The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [casi] (no subject)

[ Presenting plain-text part of multi-format email ]

What is especially worrisome about the Washington Post story (original message, bottom of e-mail) 
is the fact it comes on the heels of the Pentagon (mis)information story:

Most people believe the Pentagon when they say they won't be engaging in misinformation.  An even 
higher percentage believe the Pentagon when they say America wasn't ever considered a target of 
this misinformation.  Then, suddenly, the press is convincing people that Saddam is going to 
destroy his own infrastructure in a "scorched-earth" policy.  Of course, that's an ancient 
defensive strategy, but it's been used much more recently:

3. President Bush ordered the destruction of facilities essential to civilian life and economic 
productivity throughout Iraq.
Systematic aerial and missile bombardment of Iraq was ordered to begin at 6:30 p.m. EST January 16, 
1991, eighteen and one-half hours after the deadline set on the insistence of President Bush, in 
order to be reported on television evening news in the U.S. The bombing continued for forty-two 
days. It met no resistance from Iraqi aircraft and no effective anti-aircraft or anti-missile 
ground fire. Iraq was defenseless.

The United States reports it flew 110,000 air sorties against Iraq, dropping 88,000 tons of bombs, 
nearly seven times the equivalent of the atomic bomb that destroyed Hiroshima. 93% of the bombs 
were free falling bombs, most dropped from higher than 30,000 feet. Of the remaining 7% of the 
bombs with electronically guided systems, more than 25% missed their targets, nearly all caused 
damage primarily beyond any identifiable target. Most of the targets were civilian facilities.
The intention and effort of the bombing of civilian life and facilities was to systematically 
destroy Iraq's infrastructure leaving it in a preindustrial condition. Iraq's civilian population 
was dependent on industrial capacities. The U.S. assault left Iraq in a near apocalyptic condition 
as reported by the first United Nations observers after the war.[8] Among the facilities targeted 
and destroyed were:
   electric power generation, relay and transmission;
   water treatment, pumping and distribution systems and reservoirs;
   telephone and radio exchanges, relay stations, towers and transmission facilities;
   food processing, storage and distribution facilities and markets, infant milk formula and 
beverage plants, animal vaccination facilities and irrigation sites;
   railroad transportation facilities, bus depots, bridges, highway overpasses, highways, highway 
repair stations, trains, buses and other public transportation vehicles, commercial and private 
   oil wells and pumps, pipelines, refineries, oil storage tanks, gasoline filling stations and 
fuel delivery tank cars and trucks, and kerosene storage tanks;
   sewage treatment and disposal systems;
   factories engaged in civilian production, e.g., textile and automobile assembly; and
   historical markers and ancient sites.

As a direct, intentional and foreseeable result of this destruction, tens of thousands of people 
have died from dehydration, dysentery and diseases caused by impure water, inability to obtain 
effective medical assistance and debilitation from hunger, shock, cold and stress. More will die 
until potable water, sanitary living conditions, adequate food supplies and other necessities are 
provided. There is a high risk of epidemics of cholera, typhoid, hepatitis and other diseases as 
well as starvation and malnutrition through the summer of 1991 and until food supplies are adequate 
and essential services are restored.

Only the United States could have carried out this destruction of Iraq, and the war was conducted 
almost exclusively by the United States. This conduct violated the UN Charter, the Hague and Geneva 
Conventions, the Nuremberg Charter, and the laws of armed conflict. <<

Now, when the war is over, and Iraq's infrastructure is destroyed, with all its oil wells on fire, 
who will be blamed?  Try telling someone it was actually the USA that set many of those wells on 
fire in the first Bush War, and see what kind of reaction you get.  After Bush War II, it will be 
even more difficult to convince people of who is really to blame.  It's amazing what an unlimited 
PR budget can get you.

Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power.

We have guided missiles, and misguided men.


 "Suzy T. Kane" <> wrote:
[ Presenting plain-text part of multi-format email ]

Dear All,

Have we fallen down the rabbit hole? How do you respond to an article
like this? Suzy
'Scorched Earth' Plans in Iraq Cited
Officials Also Warn Germ War Possible
By Bradley Graham
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, December 19, 2002; Page A01
U.S. intelligence officials warned yesterday that Iraqi President Saddam
Hussein plans to pursue a "scorched earth" strategy in the event of war
with the United States and would destroy his country's oil fields,
electrical power plants, food storage sites and other facilities while
blaming U.S. military forces for the damage.
The officials, briefing reporters at the Pentagon, said they have
evidence that Hussein, if he believes his government is about to fall,
will try to create a humanitarian crisis that could slow any U.S.
invasion and foster international opposition to the war. They also
warned that Hussein likely will attempt to release biological or
chemical weapons as a last desperate act.
The officials said they cannot predict with certainly which germ or
chemical agents Hussein might unleash, or when or where. But they said
the likely targets would include not only U.S. forces but also Israel
and Kuwait and Iraqi civilians such as Shiite Muslims who have protested
Hussein's rule in the past. Iraq has declared it has no stockpiles of
chemical or biological weapons.
In preparation for such attacks, the officials said, Iraq has likely
shifted some of its stores of anthrax, botulism, ricin and mustard gas
nearer to the forces that would employ them -- special Republican Guard
units and selected air and missile units located in the central part of
the country. To undercut any order that might come from Hussein, the
Bush administration has begun warning Iraqi officers that they will be
held personally responsible for releasing any weapons of mass
"Saddam's point of view is, you fight with everything you've got," one
official said. "He might use it right away, but he'll certainly use it
when he thinks he's about to fall."
Similar U.S. intelligence assessments preceded the Persian Gulf War in
1991 that evicted Iraqi invasion forces from Kuwait, but few proved
accurate as U.S. and allied ground troops encountered relatively little
Iraqi resistance. It was impossible to independently assess the
reliability of yesterday's comments by intelligence officials or the
motivation for giving the briefing.
Although the Bush administration has an obvious interest in demonizing
Hussein as it lays out a public case for war, a military spokesman
attributed the timing of the briefing to a buildup of reporters'
requests for an assessment of Iraq's military strength and intentions in
the event of war. The intelligence officials declined to specify the
evidence to further their case, saying it would compromise sources.
Other officials have argued that, unlike 1991, Hussein will be more
willing to fight with nonconventional means because his own government's
existence would be at stake.
The Iraqis have been preparing for war since immediately after the Sept.
11, 2001, attacks in New York and Washington, believing they would be a
U.S. target, the intelligence officials said. They have accelerated
imports of spare parts, moved ammunition closer to troop positions and
dug trenches for soldiers and military vehicles. They also have begun
placing trucks, concrete barriers and other obstacles on runways at key
air bases where U.S. invasion forces might attempt to land.
But instead of planning to engage U.S. troops along Iraq's borders and
in the open desert, as they did in the 1991 war, Hussein's commanders
intend to use rivers and other natural features as obstacles to any U.S.
advance and to set up a layered defense with Baghdad at the center, the
officials said.
Iraq's ground and air forces are considerably weaker and smaller than
they were in 1991, short on modern equipment, spare parts and training
time, the officials said. Morale is low, and so is the Iraqi military's
confidence in its ability to battle U.S. troops, they said.
There are about 375,000 Iraqi ground troops, down from more than 1
million a decade ago. Some divisions are manned at only half their
authorized levels, and many lack such basic components as reconnaissance
units and military police.
"The regular army is not motivated to fight for Saddam, and we don't
think they're going to last very long," one official said.
Iraq's six Republican Guard divisions, which are better equipped and
trained and number about 90,000 troops, are expected to fight longer.
But the U.S. analysts said they have solid evidence that Hussein is
concerned about morale even in these elite forces.
The Iraqi air force, with roughly 300 fighter jets, is less than half
the size it was in 1991 and is not regarded as a major threat. Iraqi
pilots receive on average only 20 to 50 hours of training annually, and
when they do fly, "it's basically stick and rudder stuff" rather than
serious tactical training, one U.S. official said.
A relatively brighter spot for Iraq's military is its air defense
system, which remains largely intact despite years of intermittent
strikes by U.S. warplanes patrolling "no-fly" zones in the north and
south of the country. The U.S. officials noted that Iraq has kept most
of its surveillance radars and antiaircraft missile batteries in the
central part of the country, out of reach of U.S. planes.
Additionally, Iraqis have shown considerable resourcefulness in
repairing facilities that are damaged by U.S. airstrikes, drawing on
spare parts from some former Soviet republics, the officials said.
Chinese and Turkish companies have helped Iraq lay a nationwide
fiber-optic network, providing communication links among military
facilities that are more effective and more difficult for U.S. forces to
"It's really an issue of disruption, not permanent destruction," one
official said of the real impact of the U.S. airstrikes.
Iraq's military would be in even worse shape, the official said, if not
for large amounts of imported equipment, including trucks, air defense
parts and night vision devices.
Many of the imports have been smuggled into the country in violation of
international economic sanctions, with Syria serving as a major conduit,
the official said. But some have arrived with United Nations approval,
such as hundreds of pieces of earth-moving equipment that ended up being
converted into missile launchers.
C 2002 The Washington Post Company

Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit
To contact the list manager, email
All postings are archived on CASI's website:

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now

Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit
To contact the list manager, email
All postings are archived on CASI's website:

[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]