The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
Last night I read a VERY interesting 60 page document on all the unanswered questions around 9/11. Here is the link for those that have some free time, it's DEFINITELY a worthwhile read... http://rense.com/general31/thr.htm The article suggests it is radical elements within the Jewish religion that are behind 9/11 and most of the terror attacks that have occurred recently. Everything is documented, and a VERY strong case is made. This is TOTALLY opposite of the case Bush and Blair promised to make against Bin Laden. Nothing but speculation, and grainy, doctored VHS tapes are all the multi-billion dollar CIA has been able to come up with. In the aftermath of 9/11, who has benefited more from the terrorist attacks, al Qaeda or Israel? Who stands to benefit the most, and who is most adamantly behind the inevitable war with Iraq? I'm sure most people are afraid to even suggest something like this for fear of being labeled anti-semite. But it is not like I am condemning a whole religion, only a few radical fanatics within a particular religion (the same way the above referenced article does). If this is unacceptable, why is it ok to condemn the entire religion of Islam based on the ALLEGED actions of a few radicals? __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos http://launch.yahoo.com/u2 _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email firstname.lastname@example.org All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk