The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
Oh yeah -- this describes the Iraq situation to a tee. --------- Begin forwarded message ---------- Excerpt from The Daily Kos found at http://www.dailykos.com/MT/mt-comments.cgi?entry_id=2886 "Max, it isn't just the PNAC. The ideology that makes their project possible is "managerial imperialism," like what Chainsaw Al Dunlap, Ken Lay, Jack Welch, and you can name the others, used to do. It's what W learned at B-school. The basic idea is that the imperial CEO can do no wrong. He/she/it packs the board of directors and all the important line offices, thereby co-opting and suppressing all potential rival power centers. He/she/it demands unquestioning obedience of all subordinates and directs the PR departments to turn all corporate publicity into breathless adulation of the fearless leader. Then comes the most important step. The fearless leader strikes hard to change as much as possible at the same time. Leaving no functioning element of the organization untouched, he/she/it orders new procedures, new missions, wholesale reorganizations. It doesn't matter that many aspects of the organization are functioning perfectly well; "if it ain't broke, break it." In other words, organizations have to be shaken apart. The theory says that organizations work better when they've settled down again. But a cynic like me says that disruption is the goal. This approach makes people work so hard picking up the pieces and trying to hold things together that they don't know what the big picture is anymore, and don't have time or energy to compare notes. It also tends to break up established personal and professional arrangements inside an organization, much to the benefit of the imperial CEO. And the most important idea of all is that the imperial CEO must never, ever, ever explain any reasons for what's done, or answer to anyone. See initial steps for the way that's rigged. Along the way, the imperial CEO must loot the organization for what can be gotten. This administration is the imperial CEO in action. They can't be questioned, they can't explain, they work in secret, they have no consistent policy, they've upset every existing institution and relationship they can. (People in Washington have expected politics, and they're still rocked back on their heels-- you can't horsetrade with an imperial CEO, nor can you understand what they do using only political terms.) The PNAC project is not much more than imperial management. It aims to enact at the world level what the administration has done here in the US. That's why it was such an easy sell to W and Rumsfeld and the other corporate types. They recognize CEO glorification when they see it. And that's precisely why other governments really can't tolerate it. Europeans in particular are personally horrified at W's idiocy and lack of couth, and if that's all he was he'd be nothing but a figure of fun. But they really can't stand that he's also a lout, a soccer hooligan-- that's what an imperial CEO looks like from their point of view. They think he's really dangerous. It remains to be seen what they'll do to stop him. They do have lots of weapons. Posted by Altoid at June 1, 2003 04:26 PM" >>> Download free spam killer at http://eliminatespam.com --------- End forwarded message ---------- ________________________________________________________________ The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today! _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk