The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
[ Presenting plain-text part of multi-format email ] In a message dated 17/09/02 18:58:58 GMT Daylight Time, firstname.lastname@example.org writes: > Subj:Re: [casi] Response to Anai Rhoads thoughts > Date:17/09/02 18:58:58 GMT Daylight Time > From:<A HREF="mailto:email@example.com">firstname.lastname@example.org</A> > To:<A HREF="mailto:email@example.com">firstname.lastname@example.org</A> > Sent from the Internet > > > I hope you are wrong. I can't see that Blair can go along with an attack but I might be wrong about that,too. US public opinion is opposed to action without support. Russia, China, and France were not keen(nor are British people and MPs) before action by Iraq. US has started on UN route and is very difficult to drop back now. Before this, I felt very pessimistic. Bush doesn't impress anybody with any brains. He sounds and loooks as if he is suffering from Alzeimers, and Europe(apart from Blair) regard him with contempt, and Cheney, and Rumsfeld, and Ashcroft. Regards, Chris _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email email@example.com All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk