The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[casi] UK could push for Saddam inspections deadline

Even with the possible deadline proposed by the Ministers to place UN inspectors back into Iraq - 
one has to wonder if the US will still continue on with plans for an attack? Would the 
consideration for a deadline by the United Kingdom cause America to spurt it's ceaseless exposition 
sooner than "planned"?

It is from argumentative discourse and world pressure that the UK has finally come forward with 
this obvious solution. Bringing in UN inspectors was (and is) the only rationale to deal with the 
issue of weapons diplomatically. It seems the UK is stuck between two sides - America and the 
world. The Minsters are choosing the only option that appeases both sides.

Below is a news article I found:

The Foreign Secretary says Britain may push for a deadline to be imposed on Saddam Hussein to 
re-admit UN weapons inspectors.

Jack Straw says Ministers are prepared to consider a call by the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee 
to propose a deadline.

The suggestion comes as British officials have sought to play down suggestions of a rift with the 
US over military action against Iraq.

Hawks in the Washington administration, led by Vice President Dick Cheney, have been pressing the 
call for action to topple Saddam Hussein before he can acquire nuclear weapons.

Britain, in contrast, has argued that the threat of military action could be lifted if the weapons 
inspectors were allowed back in.

Mr Straw, in his official response to the Foreign Affairs Committee's report on the war against 
terrorism, also emphasises the need to tackle Iraq's arsenal of chemical and biological.

He acknowledges that Iraq will be a "better place" without its leader but stopped short of 
advocating a policy of "regime change" in Baghdad.

He stated: "The Government's policy is to secure full implementation of the Security Council 
resolutions relating to Iraq.

"It is also the Government's view that Iraq would be a better place without Saddam Hussein.

"As the Prime Minister has made clear, we are determined to deal with the threat posed by Iraq's 
possession of weapons of mass destruction."

- - - -
Humans have a wonder instinct about things. They can discover everything except the obvious.

Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at

Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit
To contact the list manager, email
All postings are archived on CASI's website:

[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]