The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
Good points, Philippa, but I would like to add another question: the oil-for-food program is part of the sanctions system, so why isn't the lifting of sanctions included in the so-called "liberation" of Iraq? To keep sanctions going after the war would be a scandal. Perhaps the UN could administer humanitarian help for the Iraqis outside the oil-for-food plan through NGO's, as Philippa suggests. But won't extracting oil in Iraq be a problem for a while? Is the UN escrow fund large enough to dip into for humanitarian aid without the further sale of oil? Suzy -----Original Message----- From: casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk [mailto:casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk] On Behalf Of pjw8 Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:06 AM To: casi-discuss; peter kiernan; pjw8 Subject: RE: [casi] oil for food program stopped >Yes, this raises several important issues. First of all, Iraq is effectively now under complete siege BY THE ORDER OF THE UN. If the UN Security Council did not vote for this war, then how is it that the UN oil for food program has been stopped? Saying it is because UN officials running the program, had to leave Iraq, is a poor excuse. In cases of an attack by an aggressor, there should be a back-up plan to keep the income flowing into the country. For example, the UN could have turned the management of the oil for food program over to non- governmental organizations. And, as Peter Kiernan says, where does that leave the UN Escrow Account after the war? The point is, the oil for food program needs to be reinstated as soon as possible, and that falls under the mandate of the UN Security Council. Perhaps someone with contacts on the Security Council, or a media reporter, could follow up on this ASAP, Philippa Winkler ===== Original Message From peter kiernan <pvk66@starpower.net> ===== >There were some media reports last week that the US has a plan to employ >Iraqi soldiers in reconstruction work after the war, and pay their salaries. >Donald Rumsfeld stated that money to pay these salaries would come from >Iraq's overseas frozen assets, and from the Oil for Food program account. To >my knowledge there is no facility in the now suspended program to pay >salaries for civil servants or military personnel, and any change would >require a SC resolution. No-one in the press picked up that the funds for >oil for food are kept in a UN controlled escrow account, and there would be >legality issues if the US or any-one else wanted to get access to it. I >think this is something worth following. >Peter Kiernan >----- Original Message ----- >From: "pjw8" <Philippa.Winkler@NAU.EDU> >To: "casi-discuss" <casi-discuss@lists.casi.org.uk> >Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 4:30 PM >Subject: [casi] oil for food program stopped > > >> Friends, >> The US Department of Energy is now giving daily updates on energy prices >etc, >> because of the war: >> website:http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/security/esar/esar.html. >> >> This was sent by the DoE: >> >> "Production/Export/Infrastructure Developments >> Iraq: As of Thursday morning, Iraqi oil exports effectively were halted >except >> for a small amount of remaining oil to be loaded from storage tanks at >> Turkey's >> port of Ceyhan. This is because, with the departure of UN staff from Iraq >and >> with war appearing imminent, the UN "oil-for-food" program is effectively >on >> hold. Earlier reports had indicated that no oil was leaving Iraq's Persian >> Gulf >> port of Mina al-Bakr, and that buyers were shying away from purchases of >Iraqi >> oil. As of 9 AM Thursday, there have been reports (on Kuwaiti and Iranian >> television) regarding possible oil fires near Basra in southern Iraq. >Iraqi >> Oil >> Minister Rasheed has denied these reports. In statements made on Thursday >> afternoon, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said that he has seen >indications >> that the Iraqi regime may have set fires to oil wells in the South. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. >> To unsubscribe, visit >http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss >> To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk >> All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk > > >_______________________________________________ >Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. >To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss >To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk >All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk