The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
News, 15-22/11/02 (5) NO FLY ZONES * Coalition resumes no-fly zone strikes * U.S. accuses Iraq of shooting at jets * 7 civilians killed in US-British raids: Iraq * No-fly zones: The legal position * Allies bomb air defenses in northern Iraq for second straight day; leaflets dropped in southern Iraq * US warplanes strike Iraqi air defence sites * U.N. opposes U.S. stand on Iraq no-fly zone violation * United States bombs three Iraqi air defense facilities * Western Planes Bomb Targets in South REMNANTS OF DECENCY * Thousands rally against Iraq war * Greeks Protest Against War in Nov 17 Rally * Atlantan in Iraq on medical mission * Testimony in Support of Baltimore's Anti-Iraq War Resolution NO FLY ZONES http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/320/nation/Coalition_resumes_no_fly_zone_s trikes+.shtml * COALITION RESUMES NO-FLY ZONE STRIKES Boston Globe, 16th November WASHINGTON (Associated Press): Iraq fired on US and British warplanes patrolling a no fly zone yesterday, an act the United States considers a breach of a UN Security Council resolution, a US official said. Coalition warplanes bombed an Iraqi air defense site in retaliation, a Pentagon statement said. It was the first coalition strike on Iraq since Saddam Hussein's government accepted the UN Security Council resolution demanding that he disarm and allow inspectors to search for chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons. Under the UN resolution, any material breach of the resolution must be reported to the Security Council for new debate - and, according to the Bush administration, could be used as justification for US-led military action to topple Hussein's government. The US official who said the government considers the firing a material breach could not say whether American officials would raise the issue with the United Nations. President Bush and other US officials have said that firing on coalition planes patrolling the northern and southern no-fly zones would violate the latest UN resolution. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and other Pentagon officials, however, have been vague about whether Iraq's hostile actions in the no-fly zones would trigger a wider US-led attack. Lieutenant Colonel David Lapan, a Pentagon spokesman, said last night that Iraq had fired surface-to-air missiles and antiaircraft artillery at coalition planes. Coalition planes using precision-guided weapons attacked an air-defense communications facility near An Najaf, about 85 miles southeast of Baghdad, a Pentagon statement said. The strike happened at 2:50 p.m. EST. On Sunday, coalition planes bombed two surface-to-air missile sites near Tallil, 175 miles southeast of Baghdad. http://www.swissinfo.org/sen/Swissinfo.html?siteSect=143&sid=1460026 * U.S. ACCUSES IRAQ OF SHOOTING AT JETS by Chris Baltimore Swissinfo.com, 16th November WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States says it has the option of declaring Baghdad in violation of a new U.N. Security Council resolution after Iraqi forces fired at American and British warplanes patrolling a "no-fly" zone. But it was unclear whether Washington would press its case given dissent over interpretation of the resolution with key U.S. allies, including Britain. U.S. and British warplanes bombed an air defence communications centre in southern Iraq on Friday after Iraqi forces fired artillery and missiles at the aircraft patrolling a "no-fly" zone in the south, the U.S. military said. Iraq said on Saturday that seven people were killed and four others wounded after U.S. and British planes attacked targets in southern Iraq. Iraqi anti-aircraft and missile batteries fired at the planes, an Iraqi statement said. "Iraq's failure to comply with its obligations under Paragraph 8 would constitute a material breach," a State Department spokesman said, referring to a U.N. resolution aimed at dismantling the alleged nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. Paragraph 8 of the November 8 resolution says Baghdad cannot "take or threaten hostile acts" against a U.N. member "seeking to uphold any council resolution." "It is an option that is available to the United States -- to refer that violation of the resolution to the Security Council," the State Department spokesman said. "We have interpreted the resolutions to mean that option is available," the spokesman said, refusing to specify if or when the United States would exercise such an option. Controversy over the no-fly zones was one of two major disputes in the Security Council, with Russia, France and other members worried about "hidden triggers" in the resolution that would allow unilateral military action by Washington. Under the measure, U.N. inspectors are to declare or verify any major violation by Iraq and report it to the 15-member Security Council, which must then "assess" whether it is a "material breach" -- two words that could lead to war. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/html/uncomp/articleshow?artid=285 04684 * 7 CIVILIANS KILLED IN US-BRITISH RAIDS: IRAQ Times of India (from AFP), 17th November BAGHDAD: US and British warplanes killed seven Iraqis and wounded four others in air raids on "civilian installations" in the southern province of Najaf, a military spokesman said Saturday. "Seven civilians were killed and four others wounded" in the raid by US and British planes on Friday night in Najaf province, some 200 km south of Baghdad, the spokesman said, cited by the state INA news agency. "The American and British murderers have committed a new crime against the Iraqi people," he said. The planes, based in Kuwait, carried out 48 sorties against several targets in the south, he added. "Our missile batteries and anti-aircraft defences resisted these planes, forcing them to flee to their bases," he said. The Pentagon had said on Friday that US warplanes bombed an air defence communications facility in southern Iraq after coalition aircraft came under Iraqi fire in what it described as a violation of last week's UN Security Council resolution. The US Central Command said the target of the strike was an air defence communications facility in Najaf. A defence official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said US warplanes have come under surface-to-air fire from Iraqi forces 11 times since UN Security Council Resolution 1441 was passed November 8. Besides setting out the terms of new UN arms inspections, the resolution ordered Iraq not to take or threaten hostile acts against any member state "taking action to uphold any council resolution." The latest US air strike was the second since the resolution was unanimously approved by the 15-member UN Security Council. Iraq has routinely fired on US and British aircraft over southern and northern Iraq since 1998, when it shut down the first UN arms inspection regime. The no-fly zones were imposed by the Western powers after the 1991 Gulf War to stop Iraqi attacks on Shiite Muslim and Kurdish minorities but are not explicitly covered by any UN resolution. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/2490361.stm * NO-FLY ZONES: THE LEGAL POSITION BBC, 18th November The two no-fly zones over Iraq were imposed by the US, Britain and France after the Gulf War, in what was described as a humanitarian effort to protect Shia Muslims in the south and Kurds in the north. The justification was that an acute humanitarian crisis made it necessary to infringe the sovereignty of Iraq in this way. However, unlike the military campaign to expel Iraqi forces from Kuwait, the no-fly zones were not authorised by the United Nations and they are not specifically sanctioned by any Security Council resolution. The Western powers - led by President George Bush senior - argued that their action was consistent with Security Council Resolution 688 adopted on 5 April 1991. The resolution condemned the repression of the Iraqi civilian population and demanded that Iraq end it immediately. It said the repression amounted to a threat to international peace and security - a phrase often used to justify intervention. But critics of the no-fly zones point out that the resolution did not say the Security Council was acting under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, which provides for enforcement action. Nor did it say that all necessary means could be used. Critics add that whatever was justified in 1991 is not necessarily justified more than 10 years later, when the reasons for continuing the air patrols may have changed. France no longer takes part in policing the no-fly zones, and the US and the UK are now alone in the Security Council in insisting that their frequent bombing of Iraqi targets is covered by international law. Many UK ministers say that under international law, there is a right to intervene to prevent a humanitarian catastrophe. They point out that Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein has hurt his people before - when he used chemical weapons to kill 5,000 Kurdish villagers in the 1980s. Other countries, notably China and Russia, have condemned the no-fly zones as a violation of Iraqi sovereignty, and they insist there is no backing for the policy under international law or UN resolutions. The northern no-fly zone was declared after the end of the Gulf War in March 1991 to protect Kurds against military action which had driven huge numbers of people across the borders into Turkey and Iran. Subsequently, the US, UK and France set up safe havens on the ground in northern Iraq, to which the refugees returned. In a separate move, Iraqi aircraft were also prohibited from flying over the