The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
>> What evidence do we have that the missile that hit >> Shu'ala market did not >> hit precisely its intended target? >Because cruise missiles cost a fortune, and the US are >running out - it's a VERY expensive way to kill about >60 civilians. >If there were deliberately targetting civilians, it's >hardly value-for-money. Lessee.... They use a missile and need to buy a new one: the (future) taxpayers shell out and the arms company makes money. Sounds like a (Bush) plan to me. When did Bush ever try to save the US citizenry money? Drinks for all my friends, barkeep -- just put it on the tab. This attack may not have been "targetted", but I saw a video clip where they were bragging about taking out a truck under a bridge, with a precision munition. We can't expect common sense from these madmen, but pork is nothing new for US politicians. ________________________________________________________________ Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today Only $9.95 per month! Visit www.juno.com _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email email@example.com All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk