The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[casi] AP: Halliburton Contract Goes Beyond Fires



Halliburton Contract Goes Beyond Fires
Tue May 6, 8:16 PM ET

By LARRY MARGASAK, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - An emergency contract the Bush administration gave to
Halliburton Co. to extinguish Iraqi oil fires also gave the firm a more
lucrative role in getting the country's oil system up and running, documents
showed Tuesday.

A congressional critic of the Houston company, formerly run by Vice
President Dick Cheney (news - web sites), said the administration was hiding
the expanded role.


A spokeswoman for Halliburton said the company's initial announcement of the
contract on March 24 disclosed the larger role for its KBR subsidiary.


The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, in a letter to Rep. Henry Waxman last
Friday, disclosed that the no-bid contract included not only extinguishing
fires but "operation of facilities and distribution of products."


Waxman, D-Calif., senior Democrat on the House Government Reform Committee
(news - web sites), wrote Lt. Gen. Robert Flowers of the Corps on Tuesday,
saying the contract "is considerably broader in scope than previously
known."


The lawmaker also said the Corps' proposal to replace the Halliburton
contract with another long-term deal was at odds with administration
statements that Iraq (news - web sites)'s oil belongs to the Iraqi people.


KBR was given the right to extinguish the oil fires under an existing,
contingency contract. Cheney's office has said repeatedly the vice president
had no role in the contract award.


Carol Sanders, a spokeswoman for the Corps of Engineers, said officials were
reviewing the letter but had no immediate response.


Halliburton spokeswoman Wendy Hall pointed to the company's announcement of
the contract in March, which she said revealed the extent of the work.


The release said: "KBR's initial task involves hazard and operational
assessment, extinguishing oil well fires, capping oil well blowouts, as well
as responding to any oil spills. Following this task, KBR will perform emerg
ency repair, as directed, to provide for the continuity of operations of the
Iraqi oil infrastructure."


Hall said KBR is assisting Iraq's oil ministry to get the oil system
operating.


Waxman countered, "Only now, over five weeks after the contract was first
disclosed, are members of Congress and the public learning that Halliburton
may be asked to pump and distribute Iraqi oil under the contract."


Waxman also has repeated the Corps' statement that the contract could be
worth up to $7 billion for up to two years, but the Corps said that figure
was a cap based on a worst-case scenario of oil well fires. In fact, few
wells were burning during the war with Iraq and the Corps said that by early
April, the company had been paid $50.3 million.







_______________________________________________
Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss
To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk
All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk


[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]