The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
[ Presenting plain-text part of multi-format email ] As we read, almost daily, of more information that seems to show the ridiculousness of the USuk claims, it seems that the jury should have been in long ago. The claims rested on; Iraq has weapons, Iraq will use the weapons, Iraq will share the weapons... We have found no weapons, but george the lesser simply says "more time is needed" which sounds vaguely familiar to blix and company. Iraq used no weapons although they were allegedly moved "to the front lines" and the military had been given orders "to use them" and yet... And as to the sharing, of course the constant surveliance did not prove this to be true either... So, hasn't the USuk line been weighed and found wanting? What is the press waiting for? How about some of you large cranium types writing this up in a useable format and poking the press in the collective buttocks and lets sit Shrub and Poodle-boy down. Roger Stroope Austin College Sherman Texas, USA www.austincollege.edu _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk