The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[casi] Priceless!

[ Presenting plain-text part of multi-format email ]

It would be funny if it weren't so tragic.

The BBC has an article ( today about the 'US 
threat to stop Iraq inspections'. They report Colin Powell as saying that the Security Council must 
spell out to Iraq the serious consequences if it fails to co-operate with the inspectors!!! But 
they fail to explain how Iraq can co operate with the inspectors if the US goes out of its way to 
prevent the inspectors doing their job!

The article also juxtaposes the following two quotes beautifully:
Saddam Hussein insisted that Baghdad does not possess chemical, biological or nuclear weapons.


The White House called the statement disappointing.

I *bet* the White House is disappointed. Now it's just going to have to go to war and forget about 
appearing as the Christian Crusader that it wants us to believe it is.

Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit
To contact the list manager, email
All postings are archived on CASI's website:

[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]