The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[casi] Africa endorses Chirac and L.A passes ant war resol.

[ Presenting plain-text part of multi-format email ]

Chirac Fortifies Antiwar Caucus
52 African Leaders Endorse French Stance Toward Iraq

By Glenn Frankel
Washington Post Foreign Service
Saturday, February 22, 2003; Page A19
LONDON, Feb. 21 -- French President Jacques Chirac emerged today from a summit of 52 African 
countries -- including three that hold seats on the U.N. Security Council -- with a unanimous 
endorsement of France's opposition to U.S.-led military action against Iraq.
"There is an alternative to war," said a summit statement issued in Paris Thursday night and 
reaffirmed by Chirac at a news conference this morning. "The use of force, which entails serious 
risks of destabilization for the region, for Africa and the world, should only be a last resort," 
the statement said.
Analysts said the statement signaled France's determination to forge and hold together a majority 
in the 15-member Security Council to block U.S. and British efforts to pass a new resolution that 
could be used as an endorsement for war.
"The French are not sitting back and passively leaving the initiative to the United States and 
Britain," said Steven Everts, research fellow at the Center for European Reform, a research 
organization in London. "They are proactive and working to solidify their support, and they're very 
good at this kind of diplomatic three-dimensional chess game."
Chirac has said repeatedly that he sees no need for a second U.N. resolution to build on one passed 
in November, and he has indicated that France would use its veto power against such an effort. At 
the same time, his government has worked to line up enough votes in the council to defeat such a 
resolution, which would make a French veto unnecessary. Passage of a resolution requires nine votes.
It was unclear today whether Chirac's strategy was aimed solely at turning back a new U.S.-British 
resolution, or whether France and other nations opposed to military action would propose their own 
resolution next week about disarming Iraq.
Analysts said such a resolution could be based on an initiative that France and Germany broached 
two weeks ago that would double or triple the number of U.N. weapons inspectors in Iraq, intensify 
monitoring of Iraqi territory by using French, German and Russian aircraft along with U.S. U-2 spy 
planes, and put in place a "specialized corps" of armed U.N. forces to guard sites already 
Of the Security Council's five permanent, veto-holding members, the United States and Britain favor 
a tough new resolution, while France, Russia and China want inspections to continue.
Countries that hold the council's 10 rotating seats, which wield no veto, are also split; only 
Spain and Bulgaria are committed to supporting the United States and Britain. Syria and Germany are 
firmly opposed. That leaves the three African members -- Angola, Cameroon and Guinea -- plus 
Mexico, Chile and Pakistan, as potentially up for grabs.
The declaration from the Paris summit appears to place the African nations in the antiwar camp. The 
summit, an annual convocation, also focused on the civil war in Ivory Coast and repression in 
Zimbabwe under President Robert Mugabe.
In the wake of opinion polls in Britain and throughout Europe that reflect widespread opposition to 
military action in Iraq without U.N. support, Prime Minister Tony Blair of Britain has pressed for 
a resolution that would declare Iraq in material breach of U.N. demands for disarmament. British 
officials have said they hope to present a new resolution sometime in the next few weeks.
Blair was in Rome today to meet with Pope John Paul II, who has expressed strong opposition to 
military action, and to lend support to Italy's prime minister, Silvio Berlusconi. The Italian 
leader has been a strong advocate of military action but, like Blair, has been under mounting 
political pressure to allow the weapons inspectors more time.
Berlusconi's four-party governing coalition has agreed to let the United States use Italian air 
space, transport facilities and military bases for an invasion, but has said it wants a second U.N. 
resolution before war begins.
Responding to the French-African statement, State Department officials said that Walter H. 
Kansteiner, assistant secretary of state for African affairs, met Thursday with President Jose 
Eduardo dos Santos of Angola and would meet in coming days with senior officials of the other two 
African Security Council members.
But Chirac, who has become the de facto spokesman of antiwar forces in Europe and around the world, 
appeared to be one step ahead of his U.S. and British counterparts. He said at today's news 
conference that he was confident he could hold together a coalition opposed to war.
"As things stand today, everything points to the need for [disarmament] to be achieved through 
peaceful means . . . and not by a military route," Chirac said.
Analysts said Chirac was forging an antiwar coalition with such success that it would be difficult 
for him to back down at a later stage and find some compromise with the United States and Britain. 
Divisions have been solidified by heated rhetoric of recent days: Chirac has told East European 
nations supporting the U.S. position to "keep quiet," while Secretary of State Colin L. Powell told 
a French radio interviewer that "certain countries are afraid of upholding their responsibility."
"All of the scenarios I can outline right now have various shades of black," said Francois 
Heisbourg, director of the Foundation for Strategic Research in Paris. He said a French veto or a 
U.S. decision to initiate military action without U.N. approval would be equally damaging for 
trans-Atlantic relations. "There seems to be an abyss of mutual misunderstanding."

L.A. City Council Votes Against Iraq WarBy THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Filed at 1:32 a.m. ET

LOS ANGELES (AP) -- The Los Angeles City Council approved a resolution Friday opposing a unilateral 
war against Iraq and urging the Bush administration to exhaust all diplomatic options before 
committing military forces.

Mayor James Hahn signed the resolution, which passed the council on a 9-4 vote, making it the 
city's official position on Iraq.

``I hope people understand we're not a bunch of crazy politicians trying to dictate federal 
policy,'' said Councilman Ed Reyes, who voted for the resolution. ``We are echoing the sentiments 
of people who are hurting. Where do we begin to matter in the priority of our federal dollars?''

The resolution said the billions of dollars that would be spent on war would likely cause further 
cuts in federally funded programs that benefit the city. War would also draw away hundreds of 
police officers and other city employees who are military reservists, it said.

In opposing the resolution, Councilman Jack Weiss said the city should focus on urgent needs, such 
as increased funding for anti-terrorist security in Los Angeles. ``We don't serve our constituents 
well by focusing on a divisive foreign policy matter that is completely beyond our control,'' he 

At least 90 other local governments across the country have passed similar resolutions, including 
Chicago, Philadelphia and Detroit.

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, and more

Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit
To contact the list manager, email
All postings are archived on CASI's website:

[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]