The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[casi] Wolfowitz to Turkish military : Over-rule government

Wolfowitz in Ankara:
US urges military to overrule Turkish government

If any additional proof were needed to demonstrate that the aim of the US in
the Middle East is the subjugation of the region rather then the
introduction of “freedom” and “democracy,” then it was provided by the visit
to Turkey two weeks ago by US Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz.

In an interview with the CNN channel Türk he lectured the Turkish government
for bowing to public pressure (more than 90 percent of the population
opposed the Iraq war) and refusing to allow the stationing of US troops on
Turkish territory for the invasion of Iraq. Wolfowitz effectively demanded
an apology, saying: “Lets have a Turkey that steps up and says we made a
mistake. We should have known how bad things were in Iraq but we know now.
Let’s figure out how we can be as helpful as possible to the Americans.”

Even more revealing was his criticism of the Turkish military, which he
accused of holding back from forcing the elected government into line: “I
think for whatever reason they did not play the strong leadership role on
that issue that we would have expected.”

When politely reminded that the military (which has overthrown four elected
governments in the last 45 years in Turkey) is usually criticized for
interfering too much into politics, Wolfowitz responded: “I think it’s
perfectly appropriate, especially in your system, for the military to say it
was in Turkey’s interest to support the United States in that effort.(...)
My impression is they didn’t say it with the kind of strength that would
have made a difference.”

So far no representative of the U. S. government has made such a blunt
public demand that Turkish generals force the will of the United States upon
an elected civilian government. Rather than express outrage over what could
be interpreted as encouragement for a military coup, theTurkish media and
politicians have reacted with a mixture of self-pity and gestures of
obedience to Washington. At every opportunity, they stress that Turkey did
not oppose the war and claim that the country was the most important US ally
after Britain.

Initially, the Turkish parliament barred the use of any use of the country’s
territory for US forces preparing to attack Iraq. Bowing to massive American
pressure, however, it allowed the use of Turkish airspace for bombers and
transport planes. In addition, the government allowed the use of Turkey
territory for logistical support.

Nevertheless, Turkey’ standing with the Bush administration has been
severely downgraded. Ankara was especially hard hit by the US refusal to
allow the Turkish military occupation of northern Iraq. Whether Turkish
firms get some crumbs in the form of being able to participate in the
reconstruction of Iraq is also still very much in doubt.

In particular the Turkish military fears that, despite all US assurances, a
basically autonomous Kurdish state could be set up in Northern Iraq—even if
formally part of an Iraqi federation. Kirkuk, which would likely be the
capital of such a state, is under the control of Kurdish nationalists who
are systematically driving out Turkmen and Arab minorities.

While the Turkish military repeatedly threatened to send troops into
Northern Iraq in the event of such a development, up to now it has bowed to
American demands and refrained from doing so. This is the policy of at least
the chief of the general staff, Hilmi Özkök, reflecting the fact that the
Turkish military is heavily dependent on the supply of military equipment
and financial and political support from the US.

Following the recent replacement of the US proconsul in Iraq, Jay Garner, by
antiterrorism expert Paul Bremer, the far-right newspaper Tercüman even
speculated that Turkey will be needed again when the US pushes ahead with
its subordination of the region. The paper hopes that in the process the
remains of the Kurdish nationalist PKK (Kurdish Workers Party) will also be
wiped out.

“Bush’s choice of a retired antiterrorism expert rather than an ex-military
man gives us clues to the answer to this question: The US’s top priority in
Iraq is not the country’s reconstruction but rather gaining an extensive
foothold in the region, under the guise of the war against terrorism, so as
to be able to besiege all the countries of the Middle East. According to
Bremer, to prevent new terrorist attacks against the US, countries such as
Libya and Iran must be strictly controlled and kept under constant pressure.
...The appointment of Bremer to a position over Garner is a positive
development for Turkey, since Bremer supports keeping a stranglehold on the
terrorist group PKK/KADEK.“ (Tercüman, May 8th)

Arising out of its decades-long role of suppressing the Turkish left and
workers’ movements and crushing Kurdish uprisings, a fascistic faction has
been fostered in the Turkish army, although it remains unclear whether this
faction is in opposition to the military high command or protected by it. At
the end of April, American newspapers wrote that US soldiers had intercepted
a convoy with Turkish special forces in northern Iraq, which was set to arm
the pro-Turkish “Iraqi Turkmen Front.”

Especially noteworthy about this episode was the speed with which it
disappeared from the media and the low-key reaction of the U.S. government.
Faced with similar accusations, neighboring Iran has been targeted with
massive threats and intimidation by Washington. But while the accusations
against Iran have not been backed up by any evidence, with only vague
assertions of “intelligence” regarding “infiltration of Iranian agents,”
Turkey has been, according to the U.S., caught in the act of a far more
serious case of meddling in Iraqi affairs.

In his interview, Wolfowitz said merely: “What happened shouldn’t have
happened.” This would be “a good example I think, that whatever Turkey does
in the north, and we understand Turkey has important interest in the north,
it’s got to be coordinated now through the coalition, through General

He warned Turkey against sending its own troops into Iraq. Turkish soldiers
stationed there for years are now being called upon to leave as well. In
exchange, the US has indicated it will move against the PKK. “The PKK is a
terrorist organization,” he said. “I don’t think we can tolerate a terrorist
organization in northern Iraq.”

Up to now, however, the US has not made clear how and when it intends to
suppress the PKK/KADEK. Last week Turkish officials met with representatives
of Kurdish and Turkmen groups as well as with American intelligence and
military officials in Iraq.

For its part, the PKK/KADEK has taken pains to express its obedience to the
US. At the end of April, it published a statement that favorably compared
president George Bush to his predecessor Clinton. The statement said that
Bill Clinton had preserved the “status quo” by supporting the Turkish state
against the Kurds and “allow[ing] the Saddam regime to survive.” It was now
the task of the US to bring democracy to the whole Middle East: “The
intervention will be successful only if it paves the way for improving
common human values. Any regime similar to the old one will only cause
chaos. Therefore the only way for US is to create the possibility for
setting up democratic regimes and then supporting them.“ (Kurdish Observer,
April 25 2003)


Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit
To contact the list manager, email
All postings are archived on CASI's website:

[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]