The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
Elga, thank you. Suzy -----Original Message----- From: casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk [mailto:casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk] On Behalf Of H Sutter Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 7:13 PM To: casi-discuss@lists.casi.org.uk Subject: [casi] A word from Camus... Dear List, Camus wrote an essay "Neither Victim nor Executioner". It was published in Combat, the newspaper of the French Resistance, in 1946. The essay opens with "Yes, we must raise our voices." But Camus did more than raise his voice. He fought in the Resistance during WWII and yet he was averse to killing. He believed that it is "fear and silence" that must be fought. Camus' words are as valid today as they were then - perhaps more so. The complacent - and hypocritical reaction - of the so-called international community to the 'lifting of the sanctions' has reminded me of Camus' call for courage. And I believe too that "Yes, we must raise our voices." Here is an example: "Fischer and Powell welcome the UN Resolution", proclaimed a news item in the German press on May 22. This was the one that legitimized USUK as the occupying powers in Iraq. And to open the doors for USUK's looting of Iraq, this resolution also got rid of the sanctions. Well, there will be some nice crumbs for the coalition of the unwilling too. So here's to selling the people of Iraq down the Western exploitation river! And sweeping under the carpet the fact that the sanctions that devastated Iraqis had not even the benefit of the pretext belaboured for 13 years - those WMDs. For 13 years Iraqis have been collectively punished for a pretext. Mr. Fischer avoided the phrase "lifting the sanctions", he spoke instead of the "decision by the UN Security Council". This "decision", he said, was a good basis for improving the living conditions of the Iraqi people and to stabilize the political situation. Mr. Powell was euphoric: This was a wonderful day for the Iraqi people, he quipped. Differences of opinion have now to be put aside. This was a hint for France - Germany has already eaten crow. Now Iraqi exports are free again, continued the news item. ("Oil wells have been liberated for democracy", as the Onion satirically put it.) And the EU, as a whole, also welcomed the "lifting of the Iraqi sanctions" by the Security Council. They spoke of a "new spirit of cooperation". Immoral, corrupt, and hypocritical politicians - the whole bunch. But the disheartening part is that the whole world acquiesces - and pretends to see the emperor's fig leaves. Camus' concluding words: "But I have always held that, if he who bases his hopes on human nature is a fool, he who gives up in the face of circumstances is a coward. And henceforth, the only honorable course will be to stake everything on a formidable gamble: that words are more powerful than munitions." I understand that it is very, very hard for most people to 'raise their voices' in the face of injustice. In doing so, they set themselves apart from the mainstream society - and people need to feel accepted. Still, the injustice we are facing is horrendous and will eventually catch up with us all. So let's not be cowards, --Elga <Fwd> NEITHER VICTIMS NOR EXECUTIONERS by Albert Camus Yes, we must raise our voices. Up to this point, I have refrained from appealing to emotion. We are being torn apart by a logic of history which we have elaborated in every detail--a net which threatens to strangle us. It is not emotion which can cut through the web of a logic which has gone to irrational lengths, but only reason which can meet logic on its own ground. But I should not want to leave the impression... that any program for the future can get along without our powers of love and indignation. I am well aware that it takes a powerful prime mover to get men into motion and that it is hard to throw one's self into a struggle whose objectives are so modest and where hope has only a rational basis--and hardly even that. But the problem is not how to carry men away; it is essential, on the contrary, that they not be carried away but rather that they be made to understand clearly what they are doing. To save what can be saved so as to open up some kind of future--that is the prime mover, the passion and the sacrifice that is required. It demands only that we reflect and then decide, clearly, whether humanity's lot must be made still more miserable in order to achieve far-off and shadowy ends, whether we should accept a world bristling with arms where brother kills brother; or whether, on the contrary, we should avoid bloodshed and misery as much as possible so that we give a chance for survival to later generations better equipped than we are. For my part, I am fairly sure that I have made the choice. And, having chosen, I think that I must speak out, that I must state that I will never again be one of those, whoever they be, who compromise with murder, and that I must take the consequences of such a decision. The thing is done, and that is as far as I can go at present.... However, I want to make clear the spirit in which this article is written. We are asked to love or to hate such and such a country and such and such a people. But some of us feel too strongly our common humanity to make such a choice. Those who really love the Russian people, in gratitude for what they have never ceased to be--that world leaven which Tolstoy and Gorky speak of--do not wish for them success in power politics, but rather want to spare them, after the ordeals of the past, a new and even more terrible bloodletting. So, too, with the American people, and with the peoples of unhappy Europe. This is the kind of elementary truth we are likely to forget amidst the furious passions of our time. Yes, it is fear and silence and the spiritual isolation they cause that must be fought today. And it is sociability and the universal intercommunication of men that must be defended. Slavery, injustice, and lies destroy this intercourse and forbid this sociability; and so we must reject them. But these evils are today the very stuff of history, so that many consider them necessary evils. It is true that we cannot "escape history," since we are in it up to our necks. But one may propose to fight within history to preserve from history that part of man which is not its proper province. That is all I have to say here. The "point" of this article may be summed up as follows: Modern nations are driven by powerful forces along the roads of power and domination. I will not say that these forces should be furthered or that they should be obstructed. They hardly need our help and, for the moment, they laugh at attempts to hinder them. They will, then, continue. But I will ask only this simple question: What if these forces wind up in a dead end, what if that logic of history on which so many now rely turns out to be a will o' the wisp? What if, despite two or three world wars, despite the sacrifice of several generations and a whole system of values, our grandchildren--supposing they survive-- find themselves no closer to a world society? It may well be that the survivors of such an experience will be too weak to understand their own sufferings. Since these forces are working themselves out and since it is inevitable that they continue to do so,there is no reason why some of us should not take on the job of keeping alive, through the apocalyptic historical vista that stretches before us, a modest thoughtfulness which, without pretending to solve everything, will constantly be prepared to give some human meaning to everyday life. The essential thing is that people should carefully weight the price they must pay.... All I ask is that, in the midst of a murderous world, we agree to reflect on murder and to make a choice. After that, we can distinguish those who accept the consequences of being murderers themselves or the accomplices of murderers, and those who refuse to do so with all their force and being. Since this terrible dividing line does actually exist, it will be a gain if it be clearly marked. Over the expanse of five continents throughout the coming years an endless struggle is going to be pursued between violence and friendly persuasion, a struggle in which, granted, the former has a thousand times the chances of success than that of the latter. But I have always held that, if he who bases his hopes on human nature is a fool, he who gives up in the face of circumstances is a coward. And henceforth, the only honorable course will be to stake everything on a formidable gamble: that words are more powerful than munitions. <End> _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk