The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
This may sound like one of my wilder ideas, but the more I think, the more it seems valid. BBC Newsnight, Pallast in The Best Democracy Money Can Buy, Michael Moore in Stupid White Men, the Washington Post etc, make a valid case for the electoral count re Bush being wrong. 'Trespasser on Federal land and squatter in the Oval Office' is how the uncompromising Moore phrases it. So if he's not really legitimately President, neither is he Commander in Chief. Therefore, not in a position to declare war on anyone (even apart from all the other legal question marks.) How to move it forward, I don't know, but thought worth throwing out. best, f. _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email firstname.lastname@example.org All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk