The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
--- John Simons <John.Simons@lshtm.ac.uk> wrote: > Dear List > > Can anyone refer me to published papers or reports > that offer a convincing explanation (grounded in > evidence) of why the effect of sanctions on child > deaths was so much greater in the South/Centre of > Iraq than in the 'autonomous' region in the North? That would be an extreemly difficult task to perform without a team of people in Iraq. The 'civilised' world always insists that although the Iraqis cannot treat their water properly and cannot import nessersary drugs, and that it used DU, and that it bombed Al-Amariyeh, it never has killed any children. The only 'respected' document that states otherwise is the famous one from UNICEF (to the best of my knowledge), avaliable on the CASI website, www.casi.org.uk Nothing is ever as simple as it seems is it :) Alun __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email firstname.lastname@example.org All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk