The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[casi] Carve-up of oil riches begins

Dear list,

Does anyone have background information on the data presented in the article below?



US plans to ditch industry rivals and force end of Opec, write Peter Beaumont and Faisal Islam

Sunday November 3, 2002
The Observer

The leader of the London-based Iraqi National Congress, Ahmed Chalabi, has met executives of three 
US oil multinationals to negotiate the carve-up of Iraq's massive oil reserves post-Saddam.

Disclosure of the meetings in October in Washington - confirmed by an INC spokesman - comes as Lord 
Browne, the head of BP, has warned that British oil companies have been squeezed out of post-war 
Iraq even before the first shot has been fired in any US-led land invasion.

Confirming the meetings to US journalists, INC spokesman Zaab Sethna said: 'The oil people are 
naturally nervous. We've had discussions with them, but they're not in the habit of going around 
talking about them.'

Next month oil executives will gather at a country retreat near Sandringham to discuss Iraq and the 
future of the oil market. The conference, hosted by Sheikh Yamani, the former Oil Minister of Saudi 
Arabia, will feature a former Iraqi head of military intelligence, an ex-Minister and City 
financiers. Topics for discussion include the country's oil potential, whether it can become as big 
a supplier as Saudi Arabia, and whether a post-Saddam Iraq might destroy the Organisation of 
Petroleum Exporting Countries.

Disclosure of talks between the oil executives and the INC - which enjoys the support of Bush 
administration officials - is bound to exacerbate friction on the UN Security Council between 
permanent members and veto-holders Russia, France and China, who fear they will be squeezed out of 
a post-Saddam oil industry in Iraq.

Although Russia, France and China have existing deals with Iraq, Chalabi has made clear that he 
would reward the US for removing Saddam with lucrative oil contracts, telling the Washington Post 
recently: 'American companies will have a big shot at Iraqi oil.'

Indeed, the issue of who gets their hands on the world's second largest oil reserves has been a 
major factor driving splits in the Security Council over a new resolution on Iraq.

If true, it is hardly surprising, given the size of the potential deals. As of last month, Iraq had 
reportedly signed several multi-billion-dollar deals with foreign oil companies, mainly from China, 
France and Russia.

Among these Russia, which is owed billions of dollars by Iraq for past arms deliveries, has the 
strongest interest in Iraqi oil development, including a $3.5 billion, 23-year deal to rehabilitate 
oilfields, particularly the 11-15 billion-barrel West Qurna field, located west of Basra near the 
Rumaila field.

Since the agreement was signed in March 1997, Russia's Lukoil has prepared a plan to install 
equipment with capacity to produce 100,000 barrels per day from West Qurna's Mishrif formation.

French interest is also intense. TotalFinaElf has been in negotiations with Iraq on development of 
the Nahr Umar field.

Planning for Iraq's post-Saddam oil industry is being driven by a coalition of neo-conservatives in 
Washington think-tanks with close links to the Bush administration, and with INC officials who have 
long enjoyed their support. Those hawks have long argued that US control of Iraq's oil would help 
deliver a second objective. That is the destruction of Opec, the oil producers' cartel, which they 
argue is 'evil' - that is, incompatible with American interests.

Larry Lindsey, President Bush's economic adviser, recently said that a successful war on Iraq would 
be good for business.

'When there is a regime change in Iraq, you could add three to five million barrels [per day] of 
production to world supply,' he said in September. 'The successful prosecution of the war would be 
good for the economy.'

Analysts believe that after five years Iraq could be pumping 10m barrels of oil per day. Opec is 
already starting to implode, with member nations breaking quotas in an attempt to grab market share 
before oil prices fall.

Russian concern over a future INC-inspired carve-up of Iraq's oil to the benefit of the US has 
become so intense that it recently sent a diplomat to hold talks with INC officials. At that 
meeting in Washington on 29 August the diplomat expressed concern that Russia would be kept out of 
the oil markets by the US.

A model for the carve-up of Iraq's oil industry was presented in September by Ariel Cohen of the 
right-wing Heritage Foundation, which has close links to the Bush administration.

In The Future of a Post-Saddam Iraq: A Blueprint for American Involvement, Cohen strikes a similar 
note to Chalabi, putting forward a road map for the privatisation of Iraq's nationalised oil 
industry, and warning that France, Russia and China were likely to find that a new INC-led 
government would not honour their oil contracts.

Cohen's proposal would see Iraq's oil industry split up into three large companies, along the areas 
of ethnic separation, with one company in the largely Shia south, another for the Sunni region 
around Baghdad, and the last in the Kurdish north.

~ Anai Rhoads

- - - -
Never befriend the oppressed unless you are prepared to take on the oppressor.

Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at

Single & ready to mingle?  Where singles click. Free to Search!

Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit
To contact the list manager, email
All postings are archived on CASI's website:

[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]