The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [casi] US: 'Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction'



Are there any nations that don't have the ability to
develop unconventional weapons?

Andreas Wrote:

05/04/03: ( Sunday Herald)
.......
> This represents a clearly dramatic shift in the
definition of the Bush
> doctrine's central tenet -- the pre-emptive strike.
Previously, according
> to
> Washington, a pre-emptive war could be waged against a
hostile country
> with
> WMDs in order to protect American security.
>
> Now, however, according to the US official, pre-emptive
action is
> justified
> against a nation which simply has the ability to develop
unconventional
> weapons.

_____________________________________________________________________
Zon Breedband Family, 2 keer zo snel als alle andere ADSL aanbieders.
Voor maar 34 euro per maand.
Bestel nu op www.zonnet.nl/breedband en krijg het modem gratis.

_______________________________________________
Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss
To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk
All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk


[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]