The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[casi] The Silent Genocide from America



http://www.rense.com/general37/InvisibleGenocid.html

The Silent Genocide from America

Mohammed Daud Miraki, MA, MA, PhD

Director Afghan DU & Recovery Fund

Mdmiraki@ameritech.net

When Bush jr. said, "we will smoke them out…" he lived up to his promise,
making life an unattainable reality for the unborn and unsustainable reality
for the living sentencing the Afghan people and their future generations to
a predetermined death sentence.

"After the Americans destroyed our village and killed many of us, we also
lost our houses and have nothing to eat. However, we would have endured
these miseries and even accepted them, if the Americans had not sentenced us
all to death. When I saw my deformed grandson, I realized that my hopes of
the future have vanished for good, different from the hopelessness of the
Russian barbarism, even though at that time I lost my older son Shafiqullah.
This time, however, I know we are part of the invisible genocide brought on
us by America, a silence death from which I know we will not escape." (Jooma
Khan of Laghman province, March 2003)

These words were uttered by an aggrieved Afghan grandfather, who saw his own
and that of others' familial extinction at the hands of the United States of
America and her allies. Another Afghan, who also saw his demise, said:

"I realized this slow, yet certain death, when I saw blood in my urine and
developed severe pain in my kidneys along with breathing problems I never
had before. Many of my family members started to complain from confusion and
the pregnant women miscarried their babies while others gave birth to
disabled infants" (Akbar Khan from Paktika province, February 2003)

The perpetuation of the perpetual death in Afghanistan continues with the
passage of each day. Every day, people see the silent death striking their
families and friends, hopeless and terrified at the sight of the next
funeral in their minds' eyes. This indiscriminate murder of the Afghan
people continues while those, whose tax money paid for the monstrous weapons
and brought about this genocide pretend as though all is well. The horrific
pictures of those dying--whose bodies do not correlate to their age since
they have internalized so much uranium dust that it impacted the morphology
of their bodies--remain in the memories of those still living who are
fearfully waiting for their turn of disaster. The pregnant women are afraid
from giving birth to babies--horrified to see a deformity instead of a
healthy child. This is the legacy of the US "liberation", an indiscriminate
murder of the weak and the unarmed that do not have any means of
self-defense. In fact, there is no defensive measure against such Weapons of
Mass Destruction because these deadly particles of uranium oxide--the dust
formed after uranium pulverizes upon impacting a target--remain in soil,
water and cover the surface of vegetation for generations to come.

When a US bomb or that of her allies landed on an Afghan village or town,
the land and its people have become part of the deadly legacy of silent
death. This death sentence is different from any other type because in this
type death sentence all the people, their land and future generations are
condemned to an inescapable genocide. The tragedy that makes this state of
affairs so dreadful is the unavoidably invisible threat that targets
everyone indiscriminately. Moreover, the threat has become endemic to the
fiber of existence, contaminated the land, water and its inhabitants. In
fact, when Bush jr. said, "we will smoke them out…" he lived up to his
promise, making life an unattainable reality for the unborn and
unsustainable reality for the living, hence, sentencing Afghan people and
their future generations to a predetermined death sentence.

The true extent of this disaster is unfolding as time goes by. In light of
the continuous revelations about the quantity and types of weapons used in
Afghanistan, the worse has not fully materialized. Everyday, US AC 130
gunships, A-10s and B 52s bomb Afghan villages and towns at each turn when a
unit of US troops encounter resistance. Consequently, not only, the
perpetual death continues but rather, every round of depleted uranium is one
additional nail in the collective coffin of the Afghan people.

The usage of great number of munitions and armaments dropped by US jets
resulted in upsurge of various health problems weeks into 2002. This pattern
is different from that experienced by the Iraqi after the first Gulf War
where it took years for many of the birth defects, deformities and other
health conditions to surface. This points to the enormity of uranium weapons
used in Afghanistan, a fact, illustrated by many investigators world wide,
notably Dai Williams in England, and Dr. Durakovic from the Uranium Medical
Research Center in Canada, and Dr. Marc Herald in the United States among
others. Furthermore, various international newspapers and media outlets
notably Le Monde Diplomatique, Guardian, Frontier Post, BBC, CBC, Al Jazeera
among others have reported the types of weapon systems used against Afghan
targets--villages, towns--and mountain cave complexes. According to the BBC
(April 10, 2002), more than 6600 J-dam bombs were dropped on Afghanistan. On
October 2002, Boston Globe also reported:

"In contrast with older weapons, the new generation finds its way with
advances such as target-elevation data and satellite signals. The JDAM
already has proven itself in Afghanistan. By February [2002], commanders had
dropped 6,600 JDAMs, consultants estimate - so many that stockpiles ran low
and officials had to scramble up more production from a Missouri factory."

