The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
[ Presenting plain-text part of multi-format email ]
Here is the most recent US plan as reported in the NY times today:
The other part of the administration's strategy is no less important, especially given the
opposition to force by France and other countries, officials said. This relates to its plans to
present Iraq with specific tasks in the next two weeks that would make clear its willingness to
cooperate.
These tasks would include allowing weapons inspectors to interview Iraqi scientists without
government "minders" present, the destruction of missiles that were recently found to have greater
range than the United Nations allows, and permitting unconditional overflights by American,
European and Russian reconnaissance aircraft.
"We are looking for some early benchmarks, specific things that the Iraqis will have to do
to show full compliance," an administration official said.
He said that Hans Blix agreed to setting such benchmarks when he met with Powell on Friday
after the contentious Security Council session.
U.S. and British planners hope that once it is obvious Iraq is refusing to carry out these
tasks, Blix will tell the United Nations forthrightly that Iraq is failing to comply with the
disarmament demands of last November's
Security Council Resolution 1441.
COMMENT: All of these requirements are obvious strategems to bolster the US case and facilitate
the planned US invasion.
The US would be happy to spirit Iraqi scientists away, bribe them with offers of sanctuary
and then report any stories that support their contentions as evidence. So far the UN has not
facilitated this
but no doubt there will be pressure to do so. The US hopes to have interviews in other countries
where the US will press the UN to turn scientists over to them to provide asylum. Testimony whether
true or false will be used
as evidence that Hussein has weapons of mass destruction.
The destruction of of missiles will rob Iraq of crucial
defensive weapons in the event of war. The missiles have only a marginally greater range than
allowed.
In fact if Iraq is right they would not exceed specifications when completely fitted out.
The reconnaissance
aircraft will provide very useful intelligence for a US invasion. Given that all of these
requirements further
US and UK schemes for an invasion the hope is that Hussein will balk and this will provide the
excuse for a resolution justifying force.
_______________________________________________
Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss
To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk
All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk