The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
To Eric & List, If I quoted you out of context then that was certainly not the intention. However, I stand by my declared views, & we shouldn't get involved in petty bickerings about this word or that. I hadn't expected everyone to agree with everything I said, that would be have been unusual for a discussion group. Santions or bombings, re. Iraq's water supplies? I don't accept that sanctions alone were intended to degrade the water supplies. As a result of devastating bombings, conditions for disease would be prevalent. If all the water systems had been affected by bombings, it takes little adding up to to see that diseases (water-born & others) would follow. Bert G. _________________________________________________________________ Stay in touch with absent friends - get MSN Messenger http://messenger.msn.co.uk _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email firstname.lastname@example.org All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk