The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[casi] WSWS News: US raid on Palestinian embassy in Baghdad: an act of political gangsterism



http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/jun2003/emb-j05.shtml

WSWS : News & Analysis : Middle East : Iraq

US raid on Palestinian embassy in Baghdad: an act of
political gangsterism
By Jean Shaoul
5 June 2003

US troops raided and ransacked the Palestinian embassy in
Baghdad at the end of May. They arrested 11 members of its
staff, including its top diplomat, and nothing has been
heard of the Palestinians since then. The raid is an act of
political gangsterism carried out by US armed forces that
have occupied Iraq on the basis of an illegal war. It was
instigated at the direct request of Israel¡¦s finance
secretary and former Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu.

An AP report cites Mohammad Abdul Wahab, a member of staff
at the embassy, as saying, ¡§They even took all our water
bottles and food cans. They behaved like common thieves.¡¨

According to Wahab, on May 28 dozens of US troops escorted
by several armoured vehicles entered the embassy. After the
guards opened the gate, they were immediately arrested and
handcuffed by the soldiers who burst into the building and
held up officials, drivers and gardeners, including Charge d
¡¦Affaires Najah Abdul Rahman who was running the legation
in the ambassador¡¦s absence. Wahab said that they were
taken to a US base in the centre of the city and are still
in custody.

The soldiers kicked and smashed their way in¡Xmany of the
doors in the building had the marks of combat boots¡Xand
used shotguns to blast open office doors, although they were
all either unlocked or had keys in them. Filing cabinets
were ransacked and their contents removed. Troops broke off
the hinges of an embassy safe and cleaned it out. They
smashed an official photo of Yasser Arafat, the Palestinian
president, and threw it on the ground.

Wahab said that the soldiers had taken away two embassy
flags and seized three AK-47 automatic rifles and a hand gun
that the sentries had used to guard the building during the
looting that destroyed much of the city after the US seized
Baghdad.

¡§To attack a foreign embassy is a criminal act and a breach
of diplomatic immunity,¡¨ Wahab said.

The US troops had told the embassy staff that the mission
did not have ¡§authorisation¡¨ to possess automatic weapons,
claiming this as proof of the embassy staff¡¦s involvement
in terrorism. But Wahab explained that they had had a
licence from the Saddam Hussein government. ¡§Every embassy
has guns. We used them to ward off looters,¡¨ he said.

Many foreign organisations and rich Iraqis have hired armed
guards since the collapse of law and order after the US
overthrew the Hussein regime.

Following the raid, the troops sealed off the embassy,
putting up barbed wire around the building and locking the
main gate.

The next day, US General David McKiernan, commander of US
ground forces in Iraq, confirmed the raid but claimed that
only eight people were detained¡Xseven Palestinians and one
Syrian. McKiernan said that he did not know how many of them
had diplomatic status. ¡§This happened in a part of Baghdad
where we lost a soldier,¡¨ he said. He clearly meant to
imply that the Palestinians were responsible and that the
embassy was being used as a weapons store for terrorists.

The following day, US State Department spokesman Richard
Boucher announced that all diplomats accredited under the
Saddam Hussein regime could no longer expect diplomatic
immunity or any of the rights accorded under accreditation
to Saddam Hussein¡¦s government. The US was ¡§discouraging¡¨
foreign diplomats from entering Iraq until a new government
was in place as ¡§at this point there is really no purpose¡¨
for them to be there. Even those who were there with the
approval of the US forces did not have diplomatic immunity,
he added.

The raid follows the deliberate bombing of the embassy on
April 7. The attack from an air-to-ground missile launched
by US military aircraft in broad daylight severely damaged
the building and its contents. The embassy is located in
Baghdad¡¦s diplomatic quarter.

A Palestinian Authority spokesman at the time said, ¡§No
other embassies were targeted for bombing, which proves that
the targeting of the Palestinian embassy was premeditated
and not an accident.¡¨ He denounced it as a flagrant
violation of all diplomatic norms and laws, which give
foreign embassies immunity and safety and considers them
outside the theatre of military operations.

