The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[casi] New Report: "Water under Siege in Iraq"



If Iraqis "take innocent life, if they destroy infrastructure, they will be held accountable as war 
criminals."
- George W. Bush (Feb. 25, 2003)

Dear Friends,

In urban centers throughout southern and central Iraq, millions of civilians are facing disease and 
possible death due to inadequate access to water as a result of the US/UK invasion.

A new report by the Center for Economic and Social Rights, WATER UNDER SIEGE IN IRAQ, examines the 
possibility that the United States and United Kingdom may commit war crimes by depriving Iraqi 
civilians of safe water.

100,000 children in Basra are already threatened with severe illness due to a crippled water 
treatment plant, according to UNICEF. As American troops advance on Baghdad, the city of five 
million has lost electric power and the population there also faces a pubic health crisis from 
water-borne disease.

International law on this matter is unambiguous--depriving people of life-sustaining resources is a 
war crime. While President Bush has warned Iraqis not to commit war crimes, Anglo-American forces 
at the gates of Baghdad risk committing war crimes themselves against a population that is half 
children.

A full copy of "SPECIAL REPORT: WATER UNDER SIEGE IN IRAQ: US/UK Military Forces Risk Committing 
War Crimes by Depriving Civilians of Safe Water" may be found at 
http://www.cesr.org/iraq/docs/waterundersiege.pdf. The Executive Summary of the report is pasted in 
the body of this message below. For a copy of the press release, please see 
http://www.cesr.org/index.cfm?bay=content.view&catid=538&cpid=403&pressview=1.

In Solidarity,
Jacob Park


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: WATER CRISIS IN SOUTHERN IRAQ

Water is fundamental to life. No one can survive without sufficient water for drinking, cooking, 
washing, and general hygiene. For this reason, international law recognizes access to safe water as 
a basic human right-"indispensable for leading a life in human dignity"-as well as an integral 
component of the rights to life, health, and housing.

The current invasion of Iraq by the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia poses a grave 
threat to the right to water of Iraq's 24 million inhabitants, almost half of them children under 
the age of 15.  Anglo-American military forces have already laid siege to numerous urban centers in 
southern and central Iraq, disrupting electrical, water and sanitations systems that sustain 
millions of civilians.  With the approach of summer, when temperatures in this region regularly 
exceed 120 degrees Fahrenheit, the likelihood of water-borne disease epidemics is alarmingly high.

In Basra, the Anglo-American blockade deprived one million residents of access to safe drinking 
water for almost two weeks.  UNICEF warned that "there are 100,000 children in Basra at risk for 
severe fever and death because one water treatment plant stopped functioning."  The regional 
spokesperson for UNICEF described a "most dire" humanitarian crisis:

"The situation is leading to a rise in disease and we've already seen some incidents of cholera now 
in the south, as well as what we call Black Water Fever, which is extremely deadly if you're under 
5...[The cholera outbreak is] of extreme concern to us because not only does it show that there's 
been a major impact due to unclean water in the area, but also our ability to get in and reach 
these people in the middle of a combat zone is extremely limited right now."

The public health crisis in Basra provides a window into the possible fate of Iraqi civilians in 
Nasiriyah (population 560,200), Najaf (585,600), Kerbala (572,300), Hilla (548,000), Amara 
(351,100), and Baghdad (5.8 million).  Civilians in Baghdad are especially vulnerable given 
expectations of intense aerial bombardment, a tight blockade, and fierce urban combat aimed at 
toppling the Iraqi regime.  On April 3, power was cut to 90% of Baghdad-the result of damage to the 
Al-Doura power station during the American capture of Saddam Airport.

United Nations agencies and the International Committee of the Red Cross have alerted the 
international community to the growing water crisis throughout southern and central Iraq.  UN 
Secretary-General Kofi Annan has stated that "humanitarian assistance would have to be provided by 
the United States and its coalition partners in those areas under their control, consistent with 
their overall responsibility under international law."

Before the war, US and British leaders assured their publics that "liberating" Iraq would be a 
quick and clean military operation, relying on high-tech precision weapons to minimize civilian 
casualties.  The Iraqi people, especially the long-suffering Shi'a majority in the South, were 
expected to welcome Anglo-American forces.  This scenario has not materialized and the Pentagon has 
called for an additional 120,000 American soldiers to supplement 250,000 already in the Persian 
Gulf.

It now appears likely that Anglo-American forces will continue blockading cities in southern and 
central Iraq in preparation for direct urban combat. If as a result electricity is disrupted for 
extended periods, Iraq's entire structure of civilian life support-public health, water and 
sanitation, and food distribution-will collapse, with devastating consequences for the civilian 
population.

The Anglo-American military strategy would therefore impose disproportionate costs on civilian life 
and property in violation of the most fundamental principles of law and humanity. Political and 
military personnel on all sides of the conflict who issue or carry out illegal orders are subject 
to prosecution for war crimes.

In fulfillment of their lawful duties, the Center for Economic and Social Rights urges all warring 
parties-the US, UK, Australia, and Iraq-and all organs of the United Nations-the Security Council, 
General Assembly, and Secretariat-immediately to establish and respect:

- A cease-fire to enable impartial humanitarian agencies, independent of any military forces, to 
restore and maintain life-sustaining services to Iraqi civilians.

- Ongoing humanitarian corridors to enable aid agencies to ensure the survival of vulnerable 
civilian populations throughout the conflict.

- Withdrawal of Anglo-American military forces to positions held before March 19, 2003, to allow 
the United Nations to fulfill its mandate of resolving the Iraq crisis in accordance with the UN 
Charter and international law.


FOR THE COMPLETE REPORT, PLEASE SEE http://www.cesr.org/iraq/docs/waterundersiege.pdf

_______________________________________________
Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss
To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk
All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk


[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]