southern half of the country, in order to hamper President Hussein's operations against the Shia population there. Since UN weapons inspectors withdrew from Iraq shortly before a three-day US-UK bombardment in late 1998 known as Operation Desert Fox, the two Western powers have kept up their attacks whenever Iraqi air defences have locked onto aircraft patrolling the no fly zones. Baghdad says hundreds of civilians have died in these attacks. The US and British air forces have disputed some of these figures, and insist they never target civilian areas. However, the raids have provided ammunition for Iraqi efforts to garner support for an end to its international isolation. The latest UN resolution on the disarmament of Iraq does not mention the no-fly zones, but it does stipulate that Baghdad should not take or threaten hostile acts directed against any member state taking action to uphold Secuirty Council resolutions. This is the most likely clause Washington will refer to if it wants to assert that firing on British and American planes amounts to a violation of the UN resolution. http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/134578622_webairstrike18.h tml * ALLIES BOMB AIR DEFENSES IN NORTHERN IRAQ FOR SECOND STRAIGHT DAY; LEAFLETS DROPPED IN SOUTHERN IRAQ by Robert Burns Seattle Times, 18th November WASHINGTON ‹ For the second day in a row, allied warplanes patrolling a no-fly zone in northern Iraq came under fire from anti-aircraft artillery and responded by bombing near the city of Mosul, U.S. officials said. Also, U.S. planes bombed three sites in southern Iraq after Iraqi air defense units fired multiple surface-to-air missiles and anti-aircraft artillery at the planes. Separately, the U.S. Central Command said U.S. planes dropped 120,000 leaflets yesterday near the town of Ar Rumaythah, in southern Iraq. They warn the Iraqi military to stop firing on U.S. and British planes patrolling the southern no-fly zone. It was the fourth leaflet drop in the last eight weeks in the region. One of the leaflets warned Iraqi air defense forces: "Beware: Do not track or fire on coalition aircraft." The back of the leaflet read: "The destruction experienced by your colleagues in other air defense locations is a response to your continuing aggression toward planes of the coalition forces. No tracking or firing on these aircraft will be tolerated. You could be next." Previous leaflet drops had been near the southern cities of Tallil, Basra and As Samawah. In another act of defiance of the no-fly zone patrols, an Iraqi fighter jet today flew south across the 33rd parallel, penetrating about 50 miles into the southern zone, a senior defense official said. There were no American or British fighter jets close enough to respond before the Iraqi jet left, the official said. Another Iraqi aircraft flew into the northern no-fly zone today, the official said, without provoking a U.S. response. The U.S. airstrikes in southern Iraq today targeted an air defense communications facility near Tallil and an air defense radar and communications facility near Al Kut. Both locations are southeast of Baghdad and have been frequent targets of U.S. bombs in recent months. Tallil is an air defense hub for southern Iraq. Iraqi aircraft occasionally fly into the northern or southern zones, but more often Iraqis have fired anti-aircraft artillery or surface-to-air missiles at U.S. and British planes enforcing the zones. At the White House, spokesman Scott McClellan said today the Iraqi firing on coalition aircraft "appears to be a violation" of the United Nations resolution on Iraq. He said the U.N. resolution "does give us that option to refer this violation to the Security Council for discussion." Asked whether the administration would do that, McClellan replied, "We have that option." He added, "Our planes will continue to respond when fired upon." In announcing today's action in northern Iraq, the German-based U.S. European Command said coalition planes used precision-guided weapons to target Iraqi air defense systems, but it provided no specific location. A similar exchange happened yesterday. The European Command statement said all planes used in the operation returned safely to their base. The planes operate from Incirlik air base in southern Turkey. Iraq considers patrols of the northern and southern no-fly zones a violation of its sovereignty and frequently shoots at them. The hostilities have been going on for years but are being watched more closely since Washington has vowed to force President Saddam Hussein to disarm. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/html/uncomp/articleshow?artid=287 54823 * US WARPLANES STRIKE IRAQI AIR DEFENCE SITES Times of India (from AFP), 19th November WASHINGTON: US warplanes retaliated against Iraqi missile and anti-aircraft fire that top US officials said was a "material breach" of the latest UN Security Council resolution, but not serious enough to warrant a war. US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld on Monday told reporters in Santiago, Chile that the Iraqi attacks were "unacceptable," but added: "Someone's characterization of that as something that would trigger an action is incorrect. It's not for us to decide," said a Pentagon official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. "But how would you justify going to war on something you have not vehemently protested before?" The allied airstrikes for the second consecutive day Monday came as UN arms inspectors arrived in Baghdad to resume a hunt for weapons of mass destruction that was suspended in 1998 amid Iraq's refusal to cooperate. F-16 fighter aircraft operating out of Turkey dropped precision bombs on two anti-aircraft artillery sites near the northern city of Mosul after they fired on coalition aircraft, a US defense official said. "Triple-A was reported, and 15 minutes later they rolled in," said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. Just hours later, US and British fighters struck two communications centers and a radar installation in southern Iraq after coalition aircraft came under a barrage of surface-to-air missile and anti-aircraft fire, the US military said. The strikes were carried out by US F/A-18 Super Hornets, F-16 fighters, and British Tornados, which used precision guided weapons in attacks near the towns of Al Kut and Tallil, a US defense official said. A White House spokesman said the Iraqi fire on US and British aircraft enforcing no-fly zones over northern and southern Iraq were in violation of a 10-day-old UN Security Council resolution re-establishing arms inspections. "We do, as you noted, believe it is a violation that would constitute a material breach," said White House spokesman Scott McClellan. "In the resolution it says that Iraq shall not take or threaten hostile acts directed at any representative or personnel of any member state taking action to uphold any council resolution," he said. McClellan said the United States has the option of reporting the breach to the UN Security Council, but he refrained from saying whether it intended to take that step. McClellan said, "Our planes will continue to respond in the manner that they have in the past." In Baghdad, the Iraqi foreign ministry charged that McClellan's comments were another indication that Washington intended to use UN Security Council resolutions as "a cover to justify its aggressive actions against Iraq." Iraq's Vice President Taha Yassin Ramadan told the state-run Iraqi News Agency that the no-fly zones were established unilaterally and "not based on any relevant Security Council resolution." US President George W. Bush, in an interview Monday with Radio Free Europe, made it clear Iraqi President Saddam Hussein must obey the latest UN resolution or he will be disarmed one way or another. "We now have a 17th resolution and this time, I intend to work with nations that love freedom and peace, make sure the resolution stands. And if he doesn't disarm, you're right, I'll lead a coalition of the willing to disarm him," Bush said.. It was the second day in a row that US warplanes have struck Iraqi air defenses after coming under anti-aircraft artillery fire, and the fifth time since the passage of the latest UN Security Council resolution on November 8. In Baghdad, INA quoted a military spokesman as saying US and British warplanes had bombed "civilian and services installations" in the north before being driven away by Iraqi ground defenses. An Iraqi air defense spokesman also said Iraq opened missile and artillery fire on coalition aircraft that staged "69 armed sorties" over southern Iraq on Sunday evening and Monday morning, driving them back to their bases in Kuwait. On Sunday, warplanes from Incirlik Air Base, Turkey bombed air defenses in the north after coming under anti-aircraft artillery fire near Mosul. In southern Iraq, US warplanes dropped two "leaflet bombs" Sunday around the town of Ar Rumaythah, about 160 kilometers (100 miles) southeast of Baghdad, warning Iraqi forces not to fire on coalition aircraft. Iraq has resisted US and British air patrols of the no-fly zones since the last showdown over inspections ended in four days of US bombings in and around Baghdad in December, 1998. According to the Pentagon, Iraqi forces have stepped up their attacks sharply since September 16 when Hussein invited the UN Security Council to resume its inspections. http://asia.reuters.com/news_article.jhtml;jsessionid=WIQGUTT415CSMCRBAEZSFE Y?type=worldnews&StoryID=1768297 * U.N. OPPOSES U.S. STAND ON IRAQ NO-FLY ZONE VIOLATION by Evelyn Leopold Reuters, 20th November UNITED NATIONS: U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan, Britain, Russia and others contradicted U.S. contentions on Tuesday that any violation of the no-fly zones over Iraq breached a new U.N. Security Council resolution. Shortly after the United Nations Security Council adopted a tough resolution on Iraqi disarmament on November 8, the Bush administration said Iraq's attempt to shoot down U.S. and British aircraft over the flight exclusion zone was a violation of the measure. None of the other 14 members of the U.N. Security Council, including Britain, believe the zones are included in the resolution, much less a possible cause for a violation. For the moment, Security Council members are saying little in any meeting after Iraqi troops on Monday again fired on allied aircraft, bringing harsh criticism from Washington. The issue, diplomats said, probably would not be raised until the United States brought the violation to the council, which no one expected Washington to do for the time being. "But if the Iraqis shoot one down, it could be a new ball game all together," said one Western diplomat. Secretary-General Kofi Annan, travelling in Kosovo on Tuesday, told reporters: "Let me say that I don't think that the council will say this is in contravention of the resolution of the Security Council." And in London, a Foreign Office source reaffirmed that Britain sought other justifications under international law for the zones, but the new resolution was not one of them. "We're already on the record as saying threats against our aircraft would not be a material breach of that resolution," he said. Iraq does not recognise the flight exclusion zones, set up by the United States and Western allies unilaterally after the 1991 Gulf War to prevent Baghdad from attacking rebellious Kurds in the north. Later the zone was expanded to prevent attacks against Shi'ite Muslims in the south. Several council members, speaking on condition of anonymity, said eight weeks of arduous negotiations would be for naught if Washington continued, in their eyes, to misinterpret resolution 1441, and then expected support for any future action against Iraq. "It's one thing to keep up 'zero tolerance' to put the squeeze on Iraq," one council source said. "But in practice they know perfectly well that the other 14 council members were voting for disarmament, not the no-fly zone, or there would have been no vote." In Washington, Scott McClellan, a White House spokesman, said on Monday: "The United States believes that firing upon our aircraft in the no-fly zone or British aircraft is a violation. It is a material breach." McClellan said U.S. President George W. Bush's policy toward Iraqi President Saddam Hussein remained one of "zero tolerance" and that clashes over the no-flight zones were "something that we will assess and review" and reserve the option to bring before the Security Council. But Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, in Chile for a meeting with Western Hemisphere defence ministers, was more measured than he had been on the issue in recent weeks. "I do find it unacceptable that Iraq fires," Rumsfeld told a new conference in Santiago. "It is for the president of the United States and the U.N. Security Council to make judgments about their view of Iraq's behaviour over a period of time." Paragraph 8 of the November 8 resolution said Baghdad cannot "take or threaten hostile acts" against a U.N. member "seeking to uphold any council resolution". Resolution 1441 gives Iraq one last chance to disarm or face "serious consequences". Britain's U.N. ambassador, Sir Jeremy Greenstock, co-sponsor of the resolution, told the Security Council before the vote that paragraph 8 referred to any personnel that the inspectors might ask to help them and not the no-fly zones. Diplomats assumed London and Washington had coordinated interpretations and shortly after the 15-0 vote, Russia's U.N. ambassador, Sergei Lavrov, echoed the British view, attributing it to "sponsors of the draft". In Moscow, the Russian Foreign Ministry said on Tuesday: "Recent claims that Iraq's actions in the no-fly zones can be seen as a violation of the U.N. Security Council resolution 1441, have no legal grounds." Some U.S. officials say Washington would not use the Iraqi attacks in the no-fly zone as a sole trigger for war, nor necessarily report them. But U.N. Security Council members say the issue is not one that should be discussed in connection with the resolution. http://www2.bostonherald.com/news/international/ap_bombing11202002.htm * UNITED STATES BOMBS THREE IRAQI AIR DEFENSE FACILITIES Boston Herald, from Associated Press, 20th November WASHINGTON - U.S. warplanes bombed three air defense communications facilities in southern Iraq Wednesday, a day after Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said Washington would immediately respond to attacks on American and British warplanes. Rumsfeld said the United States would retaliate in such circumstances involving the patrolling of no-fly zones regardless of whether the United Nations views the shootings as violations of U.N. resolutions. U.S. warplanes struck at the Iraqi defense facilities after Iraqi air defenses fired surface-to air missiles and anti-aircraft artillery at U.S. and British planes. In a statement, U.S. Central Command said the three targeted facilities were unmanned and located between the cities of Al Kut and Basra. It provided no more precise description of the targets or locations. It said Iraqi air defense forces have fired on U.S. planes six out of seven days since Iraq accepted U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441, which demands that Iraq turn over to inspectors all information about weapons of mass destruction. In his comments, Rumsfeld refused to elaborate on whether he meant retaliatory strikes on Iraqi anti-aircraft sites would continue or was hinting at a stronger response than has been used in the past. "You can be absolutely certain we'll not allow our aircraft to continue to be shot at with impunity. We intend to respond," Rumsfeld told reporters returning to Washington with him Tuesday from a Western Hemisphere military summit in the Chilean capital. He stayed in Washington Tuesday night before heading out to join President Bush at a NATO summit in Prague, Czech Republic. [.....] http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20021121/ts_nm/iraq_usa_dc _3 * WESTERN PLANES BOMB TARGETS IN SOUTH Yahoo, 21st November BAGHDAD (Reuters) - U.S. and British warplanes bombed two air defense radar sites in southern Iraq on Thursday in the latest of a series of strikes in the no-fly zones, the U.S. military said. Iraq said the planes were driven off by anti-aircraft fire in the second consecutive day of Western strikes. The Western warplanes first struck a radar near Ash Shuaybah about 245 miles southeast of Baghdad at 4:20 a.m. EST. Then they bombed a radar near Tallil, about 170 miles southeast of Baghdad about 6:30 a.m. EST, U.S. Central Command said. U.S. defense officials said the strikes were in retaliation for Iraqi air defenses attacking U.S. and British planes that patrol no-fly zones in southern and northern Iraq. "They responded to Iraq moving a surface-to-air missile battery into the southern no-fly zone," said Lt. Col. Dave Lapan, a Pentagon spokesman. An Iraqi military spokesman, quoted by the official Iraqi News Agency, said Western planes bombed "civilian and service installations" in the provinces of Thi Qar and Basra, southeast of Baghdad. Thursday's strike came after U.S. and British warplanes bombed three air defense communications facilities in southern Iraq on Wednesday in response to Iraqi missile attacks. [.....] REMNANTS OF DECENCY http://www.canada.com/hamilton/story.asp?id={DDA2D04C-CAAF-4012-93D5 025A6D77BC6C} * THOUSANDS RALLY AGAINST IRAQ WAR Canadian Press, 16th November TORONTO -- Thousands of demonstrators gathered peacefully under frigid grey skies on the lawn front of the Ontario legislature Saturday as part of a national series of protests this weekend against ongoing sanctions and the possibility of war in Iraq. Carrying signs bearing slogans such as Don't Attack Iraq and Love Heals, protesters cheered as speakers from a variety of labour and peace groups decried military action in Iraq. "The war against Iraq will have a horrific impact against innocent civilians," said Marilyn Churley, an NDP member of provincial parliament who was among the speakers. "Canada should take back our traditional role as peace-makers and say no to war." Protesters later marched from the legislature to the American Embassy. "There's a real need for a peace movement," said Ali Mallah, president of the Toronto chapter of the Canadian Arab Federation. He said the Canadian government needs to stand up on the world stage as an advocate of peace, even if that means disagreeing with its neighbours to the south. "I hate to say it, but we're becoming sort of irrelevant to United States policies and plans," he said The Toronto demonstration, which drew as many as 2,500 people, was organized by a coalition of groups including the Toronto Committee Against Sanctions and War on Iraq, the United Church, Arab organizations, labour unions and other social justice groups. "I strongly don't believe Canada should have anything do with such a war - with or without UN approval," said protester Jerry Berman, 72, who turned out for the protest with his wife after reading about it in a local newspaper. Other demonstrations were planned Saturday for communities across Canada. About 150 protesters demonstrated peacefully in front of city hall in Hamilton, Ont., on Saturday morning. Protests were also expected Saturday in Kingston, Ont., Calgary, Regina, Brandon, Man., Sydney, N.S., and several communities in British Columbia including Prince George, Grand Forks and Nelson. More were planned for Sunday in other communities nationwide. Mallah said an even larger national day of protest is being planned for January 18. Tensions were escalating in the Middle East over the weekend as Iraq fired on U.S. and British planes patrolling a no-fly zone Friday. Coalition planes bombed an Iraqi air defence site in retaliation for the firing. It was the first coalition strike on Iraq since Iraqi President Saddam Hussein's government accepted the United Nations Security Council resolution demanding he disarm and allow inspectors to search for chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. The UN has warned of "serious consequences" if Iraq doesn't comply. The United States has made clear that an Iraqi failure to co-operate will almost certainly mean a new war. Iraq denies it possesses weapons of mass destruction. About 25 United Nations weapons inspectors are set to arrive in Iraq on Monday. Four Canadians have been told to prepare to eventually head to Iraq as weapons inspectors. Canada has not yet committed troops to any war. After inspectors left Iraq in 1998, ahead of U.S.-British air strikes, Baghdad refused to readmit the monitors. It accused them of being American spies and said they could only return after UN trade sanctions had been lifted. Under Security Council resolutions passed after Iraq's 1990 invasion of Kuwait, the sanctions can be lifted only when Iraq proves to the inspectors that it has eliminated its weapons of mass destruction and long-range missiles. http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20021117/wl_nm/greece_prot est_dc_1 * GREEKS PROTEST AGAINST WAR IN NOV 17 RALLY Yahoo, 17th November ATHENS (Reuters) - Thousands of Greek protesters denounced a possible U.S. attack on Iraq on Sunday during an annual march marking a 1973 student revolt which led to the birth of the feared November 17 guerrilla group. Police briefly detained 10 demonstrators after using teargas to disperse groups of self-styled anarchists who hurled firebombs and rocks near the U.S. embassy, disrupting the otherwise peaceful event. There were no reports of injuries. Police said more than 10,000 people marched from the central polytechnic school, site of the revolt, to the U.S. embassy, which has long been blamed for supporting Greece's former military leadership -- the target of the student protest 29 years ago. "No to War in Iraq" and "Americans -- Killers of Nations," read several of the banners carried by demonstrators. U.N. arms inspectors, backed by a U.S. threat of war, are expected in Baghdad on Monday to relaunch a search for any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. About 5,000 police, including riot squads and special forces, guarded the march route in anticipation of heavy turnout, boosted by a roundup of suspect members of the radical leftist November 17 group earlier this year. Members of the group, which was born in the wake of the bloody clampdown on the 1973 student uprising, had eluded capture for decades. Now in custody the 18 suspects have called for supporters -- mainly small groups of anarchists -- to take to the streets on Sunday to demonstrate moral support. Police said more than 500 demonstrators shouted slogans for the release of the guerrilla suspects. The student protest on November 17 marked the beginning of the end for Greece's 1967-74 military rule, and pro-democracy and victim groups have also vowed a big turnout to show violence in Greece is over. November 17 members have claimed responsibility for killing 23 Greeks and foreigners. Their first victim was the Athens CIA chief shot dead in 1975. http://www.accessatlanta.com/ajc/epaper/editions/thursday/news_d3cd08dfd4c91 1b50046.html * ATLANTAN IN IRAQ ON MEDICAL MISSION by Moni Basu - Staff Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 21st November As U.N. weapons inspectors arrived in Iraq on Monday, another plane was simultaneously landing at Baghdad's international airport. It carried Atlanta resident James Jennings --- a man on a very different mission. Hans Blix, the chief U.N. inspector, is in Iraq to look at Saddam Hussein's weapons arsenal. Jennings, who heads the aid group Conscience International, is there to look at medical facilities that he says are war-damaged and ill-equipped to address Iraq's pressing health needs. Jennings has been talking with government officials, professionals and academics about the consequences of another war. "Everyone in Baghdad breathed a collective sigh of relief when the weapons inspectors arrived," he said in a Wednesday telephone interview from Baghdad. "First, Blix talked about the importance of the sanctions as an issue and how lifting them would move Iraq forward," he said. "Secondly, he raised the idea from one of the earlier U.N. resolutions --- that in the Mideast there should be a zone free of weapons of mass destruction. Those are two very big issues here." Jennings, a former professor of Middle East studies, said another war now would destroy the little progress that Iraq has made since the Persian Gulf War. Jennings has made 15 "humanitarian" trips to Iraq, including a September visit led by Rep. Nick Rahall (D-W.Va.) and former Democratic Sen. James Abourezk of South Dakota. An opponent of the sanctions against Iraq, Jennings has taken $2 million in medical aid into Iraq. On his current trip, he is trying to get proper care for a 10-month-old baby suffering from a condition that increases the risk of injuring the spinal cord. "She will die if she doesn't have an operation but she may also die if she has the operation under these conditions," said Jennings, who plans to return to Atlanta next week. "There are 4,000 such children in Iraq who will die without intervention." Many more will suffer, he said, if war comes. "When the weapons inspectors arrived, I told someone here that it was a good beginning," Jennings said. "The response was that it was not the beginning but the outcome that really counts." http://palestinechronicle.com/article.php?story=200211211922408 * TESTIMONY IN SUPPORT OF BALTIMORE'S ANTI-IRAQ WAR RESOLUTION Palestine Chronicle, 21st November "My name is William Hughes. I'm a resident of the 2nd District. I'm here tonight to lend my support to the 'Anti-Iraq War Resolution' .." By William Hughes Re: Council Bill No. 02-0944, "In Opposition to A Declaration of War Against Iraq" Public Hearing-November 20, 2002 Mr. Chairman, the Hon. Robert Curran, and Members of the Baltimore City Council's Judiciary and Legislative Investigations Committee: My name is William Hughes. I'm a resident of the 2nd District. I'm here tonight to lend my support to the "Anti-Iraq War Resolution" and to also to express my objections to the editors of the Baltimore Sun for criticizing this legislative body, in a Nov. 13 editorial, for holding this hearing. The right of the people to Petition their government is a right older than the Republic itself. When the Sunpaper disparaged that right, it only demonstrated its own ignorance of our history, and its indifference to the important issues being considered tonight before this Committee. I believe that there is no justification whatsoever for any U.S. led war against Iraq. And, under no circumstances, should President George W. Bush Jr. take any military action against Iraq, absent the approval of the UN's Security Council. Bush's "Preemptive Strike Doctrine" is just a fancy way of allowing him to attack someone "first" hat he doesn't like. In the Nuclear Age, conducting foreign policy in that kind of reckless manner can lead one tragic day to a nuclear exchange, with possibly Russia, Red China, or North Korea. The nuclear club is growing as I speak. This new and dangerous policy, created by Bush's "Dr. Strangelove," Paul Wolfowitz, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, makes us more prone to a nuclear attack, and not less. Also, our war on terrorism should be against the el Qaeda network, and not the innocent people of Iraq. We know that Iraq has one of the largest oil reserves in the world. We also know that Bush and his Vice President Dick Cheney have been, in the past, part of the lucrative business of "Big Oil." This could be a possible motive for the U.S. wanting to now attack Iraq. After Gulf War I, we left 600,000 pounds of depleted uranium in Iraq. It's a radioactive poison, with a half life of 4.5 billion years. Now, we're planning to do it again, contaminate Iraq, and our own troops, too. Israel, also, wants us to attack Iraq first, and then, Iran! Meanwhile, Israel continues to brutally subjugate the Palestinians, making us more enemies in the Islamic world. Bishop Desmond Tutu and Nelson Mandela both have said: The Israeli oppression of the Palestinians must end! Finally, if we had a foreign policy based on the values and principles of our Republic, and not on the role of "Global Cop," we could have huge peace dividends for our people. And that money, in the billions of dollars, could be used to make our streets safer, educate our children, restore fully this city, and renew the economy of our state. Put America's national interest first. Say "No" to any war with Iraq and pass this Anti-Iraq War Resolution. William Hughes is the author of "Andrew Jackson vs. New World Order" (Authors Choice Press) and "Baltimore Iconoclast" (Writer's Showcase), which are available online. He can be reached at liamhughes@mindspring.com. Palestine Chronicle (palestinechronicle.com). Redistributed via Press International News Agency (PINA). _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk