The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
Roger, This is a huge subject. Below is today's entry on firstname.lastname@example.org... well worth subscribing too (politics are Ross Perot, so it gives you an idea of what some segments of Middle America are thinking,) Philippa THE MICE EXPERIMENTS DECEMBER 13. Journal of Virology 75, 1205-1210. That's the citation for the experiment in which mouse pox was turned into a killer that wiped out lab mice in Australia. The scientists had tinkered with the virus to try to create sterility in the common pest. Instead, the inserted gene crippled an aspect of the immune system---bringing about .... Full story MORE ON THE MICE DECEMBER 13. This digs a little deeper into the Australian scandal re those mice who were injected with a genetically altered mouse pox virus which then, unexpectedly, killed them. This follows my principle, honed over long years of study on fraudulent and generally cowboy research: IF THE MECHANISM BY WHICH SOME RESULT IS OBTAINED IS UNKNOW.... Full story THE IRAQ REPORT TO THE UN DECEMBER 13. I adivise you to go to my archive and find my piece written on October 20, 2001. It details some of the massive bio/chem-war shipments out of the US to Saddam. Which brings up the interesting question: ARE ALL THOSE US COMPANIES AND FEDERAL AGENCIES ACTUALLY NAMED IN THE CURRENT PAGES IRAQ HAS HANDED OVER TO THE UN/US?? Is the.... Full story >===== Original Message From VnStroope@aol.com ===== >[ Presenting plain-text part of multi-format email ] > >Apparently after the "Homeland Security Corporate Giveaway" has, by law, >limited pharmaceutical company's liability for anything that their wares >might inflict upon folks, we are going to administer 500,000 doses of >smallpox vaccine to US service people. > >I can only imagine that this is a multimillion dollar payday for some US >based pharmaceutical company, but is perhaps somewhat dangerous for the >recipients. > >So, is there any credible intelligence that suggests that this is anything >other than corporate welfare for the manufacturer? And if we do have >credible information that this may be important for "our" protection, (this >is like a burglar wearing a bullet proof vest while breaking into your home) >isn't it interesting that the government of the USA is more interested in >protecting the military, and far less interested in protecting the citizenry? > >Priorities.... > > >Roger Stroope >Treat others not as you wish to, but as they wish to be... >Austin College, Sherman Texas > > > > >_______________________________________________ >Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. >To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss >To contact the list manager, email email@example.com >All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email firstname.lastname@example.org All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk