The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
Hidden, no paperwork, undeclared, inspectors barred - sound familiar? Where are the A10's, the Bradleys, the JDAMS, the Cruise missiles? By the way now Rumsfeld has said there are unlikely to be wmd's in Iraq and that was the reason for war (we are told) even that tenuos reason is further illegitimate. So what is the legal status of the US/UK Squatters? WMD's and all else reminds me of a childhood rhyme, mabe I'll send it to Rumsfeld. 'When I was going up the stair, I met a man who wasn't there, He wasn't there again today - I wish that he would go away.' Published on Wednesday, May 28, 2003 by the Guardian/UK US Finds Evidence of WMD At Last - Buried in a Field Near Maryland by Julian Borger in Washington The good news for the Pentagon yesterday was that its investigators had finally unearthed evidence of weapons of mass destruction, including 100 vials of anthrax and other dangerous bacteria. The bad news was that the stash was found, not in Iraq, but fewer than 50 miles from Washington, near Fort Detrick in the Maryland countryside. Crews looking for industrial waste at Fort Detrick in Frederick, Maryland have found more than 2,000 tons of hazardous waste and live bacteria. The contaminated soil is being stored in red containers. Crews expected to find industrial waste, but they did not realize how much dangerous material they would find. Crews found 40 drums of chemicals and 113 vials, some with samples of live bacteria like E. coli. Investigators also found a non-disease-forming strain of anthrax. (Photo/nbc4.com) The anthrax was a non-virulent strain, and the discoveries are apparently remnants of an abandoned germ warfare program. They merited only a local news item in the Washington Post. But suspicious finds in Iraq have made front-page news (before later being cleared), given the failure of US military inspection teams to find evidence of the weapons that were the justification for the March invasion. Even more embarrassing for the Pentagon, there was no documentation about the various biological agents disposed of at the US bio-defense center at Fort Detrick. Iraq's failure to come up with paperwork proving the destruction of its biological arsenal was portrayed by the US as evidence of deception in the run-up to the war. In an effort to explain why no chemical or biological weapons had been found in Iraq, the US defense secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, said yesterday the regime may have destroyed them before the war. Speaking to the New York-based Council on Foreign Relations thinktank, he said the speed of U.S. advance may have caught Iraq by surprise, but added: "It is also possible that they decided that they would destroy them prior to a conflict." The US germ warfare program. at Fort Detrick was officially wound up in 1969, but the base has maintained a stock of nasty bugs to help maintain America's defenses against biological attack. The leading theory about the unsolved anthrax letter attacks in 2001 is that they were carried out by a disgruntled former Fort Detrick employee; equipment found dumped in a pond eight miles from the base has been linked to the crimes. The Fort Detrick clean-up has unearthed over 2,000 tonnes of hazardous waste. The sanitation crews were shocked to find vials containing live bacteria. As well as the vaccine form of anthrax, the discarded biological agents included Brucella melitensis, which causes the virulent flu-like disease brucellosis, and klebsiella, a cause of pneumonia. © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2003 ### _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk