The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
[ Presenting plain-text part of multi-format email ] Sanjay-InfoBelow is what I wrote yesterday. ------------------------------------------- Please Note: By America I mean the descision makers at that time, not the comman people of America (As someone asked me this question :- (What do you mean by America ???) 1) USA 2) Whole Continent 3) USA Govt 4) USA people My Answer is By "America" I mean the people involved in decision making at that time. ) Firstly I would like to add two new things. 1) Iraq president "Saddam Hussain" is loved by all iraq people. except a few (American Iraqui). He provides Medical and economical help to all people. Crime rate is very low in Iraq because of better judgements and respect for their nation in Iraq people. 2) Saddam Hussain have provided Iraq the power to Iraq to withstand against the strongest country in the world. Which I feel no other leader could provide Iraq. and any other leader if replaces Saddam Hussain will make Iraq a servant of USA and Iraq will act as a Slave country like at the moment even big countries like Canada and Britain are doing. 3) Why is Bush so much worried about Iraq people when he is useless in saving his own country man. He should first think about his own country then think abt changing Iraq regime. During Bill Clinton time USA progressed a lot. And whole world was having peace and stability. The moment Bush came WTC fall, and in Whole world including USA progress was halted. We as a member of world community want peace and stability. Any country which brings useless topics which leads to wars should be stopped. Todays problems are: Poverty, Population, Pollution, Shelter, Earth Quakes etc. We should try to reduce them and not have wars unnecessarily. Wars and fights should always be avoided. If USA wants Iraq to reduce weapons firstly itshould empty his own weapons stockpile which is more dangerous than the Iraq posseses. Here below what I wrote yesterday about our Partial World. When China was not having nuclear bombs, It was treated badly by USA. Now when they acquired Nukes they are given Veto in United Nation. Similarly after India & Pak getting the Nuclear Bomb technology are respected in the world. Our world believes only those countries which have already acquired weapons of Mass destructions should be allowed to advance them. USA, Britain, Russia, China, India, Israel, Pakistan etc are allowed to develop better weapons but small countries which oppose USA are seen as a threat to whole world. Why should the world think that USA needs weapons for it's safety and not the smaller Nations. The reality is USA have acted as terrorist more than other countries. USA attacks other countries without giving importance to United Nations. But when other country does something for it's safety it is considered violation of United Nations. Is only the life of people living in USA so important. Are people of other countries cocks and hens in a butcher shop to be killed by terrorists and USA. NATO which includes only America and it's allies should be banned since it threatens the existence of United Nation. Why should not a democratic country America understand the meaning of democracy. Which says equality to all. Should there not be equality to all Nations. America killed many more than whole world combined in World war II by using Nuclear bomb for the first time on Japan. Reality is today a murderer and a terrorist have become the Judge. How much and what type of weapons are needed for safety of a Nation is to be determined by the country people Not by it's enemy country. It's foolishness for a Nation to develop weapons which it's enemy asks him to develop then there is no significance of such weapons. Does anyone use locks and safety in banks according to what thief's and burglars want or what the safety they really need for safety? Safety issue is a personal issue. No other country should intervene other countries safety issues. What if some country asks USA to stop all it security measures, isn't it absurd? USA will decide how much safety is needed not the people of other countries. United Nation should try to stop such bulling efforts of USA. It's a crime to bully weaker people so it is also a crime to bully small countries by stronger country. USA is raping and insulting integrity of weak countries which is a crime according to all laws in this world. If United Nation doesn't stop USA from doing such activities God will punish it. Hope world understand my point of view where every one is given equality. Where everyone's human rights are preserved. Regards Sanjay Sharma. _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk