The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[casi] Annan Says Iraqi No-Fly Zone Firing No Violation



Annan Says Iraqi No-Fly Zone Firing No Violation
Tue November 19, 2002 07:28 AM ET

PRISTINA, Yugoslavia (Reuters) - Iraq's firing on U.S. and British aircraft
enforcing "no-fly" zones in Iraq is not a violation of the latest Security Council
resolution, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan said on Tuesday.

Contradicting the United States' interpretation of Resolution 1441 on Iraq
adopted two weeks ago, Annan indicated that the Security Council would not see
such action by Iraq as a trigger for war.

"Let me say that I don't think that the Council will say this is in
contravention of the resolution of the Security Council," Annan said when asked if
Iraq was violating 1441 by firing at alliance planes, as Washington contends.

Key Security Council member, Russia, also on Tuesday dismissed the U.S.
claims.

"Recent claims that Iraq's actions in the "no-fly" zones can be seen as a
violation of the U.N. Security Council resolution 1441, have no legal grounds,"
the Russian foreign ministry said.

The United States is alone among the 15-member Security Council member states
in insisting that the no-fly zones are included in the resolution and that firing
on the aircraft policing the two zones is therefore a breach of 1441.

This has raised concerns over whether Washington, that says Iraq has
stockpiles of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons technology, could use this
as an automatic trigger for war.

The resolution demands that Iraq reveal and abandon all weapons of mass
destruction and threatens serious consequences if it is found to be "in material
breach" of UN provisions.

On Monday, after Iraqi troops again fired on allied aircraft, a White House
spokesman said their action was "...a violation. It is a material breach."

The spokesman said President Bush's policy on Iraq's adherence to the
resolution was one of "zero tolerance" and its actions against allied aircraft
would be assessed and reviewed, with the possibility of bringing them before the
Council.

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld later toned down the argument, saying
the action was "unacceptable" but it was up to Bush and the Security Council to
"make judgments about their view of Iraqi behavior over a period of time."

An advance team of U.N. weapons inspectors arrived in Iraq on Monday after a
four-year break to fulfill a U.N. mandate to search for any stocks of doomsday
weapons that Iraq may have.

Baghdad does not recognize the flight exclusion areas set up by the Unites
States and its Western allies after the 1991 Gulf War to prevent Baghdad from
attacking rebellious Kurds in the north. Another zone to protect Shi'ites was set
up in the south.

_________________________________________________________
Go see what people are talking about! Express your opinion with everyone on many topics in Maktoob 
Forum.
http://www.maktoob.com/



_______________________________________________
Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss
To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk
All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk


[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]