By October 2002, the first anniversary of US invasion of Afghanistan, more
than 10000 tons of bombs landed on Afghan soil. (Socialist Worker Online,
October 11, 2002) Imagine the magnitude of carnage and contamination caused
by such barbarism. While another report by Kate Randall on December 2001,
put the number of US bombed dropped at 12000:

"Since the US launched the war on Afghanistan October 7, more than 12,000 US
bombs have been dropped on the country. According to the Pentagon, about 60
percent of these bombs have been precision-guided by satellite or laser
technology. However, many of these bombs–dropped by B-52s and other aircraft
from tens of thousands of feet in the air–have strayed off course, hitting
civilian targets." (WSWS, December 29, 2001)


In another report, a year after September 11, 2001, Matt Kelley of the
Associated Press put the US munitions statistics as follows:

"U.S. and coalition airplanes have conducted more than 21,000 flights over
Afghanistan, dropping more than 20,000 munitions. About 60 percent of the
ordnance dropped on Afghanistan has been precision guided, the highest
percentage in any conflict."

Similarly the Guardian reported on April 10, 2002:

"More than 22,000 weapons - ranging from cruise missiles to heavy fuel-air
bombs - have been dropped on the country over the past six months…. US
pilots dropped more than 6,600 joint direct attack munitions (J-dams), the
satellite-guided bombs… One in four bombs and missiles dropped by the US on
Afghanistan may have missed its target"

The new generations of hard target weapons whose warheads are made of dense
metal have contributed to the heavy contamination of land, water and general
population.



The following munitions have been deployed in bombing the poorest country of
the world, Afghanistan:



Smart Bombs
 Guided Missiles
 Sub-munitions

GBU-15 Y
 AGM-86D CALCM Y
 BLU-97B cluster bomb Y

GBU-24 Y
 AGM-130C Y

GBU-27 Y
 AGM-142 Hav Nap Y

GBU-28 B/B Y
 AGM-154C JSOW 154

P

GBU-31 JDAM Y
 AGM-158 JASSM P

GBU-32 JDAM Y
 BGM-109 Tactical Tomahawk P

GBU-37 B/B Y
 Storm Shadow / SCALP P

SSB P




Y = reported use P = prototype testing expected

The patent information of many of these munitions point to the usage of
dense metal--depleted uranium, non-depleted uranium, or Tungsten, the latter
is not likely since it costs more and is difficult to manufacture. Tungsten
is more expensive than depleted uranium, which is in abundance. The world
uranium industry has over one million tons of depleted uranium to dispose
of. Tungsten is also difficult to manufacture because is 1.75 times harder
than uranium and tungsten has a much higher melting point, (U = 1132
Celsius, W = 3422 Celsius). Moreover, depleted uranium is also effective as
incendiary device since it burns fiercely in air. As incendiary weapon, it
could ignite munitions inside tanks and burn underground weapon and fuel
storage facilities and would serve effective in destroying chemical and
biological agents in underground facilities. The suitability of uranium
whether depleted or non-depleted is further reinforced by the claims of the
Uranium Medical Research Center (UMRC):

"By the DOD’s own admission, the best performing metal that consistently
fits these functional military profiles is uranium and alloys of uranium.
Titanium and tungsten are not suitable as the prime alloy base for these
purposes. Uranium (whether NDU or DU) offers unique structural features and
the chemistry best suited for the defeat of deep, bunkerized targets,
multiple types of targets in area denial munitions, and penetrating
composite ceramic and metal armoured [sic] targets."

"Uranium can be engineered to be "self-sharpening" so that when it hits a
target, it retains its punching point as material erodes off the warhead
(titanium and tungsten will not do this). Uranium’s molecular structure can
re-formed, using metallurgical and "nano-technologies" to deliver a selected
range of ballistic features, including kinetic, thermal, pyrophoric, liquid
metal and high-pressure/high-heat, plasma effects. Uranium is a readily
available metal, cheap to produce and is in abundance in DOE’s, DOD’s and
their weapon’s contractors’ stockpiles."

Based on these favorable military characteristics including low cost, it is
logical to use uranium than tungsten. With this mind, the following patent
information would further shed light on the composition of these DU based
munitions: These extracts are from the works of renowned independent DU
researcher Dai Williams http://www.eoslifework.co.uk

"Patent 6389977 (Shrouded Aerial Bomb) clearly identifies Depleted Uranium
as an intended design option for the hard target guided bombs most widely
used in Afghanistan - upgraded versions of the 2,000 lb. BLU-109/B hard
target warhead with the AUP-116 advanced penetrator. These include versions
of the GBU-15, 24 and 31 and the AGM-130C."

In light of the advantages of uranium over tungsten, exploring the following
US patent table should further put to rest any doubts about the deadly
composition of those weapons that turned Afghanistan uninhabitable
wasteland.

The extracts in the following table are presented by Dai Williams and could
be on the following web-site
http://www.eoslifework.co.uk/u23.htm#USpatreport





Table A: US Patents with direct references to Uranium or Depleted Uranium DU

US Patent Number
 Date
 Title and extracts from patent specifications

4,638,737
 June 28, 1985


A missile for defeating active armor1 of a target as set forth in

claim 3, wherein said primary warhead is made of a heavy metal selected from
tungsten carbide and uranium ore…

… these subcaliber warheads are preferably kinetic energy warheads that are
referred to as flechettes and are made of heavy material such as depleted
uranium or tungsten

carbide

5,542,354
 July 20, 1995
 Segmenting warhead projectile

The warhead of claim 2 wherein said first housing and said second housing
are independently each selected from the group consisting of iron, steel,
tungsten, tantalum, depleted uranium and alloys thereof ... Other metals
useful for the frangible first housing include tungsten, tantalum, depleted
uranium and alloys thereof.

5,691,502
 June 5, 1995
 Low velocity radial deployment with

predetermined pattern

The invention can be employed in an interceptor missile for the purpose of
increasing the area of potential impact with a target. Each lethality
enhancing object (28) is preferably fabricated from

a dense metal. While any suitable dense metal can be employed, metals having
a density of at least 15 gm/cc are presently preferred, e.g., tantalum,
tungsten, rhenium, uranium, etc.

The higher densities permit a greater mass in a given volume or the same
mass in a smaller volume, thereby enhancing the impact force of a lethality
enhancing object….

6,389,977


 Dec 11, 1997


 Shrouded Aerial Bomb [BLU-109/B and variants]

This is definitive patent for the outer casing of the upgraded GUB-15,
24,27, 31 and AGM-

130C warheads. The shroud contains the AUP-116 advanced penetrator.

This patent specifically identifies BOTH Tungsten AND Depleted Uranium
penetrator versions

Claims:

1….

…

5. The shrouded aerial bomb as claimed in claim 1, wherein

the penetrating body is formed of depleted uranium.





Since 1997, the US has been modifying and upgrading its munitions enhancing
their penetrability by using dense metal as the following quote further
exposes:

"Since 1997 the United States has been modifying and upgrading its missiles
and guided (smart) bombs. Prototypes of these bombs were tested in the
Kosovo mountains in 1999, but a far greater range has been tested in
Afghanistan. The upgrade involves replacing a conventional warhead by a
heavy, dense metal one. Calculating the volume and the weight of this
mystery metal leads to two possible conclusions: it is either tungsten or
depleted uranium." Le Monde diplomatique March 2002

"The DU explosive charges in the guided bomb systems used in Afghanistan can
weigh as much as one and a half metric tons (as in Raytheon's Bunker
Buster - GBU-28)" Le Monde March 2002

The usage of new generation weapons was also confirmed by the Uranium
Medical Research Center (UMRC):

"Independent research and publicly available documentation of NATO and US
weapons’ development programs hinted at or noted directly that
non-fissionable (non-thermal nuclear) uranium weapons (including DU)
development programs are still underway. Sources include: military research
laboratories and sub-contract research & development programs; the US
Science Based Stockpile Stewardship Program; the Federation of American
Scientists; veterans’ reports; and, the annual reports and advertising of
independent weapons contractors. US military health warnings to OEF
[Operation Enduring Freedom] personnel indicate the presence of radiological
contaminants; recommending troops take protection measures. OEF’s forward
targeting personnel, Special Forces and post-bombing, site inspection teams
have been given radiation protection instructions, radiation detectors and
protective equipment prior to and since entering Afghanistan."

It continues:

"The U.S. DBHT (Deeply Buried Hard Target) Project, aimed at developing
weapons to destroy biological, nuclear and chemical weapons storage and
manufacturing facilities in rogue states; and, the US Strategic Military
Plan and US Nuclear Posture Review expresses intentions to use new classes
of weapons in Afghanistan and other states. This program was known to be
accelerating its weapons development and experiments in readiness for a
possible Iraqi incursion. The White House and US-DOD spoke frequently about
the development and use of fission, low-yield and non-fission, seismic
bunker- and cave-busters. These weapons, by design, require heavy ballast
and narrow diameter casings that can drive deeply into the earth or through
super-reinforced military targets, tough enough to withstand high velocity
impacts before they reach detonation depth."

UMRC articulates the difference of these weapons with those of the first
Gulf War:

"These new generations of weapons and the targets for which they are
designed dictate specific features and functions: They are designed as
"self-forging" and capable of punching through multi-layered,
extra-reinforced, hardened-targets. They must be able to defeat 14 to 20
feet of heavily reinforced concrete. Unlike the Gulf War DU armour [sic]
defeat penetrators, these new warheads would be used in conjunction with
high explosive charges and or high-pressure, shaped charges and
delayed-action detonators."

In addition to the bombs and rockets, the US air force relies heavily on
AC-130 flying gunships which are equipped with the 25 mm GAU-12 Gatling gun
(1,800 rounds per minute) with DU ammunition further adding to the
contamination of the environment and misery of the poor people of
Afghanistan. Furthermore, US ground forces also rely heavily on A-10 'tank
killer' that uses 30 mm rounds of depleted uranium ammunitions. These two
weapon systems contribute on daily basis to the misery of the people there.

This disaster will haunt Afghan children, women and men for generations to
come. Dr. Michael H. Repacholi of the World Health Organization reported:

"DU [deleted uranium] is released from fired weapons in the form of small
particles that may be inhaled, ingested or remain in the environment."

He added further:

"Children rather than adults may be considered to be more at risk of DU
exposure when returning to normal activities within a war zone through
contaminated food and water, since typical hand-to-mouth activity of
inquisitive play could lead to high DU ingestion from contaminated soil."
(The Laissez Faire City Times, Vol 5, No 44, October 29, 2001}

At the defense department briefing, Dr. Ross Anthony, from the Rand
Corporation had said the following about depleted uranium:

"The kidney is the part that is the most susceptible." (The Laissez Faire
City Times, Vol 5, No 44, October 29, 2001}

Steve Fetter and Frank von Hippel wrote in the Bulletin of the Atomic
Scientists (1999)

"Radiation doses for soldiers with embedded fragments of depleted uranium
may be troublesome…The ground the DU-contaminated plumes passed over would
be coated with a thin layer of DU dust, some of which would be later kicked
up by wind and human activity. ...The munitions could deposit a layer of
[depleted uranium] dust on crops that could be eaten directly by humans or
by animals later consumed by humans. …However, rough estimates suggest that
the cancer risk from consumption of contaminated produce would be less than
from inhalation"

What this translates into is more deformities, diseases and deaths for the
poor Afghans. As I also stated in my previous report
http://www.rense.com/general35/perp.htm, it took on average 5 years for
various deformities to emerge in Iraq after the first Gulf War, however, in
Afghanistan, people started to complain from various health problems within
weeks of the initial bombing. This means only one thing, the magnitude of
uranium based weapons used in Afghanistan is much higher than that in Iraq
during the first Gulf War. This fact is reinforced by the news that in the
first few months of the bombing more 6,600 J-dams/smart bombs have been
dropped on Afghanistan, making the size of the uranium contamination much
higher than in Iraq during the first Gulf War.

The emergence of excessive health problems increased curiosity and concerns
among scientists worldwide of the usage of depleted uranium. The first
scientific undertaking was led by the Uranium Medical Research Center (UMRC)
which consisted of two consecutive trips to JalalAbad and Kabul. The
preliminary findings by the UMRC research teams concluded:

"Radiological measurements of the uranium concentrations in Afghan civilians
’ urine samples indicate abnormally high levels of non-depleted uranium.
Radiological measurements of Afghan civilians’ have high concentrations of
uranium in a range beginning at 4 X’s and reaching to over 20 X’s normal
populations. This is 400% to 2000% higher than the study controls and normal
population baselines of the concentrations of nanograms of uranium per liter
of urine in a 24-hour sample."
"The isotopic ratios of the uranium contaminant measured in Afghan civilians
show that it is not Depleted Uranium (DU). The isotopes of uranium found in
the Afghan civilians’ urine is Non-Depleted Uranium."
"UMRC investigated the possible origins of this contamination. The
preliminary results of the radiological urine analysis are corroborated by
radiological measurements of debris and weapons’ fragment samples at OEF
(Operation Enduring Freedom) target sites and bomb-craters."
"UMRC’s Field Team found several hundred civilians with acute symptoms and
reportedly developing, chronic symptoms of uranium internal contamination
(including congenital problems in newborns). All subjects’ on-set of
symptoms are reported to coincide with the calendar dates of the bombing and
were not present prior to the bombing."
"Radiological measurements of any populations’ urine specimens identify, as
a standard practice, the abundance of each of the 3 naturally occurring
isotopes of uranium (U234, 235, 238). These isotopes’ abundances
(quantities) are measured as a fraction of the uranium released in a 24-hour
sample of urine. The isotopic ratios (proportions) of the uranium in the
urine collected in Afghanistan has the unmistakable signature of
Non-Depleted Uranium. It does not express the isotopic ratio of DU. Depleted
Uranium and Non-depleted Uranium are both species of uranium. UMRC is
reporting the isotopic signatures of the uranium found in the Afghan
civilians’ urine." (UMRC Preliminary Findings from Afghanistan & Operation
Enduring Freedom, http://www.umrc.net/AfghanistanOEF.asp)
The staff of UMRC communicated the following about Non-Depleted Uranium:

"Actually, NDU, if it is "virgin uranium", is pure uranium extracted from
the feed stock at the pre-enrichment phase of either the fuel or weapons
development cycles and is significantly less expensive per ton than DU. The
gaseous diffusion and centrifuge processes of enriching uranium require so
much electrical power, they need dedicated power production sources - some
powered reactors have been constructed simply to power up the enrichment
process. They also are expensive technologies to operate and capitalize. DU,
being the by-product of enrichment is by definition, much more expensive per
ton since it had to be processed through the enrichment phase."


After collecting samples of urine, soil from blast sites and surrounding
areas in Kabul and JalaAbad and other areas, UMRC carrying out detailed
scientific analysis of these samples and released their findings on
21.05.2003, http://www.umrc.net/AfghanistanOEF.asp:



UMRC’s recent findings, May 2003, reveal a wider scope of human and
environmental contamination in Afghan civilians, corroborating the November
2002 Jalalabad findings.
Jalalabad area: New reference levels based on recent collections of samples
and controls have revised the Jalalabad results upward to uranium values 45
X’s normal.
New bioassay studies identify uranium internal contamination in Spin Gar
(Tora Bora) area and the City of Kabul are up to 200 X’s the Reference Level
of the unexposed population.
Surface water, rice fields and catch-basins adjacent to and surrounding the
bombsites have high values of uranium, up to 27 X’s normal.
Low but as yet inconclusive readings of U236 have been identified by the
laboratory in some urine samples; further analysis is underway to determine
the metallurgical origins of the uranium with a consideration of "commercial
natural uranium" containing recycled reactor spent fuel products.
Analyses of soils and debris collected inside OEF bomb craters and target
sites have uranium values 3 X’s to 6 X’s normal.
Surface soils surrounding the bombsites and downwind from ground-zero are
elevated close to 3 X’s reference levels.
Field and laboratory data show that samples with elevated uranium levels,
civilian health problems, and weapons exposure histories correspond
spatially and chronologically to ordnance deployed by Operation Enduring
Freedom.
Along the lines of the UMRC findings, I instructed two groups of field
surveyors to comb eastern and southeastern Afghanistan as well as Kabul for
effects on uranium on local populations, they have found many dreadful
conditions.

They targeted wide areas all over Afghanistan, however, the depth of the con
tamination is situated in the Pashtun dominated areas, east, southeast,
south and southwestern Afghanistan. More then thousands tons of non-depleted
uranium along with depleted uranium (mostly from A-10 and AC-130 Gatling
guns) has been used by the US and her allies against the defenseless people
of Afghanistan.

The bulk of the contamination is in ToraBora, Bagram frontline--north of
Kabul, Shaikoot, Paktia, Paktika, Mazar-i-sharif, and Kundoz frontline.
(Field surveyors)

Data Collected by field surveyors:

Subsequent to the contamination, newborn children have physical deformities
and those that do not have physical deformity are suffering from Mental
Retardation. These cases are reported from Paktia, Nanagrhar, Bagram,
Mazar-e-Sharif and Kundoz.

As in my previous report, the survey team reported again that in
bombardments of ToraBora, Shaikoot and Bagram frontline large number of
antiaircraft weapons and rifles had melted.

During the bombardments of ToraBora, Bagram front lines, Kundoz and
Mazar-e-Sharif, many Taliban soldiers were seen with blood coming out from
their mouths, noses and ears. Meanwhile, those Taliban soldiers who returned
to their respective villages started to vomit blood and had bloody stools.
Subsequently, many have died from their conditions.

During bombardment of Kuram village, Surkhrod district of Nangarhar, the
village was completely destroyed and many peoples were killed without any
physical injuries.

After bombardment in Khost public health workers have reported some skin
lesions. Those that developed the skin lesions died after their conditions
were deteriorated.

In Pachir Wa Agam district near to ToraBora targeted area, women started to
suffer from a deadly condition. Several months after the bombing, women of
the area would become angry by petty things and that anger turns into rage,
which subsequently causes the women to collapse and die. (Field Surveyors of
the Afghan DU & Recovery Fund)

My team also reported that many children are born with no limbs, no eyes, or
tumors protruding out from their mouths and their eyes. The following
testimonies and photos--filmed in Iraq are used here to exhibit the
identical conditions of Afghan victims-- exhibit the horrific conditions
from which children in Afghanistan, similar to those in Iraq, suffer from.

The father one of the children in Paktia said this about his child:

"When I saw my little boy with those monstrous red tumors, I thought to
myself, why is it difficult for Americans to understand that they are hated
in our country. If I do this to the child of an American family, that family
has the right to pull my eyes out of my eye sockets. I like to tell the
Americans that they love to live their lives of luxury at the expense of our
extermination" (Assadullah, February 2003)





The father of one of the victims from Kundoz whose wife had given birth to a
deformed child that hardly resembled an infant said this to our survey team
in Kabul:

" My wife was pregnant and we were happily waiting for the moment to see our
second child. On the day of the delivery, my wife felt weird, saying that
she did not feel good and had pain in her abdomen. When the baby was born,
it was hardly a human. It looked as if some one had beaten a baby and then
covered its body with floors. My poor child looked like someone has rolled
it in a basket of floors. When my wife saw the baby, she went into shock and
died after 5 hours." (Zar Ghoon, December, 2002)


The following picture exhibits the condition Zar Ghoon baby was born with:




A man from ToraBora lost controlled of his emotions while chatting with one
of the field volunteers, screamed and posed a question and continued:

"What else do the Americans want? They killed us, they turned our newborns
into horrific deformations, and they turned our farmlands into graveyards
and destroyed our homes. On top of all that their planes fly over and spray
us with bullets. We have nothing to lose; we will fight against them the
same way we fought the previous monster [the former Soviet Union]" (Sa'yed
Gharib, April 2003)

Most of the people that developed various health problems have died; others
suffer from conditions such as kidney disease/failure, confusion, and loss
of immunity and painful joints.

I wish to conclude this paper with the following quote from one of the
victims of the US bombing:

"Tell America, we are not fools. Your words and actions are those of evil.
We do not have airplanes like you do, however, we have one thing that you do
not have principles and morals. We will never do anything remotely similar
to American children what Americans have done to our children and families.
They might win some fights, but we have already won the big fight, the moral
ground." (Nurullah Omar-Khail, March, 2003)








Mohammed Daud Miraki, MA, MA, PhD

Director Afghan DU & Recovery Fund

Mdmiraki@ameritech.net

Bank Account: TCF Bank

5516 N. Clark Street

Chicago, IL 60640

(773) 506-4301

Bank Account Number: 9866355842

Routing Number: 271972572







_______________________________________________
Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss
To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk
All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk


[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]