The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
>ee to leave it whenever you want.Obviously, it is far >more free than "unoccupied Iraq". It is commendable to be >so concerned about Of course the US had much to do with Saddam haiving so much power to begin with -- the US has substantially occupied Iraq by proxy for decades. That aside, the comparison of bad with worse does not speak of what should be, nor negate the insistence on doing away with both bad and worse in favor of what is good. Shall we excuse one who drives off a lion from eating someone and then proceeds to set his dog on the victim, saying that the dog is better than the lion? ________________________________________________________________ The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today! _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email firstname.lastname@example.org All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk