The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
[ Presenting plain-text part of multi-format email ] In a message dated 22/09/02 12:34:02 GMT Daylight Time, email@example.com writes: > Subj:[al-awda-unity] FW: [no-sanctions] Pilger: Diplomacy? > Date:22/09/02 12:34:02 GMT Daylight Time > From:<A HREF="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">email@example.com</A> > To:<A HREF="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">email@example.com</A>, <A >HREF="mailto:al-Awdafirstname.lastname@example.org">al-Awdaemail@example.com</A> > Sent from the Internet > > > > Thanks again to Sandeed Vaidya of Campaign Against Sanctions, Ireland. > > ---------- > From: "vaidyasandeep2000" > Date: Sat, Sep 21, 2002, 1:35 pm > I read this article by Pilger a couple of days ago. I would like to know the general feeling as to how true it is. Personally, I have always found Pilger very reliable and the US manipulation of UN over original Palestine partition resolution is well known. Doesn't this sort of shameful behaviour somewhat demote the authority of the resolution? The question has to be asked as to who the hell US thinks it is! Chris _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email firstname.lastname@example.org All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk