelphia, a US support center for Ariel Sharon's crimes. ... www.larouchepub.com/pr/2002/020223aff_v_lar.html - 6k - Cached - Similar pages Iraq Inspections Have Exposed the Hoax of the 'Dossiers' ... Peruvian, now living in the United States, who also works for the notorious anti-Islam journal Middle East Quarterly, published by Daniel Pipes' Foreign Policy ... www.larouchepub.com/other/2003/3003iraq_inspex.html - 10k - Cached - Similar pages The Tale of the Hippopotamus, by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. ... Conspiracy: How the Paranoid Style Flourishes and Where it Comes From by Daniel Pipes New York: Simon & Schuster (Free Press), 1997, 258 pages, hardbound, $25. ... www.larouchepub.com/lar/1998/lhl_hippo_tale.html - 36k - Cached - Similar pages Behind the Iraq Dossier Hoax: Intelligence Was Cooked in Israel ... in America. His writings frequently appear in Middle East Quarterly, the hyper-shrill propaganda journal of Daniel Pipes. Rubin ... www.larouchepub.com/other/2003/3007neocon_hoax.html - 14k - Cached - Similar pages EIR Number 8, February 20, 1998 ... Books. The tale of the Hippopotamus. Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. reviews Conspiracy: How the Paranoid Style Flourishes and Where it Comes From, by Daniel Pipes. ... www.larouchepub.com/eirtoc/1998/eirtoc_2508.html - 8k - Cached - Similar pages Michael Ledeen Demands 'Regime Change' in Iran ... Brownback was joined in the call to arms in defense of the terrorist MEK, by Michael Ledeen's alter-ego Daniel Pipes, who posted an op-ed on his website ... www.larouchepub.com/other/2003/3027ledeen_iran.html - 26k - Cached - Similar pages Hobeika Assassination: Sharon's Bloody Message ... Among many others are right-wingers Daniel Pipes, Sen. Jesse Helms (RN.C.), and Iran-Contra player and former National Security Adviser Robert McFarlane. ... www.larouchepub.com/other/2002/2905hobeika.html - 11k - Cached - Similar pages Who Are the American Family Foundation Mind-Controllers ... ... Sharonist propagandists Steve Emerson and Daniel Pipes fit the same profile of shared-assets of the right-wing Zionist Lobby, and of the US neo-conservative ... www.larouchepub.com/other/2002/2915aff_docum.html - 34k - Cached - Similar pages The Sordid Sponsors of Perle's 'French Expert' ... By 2000, Daniel Pipes, a leading advocate of expanding war throughout the Middle East, was adding copy from Murawiec to his Middle East Quarterly journal. ... www.larouchepub.com/other/2002/2931murawiec_doss.html - 23k - Cached - Similar pages World and Nation-State ... Norquist reports that President Bush and top adviser Karl Rove are angry with Gaffney, Daniel Pipes, and Steven Emerson, for painting all American Muslims with ... www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2003/ 2003_1-9/2003-6a/usnews.html - 30k - Cached - Similar pages 25-Year 'Shotgun Marriage' of Israel's Likud and US ... ... under then-Defense Minister Sharon, a career Israeli Army Intelligence officer, and an intimate collaborator of Steve Emerson, Daniel Pipes, Meyrav Wurmser ... www.larouchepub.com/other/2002/2946likud_fundies.html - 30k - Cached - Similar pages ----- Original Message ----- From: "nagy" <email@example.com> To: "CASI discussion list" <firstname.lastname@example.org>; "Voices UK" <email@example.com> Cc: "nagy" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sent: Sonntag, 20. Juli 2003 18:45 Subject: [casi] sent to BBC 's "Have your say" re Dr. Kelly Dear Colleagues, Perhaps I may be permitted to sumbit this to CASI without attack, to CASI. I'm certainly no one compared to Dr. Kelly, but I think I also have not had a forum to defend myself, based on my stand re Iraq, water, and children. My quarrel is with Sen. Gregg (chair of the committee which is holding an "excecutive" hearing on the elevation of Dr. Pipes, my accusser in the NY Post to the U.U. Institute of Peace. Here is my statement to "Have Your Say" -- probably not to be published by BBC, but anything is possible. =============================================================== As someone whose 20 year career in academia may have been ended, at least in the U.S., due largely to an article in the NY Post and the refusal of Congress to permit a public hearing regarding my accusser who is has been nominated for a position requiring the Advice and Consent of the U.S. Senate, I can certainly empathize with Dr. Kelly's structural inability to defend himself. What can you, and you may be next, do when you are accussed but have no ability to respond in any apt forum? Thomas J. Nagy, Ph.D. George Washington U. Washington, D.C. p.s. A colleague's questioning my very sanity on my own university's listserv directed to my colleagues which I was not permitted to see until much later has certainly not helped. Finally, I am not at all sucidal, so if I'm found, I can only hope that the autopsy is done in a neutral country. But I don't think I have the importance to be the object of weapons other than words, which are quite enough to destroy me. ================================================================ My statement was sent in response to: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/talking_point/3077395.stm Tom Thomas J. Nagy, Ph.D. Assoc. Prof. of Expert Systems George Washington Univeristy Sch. of Business & Public Mgt. Washington, D.C. 20052 home.gwu.edu/~nagy _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email email@example.com All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email firstname.lastname@example.org All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email email@example.com All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk