The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[casi] News titles, 11-18/10/02



News titles, 11-18/10/02

Apologies for the late mailing. Last week saw the open session of the
'United Nations' Security Council which gave the real world (as opposed to
the oligarchy that squats on top of it in the 'United Nations' Security
Council) a chance to make its voice heard. If the very few reports I saw in
the press are anything to go by the world had almost nothing of any interest
to say. Rather reminiscent of the Lib Dem and Labour conferences - a chance
to launch a clearly defined opposition to the Oligarchy was lost. Some
shreds of such a thing do seem to exist in South Africa and Malaysia but
hardly anywhere else - not even, it seems, Venezuela, where Hugo Chavez
seems to have been chastened by his brush with US sponsored violence (for
more on this see 'Hugo's Crude Common Ground With America' in Time, 12th
October - http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,364314,00.html).
Closer to Iraq, there is the Turkish military build-up (denied this week) in
Iraqi Kurdistan. One of the most important articles in what follows is
'Kurdistan's fighting men feeling abandoned by their protector', on the US
refusal to provide their Kurdish allies with the means to defend themselves.
Also worthy of note is the analysis of Khidr Hamza's credibility as a
nuclear weapons specialist in ' Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction: A Net
Assessment'. Oh. And there was also the Iraqi election/referendum. About
which I have nothing to say. So far as I can see it was as ridiculous as it
appears to have been and therefore surprising from a government which has, I
believe, handled a horrendously difficult situation with some skill. I can
only see it as having been an excuse for a party.


NEWS, 11-18/10/02 (1)

THE SIDE OF THE ANGELS

*  Turkish doctors stage strike in protest of US war on Iraq
*  Dozens Arrested in San Francisco Anti-War Protest
*  Thousands in Paris Protest Iraq War
*  30,000 rally against war with Iraq [in Melbourne, Australia]
*  Opposition over Iraq takes rise via the Net [Organising international
anti-war solidarity on the web.]
*  Actor Sean Penn Lashes Bush Over Iraq War Drums

FORCES OF DARKNESS (see also White Man's Burden)

*  Rumsfeld's makes military guidelines for Iraq
*  Bush's Road to War on Iraq Leads to Rome's Empire, and Its Downfall [List
correspondent Brian Auten won't like this much because it doesn't give a lot
of evidence, but I think it captures the spirit of the thing.]
*  Wolfowitz Rebuts Concerns About War Against Saddam [Wolfowitz argues that
Saddam should be attacked now because he doesn't have weapons of mass
destruction (yet) and because the necessary head of steam has already been
worked up.]

UNITED KINGDOM

*  Cook Gives Pledge on Iraq Vote

WORLD (see also 'United Nations' Security Council)

*  Action Against Iraq Must Be Based On Evidence - Najib [Malaysian defence
minister]
*  [Malaysian Prime Minister] Mahathir warns attack on Iraq could lead to
N-terrorism
*  'Paying price' for Iraq policy [Australia, in Bali]
*  Malaysia calls for urgent OIC [Organisation of the Islamic Conference]
meeting on Iraq
*  Iraq keen to buy 0.5m tons more wheat [from Pakistan]
*  Church head blames bombing on Australia's stance on Iraq


AND, IN NEWS, 11-18/10/02 (2)

WHITE MAN'S BURDEN

*  Radical Shias are a worry for Bush as well as Saddam
*  U.S. Changes Gulf War Pilot's Status [See comment on 'A grim reminder of
Iraq's tawdry evil' in Mideast section]
*  Toward a human disaster [Possible humanitarian aid consequences of the
invasion]
*  How we'll fight [New weapons of mass destruction will ensure the total
invulnerability of US forces and total elimination, within a very short
period of time, of the enemy. No reason to enter Baghdad since it can be
starved into submission. Leaving ' the enemy' with no alternative (though
the author deos not spell this out) to the method of surprise terrorist
attack aimed against soft targets.]
*  The war debate: Peter Bouckaert [Peter Bouckaert of Human Rights Watch,
not someone who objects in principle to US military interventions (HRW
played an important role in the war on Serbia) thinks the intervention in
Iraq could be very bloody and nasty.]
*  War against Iraq will hurt global economy: Stiglitz [It appears that 'a
war of total mobilization with huge expenditures', such as the Second World
War 'helped the world out of global deflation and had a positive impact on
the world economy' ... 'But a war on Iraq was likely to involve fewer people
and less expenditure' and this will have a bad effect on the world economy.
If ever I manage to understand this I will feel I have mastered something of
very great importance.]
*  Why the odds on war in Iraq are just one in three [Anatole Kaletsky
argues that the UN gambit is working and will hold the war off until next
Autumn, when, according to his argument, it becomes very likely. Meaning we
have to go through all this nonsense all over again?]
*  The Fifty-first State? [Very long reflection on the problems of a
post-Saddam era in Iraq. Most of it is expressing doubt if the US is able or
willing to assume the responsibilities. I have just retained the end of the
article when he lets the men of faith (mainly James Woolsey. It seems a long
time since we've had him in our sights) have their say. One interesting
aspect of their contribution is the conviction that the overall result of
the catastrophic wars of the twentieth century - including the First World
War - is positive.]

URL ONLY:
http://alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=14317
*  Marine General Speaks Out Against Bush's War Plans
by Eric Boehlert
Salon.com, 17th October
[Lengthy interview with Anthony Zinni who thinks nonetheless that Saddam is
going to have to be taken out sometime, thus leaving himself open to the
Wolfowitz retort, why wait until he's got his weapons of mass destruction.
However, it is remarkable to hear him say: 'I will tell you that in my time,
I never saw anything come out of fighting that was worth the fight.']

NO FLY ZONES

*  Airstrikes Focus on Key Iraq Air Base [Tallil air base, a frequent
target. Rare attempt at an in-depth examination of bombing raids. Another
target, 'H-3', near Jordan, is also discussed.]
*  U.S., British Jets Strike Iraq Air Defenses [Tuesday, 15th October, Al
Kut]


AND, IN NEWS, 11-18/10/02 (3)

INSIDE IRAQ

*  British war cemeteries desecrated by Iraqis [But for the way in which we
respect the enemy dead read 'A grim reminder of Iraq's tawdry evil' in the
Middle East section.]
*  Saddam sure of victory in exuberant Iraqi poll
*  Saddam's man says: it [the Bali bombing] serves you [Australia] right
[The headline and first paragraph in Paul McGeough's article is an
irresponsible distortion of a perfectly reasonable argument by 'Abdul
Al-Hashimi, a former Iraqi ambassador and a Saddam confidante.']
*  Iraq's last Jews wait in fear for war

IRAQIS OUTSIDE IRAQ

*  Iraqi Exiles Nurture Dreams in London [Record of an enterprising
journalist's trip into the furthest reaches of Westbourne Grove.]
*  Jews forge ties with Iraqi dissidents ['Chalabi told the JINSA (Jewish
Institute for National Security Affairs) audience last week that Saddam is
the source of all terrorism in the Middle East ...']

NORTHERN IRAQ/SOUTHERN KURDISTAN

*  Iraqi Arabs Leaving Kirkuk for Fear of U.S. Offensive: Paper
*  Turkish premier says Kurds dragging Turkey to war [and that the Kurds are
being 'directed' by the US.]
*  Turkey has sleepless nights over Kurdish fox, Iraqi hen house [Problems
posed for Turkey by its own forthcoming elections, the invasion of Iraq, and
the reappearance of the Kurdish parliament.]
*  Kurdistan's fighting men feeling abandoned by their protector [They have
received nothing by way of military aid. And one should bear in mind that,
being subject to the same sanctions as the rest of Iraq, they've probably
been having some difficulty obtaining military equipment by other means. By
encouraging them to form a parliament the Americans are encouraging them to
provoke Turkey while at the same time depriving them of the means to defend
themselves. Somehow this story has a familiar ring to it. Doesn't it suggest
... Bosnia in about 1992? (Congratulations anyway to The Scotsman for
drawing attention to this)]
*  Barham Saleh: Iraq is divided ethnically and religiously [The PUK Prime
Minister gives the impression that the Syrian government is quite supportive
of 'Kurdistan'.]
*  Some 10,000 Turkish soldiers deployed in North Iraq, Ankara to establish
security belt
*  Iraqi Kurdish [Barham Saleh] leader makes his case ["the Kurdish people
are one nation  but we have been divided for decades, and I think people
have come to acknowledge and realize that this is our fate."]
*  Kurdish leader [Barzani] wants Turkish troops out of Iraq


AND, IN NEWS, 11-18/10/02 (4)

'UNITED NATIONS' SECURITY COUNCIL

*  Putin demands proof over Iraqi weapons
*  Saddam Could Revoke Access [to weapons inspectors, 'if it deems
Washington is manipulating them']
*  New Iraqi letter vows to ease inspection hurdles
*  Palaces flashpoint in war of nerves [by Paul McGeough: 'It seems the US
insistence on getting into the palaces is as much about sullying symbols of
the regime as it is about denying Saddam his weapons of mass destruction.']
*  Bush Corleone: "Saddam Hussein sleeps with the fishes" [Jeremy Scahill
points out the similarity between the proposed 'UN' resolution and the
Rambouillet Ultimatum imposed on Serbia. Both amount to occupation and the
surrender of sovereignty (and both are clearly of the same family as the
Austrian ultimatum given to Serbia in 1914, not to mention the German
ultimatum to Czechoslovakia in 1939.]
*  Iraq Did Not OK All Inspection Rules - UN's Blix [Among much else, Blix
does not like the idea of ' allowing key council members to join inspections
and choose the sites and using troops to clear any roadways Iraq might block
for inspections.']
*  Congress puts UN in the dock: Bush's Iraq obsession ['"The ability to
have our own people on inspections teams, and not just a bunch of UN
bureaucrats" is not open to discussion, said a senior administration
official closely involved in Iraq planning.' Mainly about the debate between
pro-UN and anti-UN factions in the US. Its difficult to believe that the pro
UN elements ever thought Bush's appeal to the UN was much more than a device
for getting Iraq's neighbours on board. A device which, for the moment,
doesn't seem to be working.]
*  Non-Aligned Countries Urge UN to Refrain From Using Force Against Iraq
[Extract giving Kofi Annan informing the UN Security Council that 'Iraq's
11-year defiance of council resolutions posed "one of the gravest and most
serious" challenges to the UN today'. Who is he trying to fool?]

URLs ONLY:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nyt/20021015/ts_nyt/u_s__fren
ch_split_on_iraq_deepens
*  U.S.-French Split on Iraq Deepens
by JULIA PRESTON with ERIC SCHMITT
Yahoo, from The New York Times, 15th October
[The article mentions that one of the sticking points is 'Washington's
proposals for security guards from other countries for the inspectors and
for the Council powers to attach their own experts to the United Nations
weapons teams.']

http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/w-me/2002/oct/15/101504162.html
*  Iraq Accord Eludes Security Council
by Edith M. Lederer
Las Vegas Sun (from AP), 15th October
[And this article tells us that 'Diplomats said they believe a U.S.
resolution with any language that could authorize force would likely be
opposed by France, Russia, China, Syria, Ireland, Mexico, Cameroon, Guinea
and probably Mauritius - which means it would get a maximum of only six or
seven "yes" votes.'

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/17/international/middleeast/17NTEX.html
*  In the Council: Pleas for Unity and a Debate on Resuming Arms Inspections
The New York Times, 17th October
[One of the very few accounts of the open session of the UN Security
Council, a chance for the united nations to make their voices heard. I would
like to have been able to think this was an important event but if the
extracts given here (in a rather long article) are anything to judge by it
was an opportunity thrown to the winds. Everyone agrees that Iraq's weapons
of mass destruction are an important problem (more important than the very
visible preparations one nation is making for an illegal war and the
announcement by that nation that illegal war - pre-emptive defence - is a
matter of policy); that Iraq, while under threat of imminent invasion, must
let the weapons inspectors crawl all over them; that a new tough resolution
is needed and that it should all be done through the United Nations Security
Council. The day when the united nations will finally get round to
challenging the 'United Nations' is still far off.]

LEGITIMATE MEANS OF SELF DEFENCE

*  Co-chair of Belarus-Iraq trade commission replaced
*  Iraq seeks chemical for arms [Possibility that China might be selling
Iraq 'a chemical used in making missile fuel'. Given that Iraq is allowed to
possess a certain limited missile capacity, is this illegal? And what is the
distinction between 'Chinese arms proliferation activities' and the export
of arms which is such a very important part of our own and the US economy?]
*  'Radar sale to Iraq' inquiry opens [Suspicion that the Ukraine might have
helped to provide Iraq with the means to defend itself - quite legal means
so far as I know - leads the US to suspend $55 million of 'aid' (though
'aid' to the private sector remains unaffected).]
*  Ukraine Sites Checked in Iraq Probe [This and the following article are
based on the proposition  that Iraq has no right to acquire any means of
self defence, a UN sanction which, if it is true, clearly obliges the Iraqi
government to engage in 'illegal' activity (as it obliged the Germans in the
twenties. The spectacle of US and British weapons experts crawling all over
the Ukraine strikes me - am I alone? - as being a quite outrageous violation
of national sovereignty. Or does no-one believe in national sovereignty any
more?]
*  Friends Can Bust Sanctions [An account of the process by which Iraq has
been able to acquire some limited means of self defence. Russia has played
an important part. Everyone knows about this and has agreed to hush it up.
'However, if in the coming days Moscow vetoes a U.S.-sponsored anti-Saddam
resolution in the UN Security Council, some major Western media outlet may
come out with an anti-Russian arms smuggling scoop. If Russia abstains,
Kuchma and Lukashenko may remain as the only ones in the dock.']


AND, IN NEWS, 11-18/10/02 (5)

WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

*  Film Probes German-Iraq Nuclear Link
*  Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction: A Net Assessment [Interesting,
informative, important but very long review of Khidr Hamza's book and of the
Government's 'dossier' by someone who appears to know a great deal at least
about the nuclear side of things. I only give extracts (mainly to do with
Hamza) but the whole article is well worth reading.]
*  North Korea has what Iraq dreams of [North Korea's possession of nuclear
weapons as an argument for war on Iraq and against 'appeasement' of third
world dictators.]
*  U.S. Approaches to N. Korea And Iraq Are Vastly Different [Diplomatic
approach to North Korea as possible model for dealing with Iraq. The
difference as everyone knows is that North Korea possesses nuclear weapons,
Iraq doesn't. The US have shown the world that possession of nuclear weapons
is the necessary prerequisite of national sovereignty.]

MIDDLE EAST/ARAB WORLD

*  A grim reminder of Iraq's tawdry evil [This disgusting article starts
with a graphic description of the massacre we committed on the road to Basra
which, the author says, he saw with his own eyes. He then goes on to say in
effect that the miserably poor, largely Shi'i conscripts surrounded by the
ostentatious wealth of Kuwait, deserved what they got because they had been
... looting. The article does confirm what I've long supposed, and I've
never understood why no-one has made an issue of it: that they were denied
what I had thought was their right under the Geneva convention, a proper
burial: 'Many hundreds of Iraqis who died at Al Mutla were buried beneath
what is now a border police parking lot at the top of the ridge.' And these
are the people who complain about 'mass graves' in Kosovo and Bosnia. Any
effort to identify these 'many hundreds of Iraqis'? to notify their
families?? And anyone going to mention it when the possible fate of Scott
Speicher is lifted up to the status of casus belli???]
*  Bahrain calls for Arab summit to discuss Iraq crisis [Bahrain has been
touted as a US ally but this is quite tough talk from the Bahraini prime
Minsiter: '"The continuous threats (by the U.S.) to wage war in this vital
region was not intended to enforce the return of the UN weapons inspectors
to Iraq but to dominate this Arab country," he said, urging all GCC and Arab
countries to come forward to stop any further deterioration.']
*  UN's Iraq decision not binding, says Prince [Prince Sultan of Saudi
Arabia says that even with a UN resolution, Saudi Arabia wouldn't be obliged
to participate in a war with Iraq].
*  Saudi Arabia won't take part in Iraq attack: Saudi FM [Prince Saud, in
Algeria, reinforcing the recent declaration by Prince Sultan.]
*  Syria expects U.S. to launch attack on Iraq ["Syria is opposed to this
strike because Iraq is a sisterly country and there are no justifications
for such an attack. Unfortunately, the United States, backed by Israel, has
aborted all peaceful efforts because they want to crush any Arab country
which possesses large resources and elements of power." Which is fine. But
it was equally true eleven years ago.]
*  War Games Held in Southern Jordan ['the government stressed the exercise
had nothing to do with preparations for a possible U.S. attack on Iraq'
though conducting war games with forces that are preparing for war on a
neighbouring state is not a neutral act.]
*  Key US headquarters move to Kuwait
*  Qatar Opposes Any U.S. War on Iraq, Considering Bases [though if they
were really opposed one wouldn't think the process of consideration would
take very long.]
*  Iraq accuses Iran of 53 ceasefire violations


_______________________________________________
Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss
To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk
All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk


[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]