The attack followed the bombing the previous day of a
civilian neighbourhood of Palestinian refugees, who have
been in Iraq since the establishment of the Zionist state in
1948.

The US has ripped up every international convention of
wartime conduct. It is now open season. Anything goes.
During its illegal war on Iraq, Washington has shot and
killed journalists covering the war and bombed the
Al-Jazeera TV station in Baghdad. It also bombed the Chinese
embassy in Belgrade during the NATO-led war on Serbia in
1999, to name but a few of its most egregious acts.

The recent attacks on the Palestinian embassy are important
for what they reveal. Firstly, this is an undisguised
attempt to link the Palestinians to Iraq and terrorism in an
effort to intimidate the Palestinian Authority at Israel¡¦s
behest.

There is every indication that this attack was mounted at
Israel¡¦s insistence. An article on Israel¡¦s finance
minister Binyamin Netanyahu¡¦s website by Joseph Farah
states: ¡§As I report in the latest edition of G2 Bulletin,
there is plenty of substantial evidence to suggest the
Palestinian embassy in Iraq knows plenty about where Iraq¡¦s
weapons of mass destruction were hidden.

¡§Sources said the site¡¦s diplomatic immunity kept the
documents beyond the reach of UN arms inspectors for years
and may still present a hurdle for US-led forces. The
documents relate to the purchase of raw materials required
for Iraq¡¦s manufacture and deployment of weapons of mass
destruction. The PA embassy is situated in Yasser Arafat¡¦s
private residence in Baghdad, a heavily guarded palatial
structure well inside a compound.

¡§One of the Iraqi opposition groups¡¦ American
sympathisers, who worked with them in London from 1991 to
1994 and resumed activity on their behalf in Washington,
said that the hidden documents refer to Iraq¡¦s chemical
weapons, VX nerve gas, ¡§and possibly nuclear arms.¡¨

Netanyahu is the political favourite of the far-right,
Christian fundamentalist and extreme Zionist elements that
exercise such political sway within the Bush administration.
With this raid and arrests, the Bush administration is
sending out a message writ large. It intends to impose its
¡§road map¡¨ and the Palestinian Authority (PA) had better
fall in line with the demands of the Zionist state, or face
being linked directly to the so-called war against terrorism
in line with the repeated demands of the Likud government.
To avoid this fate, the PA must police and pin down their
own people in fenced off reservations¡Xcynically termed an
¡§independent¡¨ state¡Xin the interests of US imperialism
and its local sheriff in the region, Ariel Sharon, in
Israel.

More generally, this action is aimed at intimidating
everyone and anyone who steps out of line. Libya certainly
got the message. Two days after Boucher¡¦s announcement,
Libya announced that it was breaking off diplomatic
relations with Iraq and closing its embassy in Baghdad.
¡§Libya has decided to cut diplomatic relations with Iraq,
to close its embassy in Baghdad and recall all its
personnel,¡¨ the Foreign Ministry said.

It added that the decision was taken as a result of ¡§the
practices of the American and British occupation forces
against diplomatic missions in Baghdad and the announcement
that their diplomatic immunity had lapsed¡¨. It stressed
that the US-led occupation was responsible for the safe
return of the Libyan diplomats and the protection of their
embassy.

One of the most significant features of the raid is the lack
of opposition to them from right across the official
political spectrum. One has to ask: where is the outrage at
such acts of US barbarism and lawlessness? Just what does
the Bush administration have to do before suffering some
form of censure?

The United Nations and the European Union that have
bankrolled the Palestinian Authority have kept silent,
fearful of upsetting Washington and provoking a chain of
social unrest that will threaten their own imperialist
interests in the region. The craven Arab regimes have not
uttered a word of condemnation. The Libyans pulled out of
Baghdad without so much as criticising the US.

Nor have there been any angry outcries from the world¡¦s
press. Large sections of the nominally liberal press failed
even to report the affair or dropped it like a hot potato
after an initial cursory article.

Such silence paves the way for similar bullying,
intimidation and the tearing up of social norms and basic
democratic rights all over the world including in the US and
in the European metropolitan centres.

Copyright 1998-2003
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved


_______________________________________________
Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss
To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk
All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk


[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]