The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [casi] post-war lifting of sanctions...NOT!

[ Converted text/html to text/plain ]

I was  awaken this morning by a radio news report from the French CBC
(Radio-Canada's  Aline Gobeil) who happened to mention this: The UN is
presently reworking its Oil-forFood program to deal with a "reconstructed
post-war Iraq". The Oil-for-Food program WILL THUS STAY after the illegal
U.S.-U.K. invasion. This  will be a reinstatement of the infamous fiasco also
called SMART SANCTIONS. It is to be remembered that the U.S. never agreed with
the 667 UN Committee about the definition of what constituted double usage
goods which, at the last count, made the Holds list of goods through the OFF
program mushroom to 5,4$ billion. The only difference is that the U.S. will
now be in control of the  entire Iraqi Oil sector and will grease itself with
the reconstruction contracts to post-orgasm heights. But since Exxon, Chevron,
Sharon and cos.  are also private companies, it is expected that they will not
be returning much of their "private investment capital" returns to the iraqis.
So  what will the UN be able to syphon off from that mess, since they have had
ZERO influence to stop this ILLEGAL ATTACK on Iraq.
Iraqis, it seems, are to be damned for eternity. It is therefore of the utmost
importance to get as much information NOW about those UN tractations on
so-called "reconstruction" of post-war Iraq.
Marc Azar
Colin Rowat a écrit:

Dear Daniel,

I think that your question is a good one, and a worrying one.  At present,
US plans for a post-war Iraq seem very sketchy: are Iraqis to have the costs
of another war added to their already crippling levels of financial
obligation; what are US intentions viz. the lifting of sanctions now that
Saddam, to whom the US has always tied them, seems to be in his last weeks;
is an unstable, future Iraq to be left to twist as Bush returns to his
presidential election campaign, leaving Middle East policy to his hawks?

The underlying legislation authorising the sanctions are the Security
Council resolutions.  Thus, a new SCR will be necessary to lift or otherwise
modify the sanctions.  When this is passed, national governments then pass
implementing legislation, making a national version of the SCR part of their
national law.

I do think that learning and lobbying on this will be vital over the coming
weeks, and would encourage list members to begin to think in this direction.
Whether one has supported or opposed the war, all of our arguments have been
presented in terms of concern for Iraqis.  If the Iraqi regime is replaced,
then we should all, I hope, be able to agree that we need to work to ensure
that the next Iraqi government is just, and given a chance of survival.
Lifting non-military sanctions, not adding further liabilities to Iraq's
already high financial obligations, and reducing its existing one, will, I
suspect, be central elements of this.

Less economically, I suspect that attempts to restore ties between Iraqis in
Iraq and those of us living outside Iraq will be important.  For some years,
the idea of twinning programmes has floated around our circles.  The
environment for this may become more favourable in the near future.  If list
members are members of churches, synagogues, mosques, trades unions, sports
teams, schools, or the like, twinning with a similar Iraqi group may be a
very practical step that can be taken to help bridge the gulf that I fear
has been growing.

My feelings have been very mixed for a long time now, and remain so.  I do
think, though, that we have a chance at winning the peace, and helping
protect seeds of hope in Iraq.  (A few days ago, I saw the 'Support
Democracy in Iraq' image on and felt inspired: here
is a new Iraq that I can feel excited about!)

Best wishes,

Colin Rowat

work | Room 406, Department of Economics | The University of Birmingham |
Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK | | (+44/0) 121 414 3754 |
(+44/0) 121 414 7377 (fax) |[1]

personal | (+44/0) 7768 056 984 (mobile) | (+44/0) 7092 378 517 (fax) |
(707) 221 3672 (US fax) |[2]

-----Original Message-----
[[4]]On Behalf Of Daniel
Sent: 18 March 2003 7:03 PM
Subject: [casi] post-war lifting of sanctions

We tend to assume that sanctions will be lifted after the US/UK invasion
of Iraq, but has anyone looked into the mechanics of lifting sanctions, in
terms of UN and national legislation? What new laws will need to be

Since sanctions are probably quite low down Bush/Blair's list of
priorities, and since I don't have much faith in their competence, I'm
worried that it will take months after the end of war before sanctions are

Where should I look for information? Do list members think we need to
lobby on this, or will it happen by itself?

Dan O'Huiginn

Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit[6]
To contact the list manager, email[7]
All postings are archived on CASI's website:[8]

Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit[9]
To contact the list manager, email[10]
All postings are archived on CASI's website:[11]


Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit
To contact the list manager, email
All postings are archived on CASI's website:

[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]