The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [casi] no fly zones



It should be remembered that the extension of the illegal southern no fly zone up to
Baghdad has nothing at all to do with protection for the Shiites. It was unauthorised
punishment for Iraq's actions in the north of their country.

Note also that the US/UK do not provide proper damage assessments or casualty
estimates.

They also objected very strongly when Hans von Sponeck started doing so.


On 7 Oct 2002 at 11:39, peter kiernan wrote:

> Hello,
> Can some-one inform about whether the no-fly zones in northern and
> southern Iraq are the result of a UNSC resolution, or zones imposed by
> the US and UK on their own? Thanks, Peter Kiernan
Mark Parkinson
Bodmin
Cornwall



_______________________________________________
Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss
To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk
All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk


[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]